Soil layering and preferential flow impacts on seasonal changes of GPR signals in two contrasting soils

Jun Zhang, Hangsheng Lin, James Doolittle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Experimental evidence has shown that soil layering can significantly alter water movement through soil profiles, especially in sloping landscapes. Detailed knowledge of soil layering and its position in the landscape is therefore necessary for determining dynamic subsurface flow. In this study, we used Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) in combination with high resolution real-time soil water monitoring to investigate seasonal changes in GPR signals to identify soil horizon interfaces and their impacts on water flow in two contrasting soils. The results showed that 1) in the deep Rushtown soil located in a concave hillslope, GPR reflections in the Bw-BC and BC-C horizon interfaces became clearer as soil became wetter. Such increased contrast along interfaces was due to the presence of water associated with water-restricting BC horizon and lateral flow from upslope area; and 2) in the shallow Weikert soil located in a planar hillslope, GPR reflections in the soil-bedrock interface and the weathered-unweathered rock interface become intermittent as soil became wetter. This scattering of GPR reflection was due to the non-uniform distribution of water in fractured shale bedrock and possible tree root effects. While wet condition permitted the enhanced detection of water distribution in both soil profiles, optimal time for detecting soil layering was different for these two soils: wet condition was more suited for detecting water-restricting dense layer in the deep Rushtown soil, while dry season was optimal for identifying the soil-bedrock interface in the shallow Weikert soil. Overall, this study demonstrates the value of repeated GPR surveys in different seasons to capture subsurface hydrologic processes and the impacts of soil layering and preferential water distribution on seasonal changes of GPR signals. It also provides a useful reference for selecting optimal time for GPR survey in the field.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)560-569
Number of pages10
JournalGeoderma
Volume213
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

ground-penetrating radar
preferential flow
ground penetrating radar
soil
water distribution
bedrock
shallow soil
hillslope
water
soil profile
soil profiles
dense water
C horizons
landscape position
subsurface flow
soil horizon
shale
soil horizons
dry season
water flow

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Soil Science

Cite this

@article{457096cecb8843dc924d68ca78a4bf3d,
title = "Soil layering and preferential flow impacts on seasonal changes of GPR signals in two contrasting soils",
abstract = "Experimental evidence has shown that soil layering can significantly alter water movement through soil profiles, especially in sloping landscapes. Detailed knowledge of soil layering and its position in the landscape is therefore necessary for determining dynamic subsurface flow. In this study, we used Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) in combination with high resolution real-time soil water monitoring to investigate seasonal changes in GPR signals to identify soil horizon interfaces and their impacts on water flow in two contrasting soils. The results showed that 1) in the deep Rushtown soil located in a concave hillslope, GPR reflections in the Bw-BC and BC-C horizon interfaces became clearer as soil became wetter. Such increased contrast along interfaces was due to the presence of water associated with water-restricting BC horizon and lateral flow from upslope area; and 2) in the shallow Weikert soil located in a planar hillslope, GPR reflections in the soil-bedrock interface and the weathered-unweathered rock interface become intermittent as soil became wetter. This scattering of GPR reflection was due to the non-uniform distribution of water in fractured shale bedrock and possible tree root effects. While wet condition permitted the enhanced detection of water distribution in both soil profiles, optimal time for detecting soil layering was different for these two soils: wet condition was more suited for detecting water-restricting dense layer in the deep Rushtown soil, while dry season was optimal for identifying the soil-bedrock interface in the shallow Weikert soil. Overall, this study demonstrates the value of repeated GPR surveys in different seasons to capture subsurface hydrologic processes and the impacts of soil layering and preferential water distribution on seasonal changes of GPR signals. It also provides a useful reference for selecting optimal time for GPR survey in the field.",
author = "Jun Zhang and Hangsheng Lin and James Doolittle",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.08.035",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "213",
pages = "560--569",
journal = "Geoderma",
issn = "0016-7061",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Soil layering and preferential flow impacts on seasonal changes of GPR signals in two contrasting soils. / Zhang, Jun; Lin, Hangsheng; Doolittle, James.

In: Geoderma, Vol. 213, 01.01.2014, p. 560-569.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Soil layering and preferential flow impacts on seasonal changes of GPR signals in two contrasting soils

AU - Zhang, Jun

AU - Lin, Hangsheng

AU - Doolittle, James

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Experimental evidence has shown that soil layering can significantly alter water movement through soil profiles, especially in sloping landscapes. Detailed knowledge of soil layering and its position in the landscape is therefore necessary for determining dynamic subsurface flow. In this study, we used Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) in combination with high resolution real-time soil water monitoring to investigate seasonal changes in GPR signals to identify soil horizon interfaces and their impacts on water flow in two contrasting soils. The results showed that 1) in the deep Rushtown soil located in a concave hillslope, GPR reflections in the Bw-BC and BC-C horizon interfaces became clearer as soil became wetter. Such increased contrast along interfaces was due to the presence of water associated with water-restricting BC horizon and lateral flow from upslope area; and 2) in the shallow Weikert soil located in a planar hillslope, GPR reflections in the soil-bedrock interface and the weathered-unweathered rock interface become intermittent as soil became wetter. This scattering of GPR reflection was due to the non-uniform distribution of water in fractured shale bedrock and possible tree root effects. While wet condition permitted the enhanced detection of water distribution in both soil profiles, optimal time for detecting soil layering was different for these two soils: wet condition was more suited for detecting water-restricting dense layer in the deep Rushtown soil, while dry season was optimal for identifying the soil-bedrock interface in the shallow Weikert soil. Overall, this study demonstrates the value of repeated GPR surveys in different seasons to capture subsurface hydrologic processes and the impacts of soil layering and preferential water distribution on seasonal changes of GPR signals. It also provides a useful reference for selecting optimal time for GPR survey in the field.

AB - Experimental evidence has shown that soil layering can significantly alter water movement through soil profiles, especially in sloping landscapes. Detailed knowledge of soil layering and its position in the landscape is therefore necessary for determining dynamic subsurface flow. In this study, we used Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) in combination with high resolution real-time soil water monitoring to investigate seasonal changes in GPR signals to identify soil horizon interfaces and their impacts on water flow in two contrasting soils. The results showed that 1) in the deep Rushtown soil located in a concave hillslope, GPR reflections in the Bw-BC and BC-C horizon interfaces became clearer as soil became wetter. Such increased contrast along interfaces was due to the presence of water associated with water-restricting BC horizon and lateral flow from upslope area; and 2) in the shallow Weikert soil located in a planar hillslope, GPR reflections in the soil-bedrock interface and the weathered-unweathered rock interface become intermittent as soil became wetter. This scattering of GPR reflection was due to the non-uniform distribution of water in fractured shale bedrock and possible tree root effects. While wet condition permitted the enhanced detection of water distribution in both soil profiles, optimal time for detecting soil layering was different for these two soils: wet condition was more suited for detecting water-restricting dense layer in the deep Rushtown soil, while dry season was optimal for identifying the soil-bedrock interface in the shallow Weikert soil. Overall, this study demonstrates the value of repeated GPR surveys in different seasons to capture subsurface hydrologic processes and the impacts of soil layering and preferential water distribution on seasonal changes of GPR signals. It also provides a useful reference for selecting optimal time for GPR survey in the field.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885367037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885367037&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.08.035

DO - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.08.035

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84885367037

VL - 213

SP - 560

EP - 569

JO - Geoderma

JF - Geoderma

SN - 0016-7061

ER -