Soil temperature and moisture errors in operational eta model analyses

Christopher M. Godfrey, David Jonathan Stensrud

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Proper partitioning of the surface heat fluxes that drive the evolution of the planetary boundary layer in numerical weather prediction models requires an accurate specification of the initial state of the land surface. The National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) operational Eta Model is used to produce land surface analyses by continuously cycling soil temperature and moisture fields. These fields previously evolved only in response to radiation budget constraints and modeled precipitation, but NCEP recently upgraded the self-cycling process so that soil fields respond instead to the radiation budget and observed precipitation. A comparison of 0000 and 1200 UTC Eta Model analyses of soil temperature and moisture at several soil depths with observations from the Oklahoma Mesonet during 2004 and 2005 shows that there are strong biases in soil temperature and a severe underestimation of soil moisture at all depths. After the change to a new assimilation scheme, there is notable improvement in the magnitude of the analyzed soil moisture fields, although a strong dry bias persists in the soil moisture field. A simple one-layer slab soil model quantifies the effect of such soil moisture errors on the diurnal cycle of soil temperature and reveals that these soil moisture errors alone may account for only 1.6°C increases in predicted maximum soil temperatures during the day and temperature reductions of the same magnitude at night. The much larger remaining soil temperature errors possibly stem from documented problems with the solar radiation and longwave parameterizations within the Eta Model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)367-387
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Hydrometeorology
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 31 2008

Fingerprint

soil temperature
soil moisture
radiation budget
land surface
prediction
soil depth
heat flux
solar radiation
slab
parameterization
partitioning
soil
boundary layer
weather
temperature

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

@article{918089b07700431fbfb16fb85ff0de2d,
title = "Soil temperature and moisture errors in operational eta model analyses",
abstract = "Proper partitioning of the surface heat fluxes that drive the evolution of the planetary boundary layer in numerical weather prediction models requires an accurate specification of the initial state of the land surface. The National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) operational Eta Model is used to produce land surface analyses by continuously cycling soil temperature and moisture fields. These fields previously evolved only in response to radiation budget constraints and modeled precipitation, but NCEP recently upgraded the self-cycling process so that soil fields respond instead to the radiation budget and observed precipitation. A comparison of 0000 and 1200 UTC Eta Model analyses of soil temperature and moisture at several soil depths with observations from the Oklahoma Mesonet during 2004 and 2005 shows that there are strong biases in soil temperature and a severe underestimation of soil moisture at all depths. After the change to a new assimilation scheme, there is notable improvement in the magnitude of the analyzed soil moisture fields, although a strong dry bias persists in the soil moisture field. A simple one-layer slab soil model quantifies the effect of such soil moisture errors on the diurnal cycle of soil temperature and reveals that these soil moisture errors alone may account for only 1.6°C increases in predicted maximum soil temperatures during the day and temperature reductions of the same magnitude at night. The much larger remaining soil temperature errors possibly stem from documented problems with the solar radiation and longwave parameterizations within the Eta Model.",
author = "Godfrey, {Christopher M.} and Stensrud, {David Jonathan}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1175/2007JHM942.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "367--387",
journal = "Journal of Hydrometeorology",
issn = "1525-755X",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "3",

}

Soil temperature and moisture errors in operational eta model analyses. / Godfrey, Christopher M.; Stensrud, David Jonathan.

In: Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 9, No. 3, 31.12.2008, p. 367-387.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Soil temperature and moisture errors in operational eta model analyses

AU - Godfrey, Christopher M.

AU - Stensrud, David Jonathan

PY - 2008/12/31

Y1 - 2008/12/31

N2 - Proper partitioning of the surface heat fluxes that drive the evolution of the planetary boundary layer in numerical weather prediction models requires an accurate specification of the initial state of the land surface. The National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) operational Eta Model is used to produce land surface analyses by continuously cycling soil temperature and moisture fields. These fields previously evolved only in response to radiation budget constraints and modeled precipitation, but NCEP recently upgraded the self-cycling process so that soil fields respond instead to the radiation budget and observed precipitation. A comparison of 0000 and 1200 UTC Eta Model analyses of soil temperature and moisture at several soil depths with observations from the Oklahoma Mesonet during 2004 and 2005 shows that there are strong biases in soil temperature and a severe underestimation of soil moisture at all depths. After the change to a new assimilation scheme, there is notable improvement in the magnitude of the analyzed soil moisture fields, although a strong dry bias persists in the soil moisture field. A simple one-layer slab soil model quantifies the effect of such soil moisture errors on the diurnal cycle of soil temperature and reveals that these soil moisture errors alone may account for only 1.6°C increases in predicted maximum soil temperatures during the day and temperature reductions of the same magnitude at night. The much larger remaining soil temperature errors possibly stem from documented problems with the solar radiation and longwave parameterizations within the Eta Model.

AB - Proper partitioning of the surface heat fluxes that drive the evolution of the planetary boundary layer in numerical weather prediction models requires an accurate specification of the initial state of the land surface. The National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) operational Eta Model is used to produce land surface analyses by continuously cycling soil temperature and moisture fields. These fields previously evolved only in response to radiation budget constraints and modeled precipitation, but NCEP recently upgraded the self-cycling process so that soil fields respond instead to the radiation budget and observed precipitation. A comparison of 0000 and 1200 UTC Eta Model analyses of soil temperature and moisture at several soil depths with observations from the Oklahoma Mesonet during 2004 and 2005 shows that there are strong biases in soil temperature and a severe underestimation of soil moisture at all depths. After the change to a new assimilation scheme, there is notable improvement in the magnitude of the analyzed soil moisture fields, although a strong dry bias persists in the soil moisture field. A simple one-layer slab soil model quantifies the effect of such soil moisture errors on the diurnal cycle of soil temperature and reveals that these soil moisture errors alone may account for only 1.6°C increases in predicted maximum soil temperatures during the day and temperature reductions of the same magnitude at night. The much larger remaining soil temperature errors possibly stem from documented problems with the solar radiation and longwave parameterizations within the Eta Model.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58049119259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58049119259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1175/2007JHM942.1

DO - 10.1175/2007JHM942.1

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 367

EP - 387

JO - Journal of Hydrometeorology

JF - Journal of Hydrometeorology

SN - 1525-755X

IS - 3

ER -