Socratic persuasion in the crito

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Socrates does not use the Laws' Speech in the Crito principally to persuade Crito to accept his coming execution. It is used instead to persuade Crito to examine and work on his inadequate view of justice. Crito's view of justice fails to coordinate one's duties to friends and those to the law. The Laws' Speech accomplishes this persuasive goal by accompanying Critos earlier speech. Both start from the same view of justice, one that Crito accepts, but reach opposing conclusions. Crito cannot judge between the two appealing speeches. His understanding of justice is too confused for him to decide well how to help Socrates. His need to explain what happened the morning he visited Socrates will prompt him and others to examine this indeterminate view of justice. Socrates foregoes direct refutation because Crito will not abide that usual way of interrogation. Engaging in short question-and-answer conversation is not the only way to bring a person to aporia and the intention to examine oneself. Socrates does not here undermine his assertions in the Apology about his ignorance, lack of interest in teaching, constant philosophizing, and his belief that what he does is question, examine, and test those he talks to.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1021-1046
Number of pages26
JournalBritish Journal for the History of Philosophy
Volume19
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2011

Fingerprint

Justice
Persuasion
Socrates
Apology
Person
Prompts
Intentions
Ignorance
Philosophizing
Aporia
Interrogation
Refutation
Teaching
Indeterminate

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Philosophy

Cite this

@article{f36b52aa5e7e481e8903bfcbd598e7ac,
title = "Socratic persuasion in the crito",
abstract = "Socrates does not use the Laws' Speech in the Crito principally to persuade Crito to accept his coming execution. It is used instead to persuade Crito to examine and work on his inadequate view of justice. Crito's view of justice fails to coordinate one's duties to friends and those to the law. The Laws' Speech accomplishes this persuasive goal by accompanying Critos earlier speech. Both start from the same view of justice, one that Crito accepts, but reach opposing conclusions. Crito cannot judge between the two appealing speeches. His understanding of justice is too confused for him to decide well how to help Socrates. His need to explain what happened the morning he visited Socrates will prompt him and others to examine this indeterminate view of justice. Socrates foregoes direct refutation because Crito will not abide that usual way of interrogation. Engaging in short question-and-answer conversation is not the only way to bring a person to aporia and the intention to examine oneself. Socrates does not here undermine his assertions in the Apology about his ignorance, lack of interest in teaching, constant philosophizing, and his belief that what he does is question, examine, and test those he talks to.",
author = "Moore, {Christopher Robert}",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09608788.2011.624700",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "1021--1046",
journal = "British Journal for the History of Philosophy",
issn = "0960-8788",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

Socratic persuasion in the crito. / Moore, Christopher Robert.

In: British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Vol. 19, No. 6, 01.12.2011, p. 1021-1046.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Socratic persuasion in the crito

AU - Moore, Christopher Robert

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - Socrates does not use the Laws' Speech in the Crito principally to persuade Crito to accept his coming execution. It is used instead to persuade Crito to examine and work on his inadequate view of justice. Crito's view of justice fails to coordinate one's duties to friends and those to the law. The Laws' Speech accomplishes this persuasive goal by accompanying Critos earlier speech. Both start from the same view of justice, one that Crito accepts, but reach opposing conclusions. Crito cannot judge between the two appealing speeches. His understanding of justice is too confused for him to decide well how to help Socrates. His need to explain what happened the morning he visited Socrates will prompt him and others to examine this indeterminate view of justice. Socrates foregoes direct refutation because Crito will not abide that usual way of interrogation. Engaging in short question-and-answer conversation is not the only way to bring a person to aporia and the intention to examine oneself. Socrates does not here undermine his assertions in the Apology about his ignorance, lack of interest in teaching, constant philosophizing, and his belief that what he does is question, examine, and test those he talks to.

AB - Socrates does not use the Laws' Speech in the Crito principally to persuade Crito to accept his coming execution. It is used instead to persuade Crito to examine and work on his inadequate view of justice. Crito's view of justice fails to coordinate one's duties to friends and those to the law. The Laws' Speech accomplishes this persuasive goal by accompanying Critos earlier speech. Both start from the same view of justice, one that Crito accepts, but reach opposing conclusions. Crito cannot judge between the two appealing speeches. His understanding of justice is too confused for him to decide well how to help Socrates. His need to explain what happened the morning he visited Socrates will prompt him and others to examine this indeterminate view of justice. Socrates foregoes direct refutation because Crito will not abide that usual way of interrogation. Engaging in short question-and-answer conversation is not the only way to bring a person to aporia and the intention to examine oneself. Socrates does not here undermine his assertions in the Apology about his ignorance, lack of interest in teaching, constant philosophizing, and his belief that what he does is question, examine, and test those he talks to.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857761747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857761747&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09608788.2011.624700

DO - 10.1080/09608788.2011.624700

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84857761747

VL - 19

SP - 1021

EP - 1046

JO - British Journal for the History of Philosophy

JF - British Journal for the History of Philosophy

SN - 0960-8788

IS - 6

ER -