Some determinants of stylistic phonological variations

David Iannucci, Lynn Susan Liben, Moshe Anisfeld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

An investigation was made of factors that influence the choice of alternate stylistic pronunciations of words in five categories, each category consisting of an SP (Spelling Pronunciation) alternant and a less formal NSP (Non-SP) alternate; e.g., for round, SP [rawnd] versus NSP [rawn]. Each S first read aloud words-16 in each category-from flash cards as part of an ostensible learning task and then read through the same list of words under instructions to pronounce the words "clearly and accurately." A significantly higher number of SP pronunciations was found in the second task than in the first for all five categories. The frequency and status (a dimension ranging from casual to formal) of words were related to the choice between SP and NSP in two of the categories in both tasks, and Ss' speed of articulation was found to be minimally relevant in the same respect. A crucial structural difference-subphonemic versus phonemic alternation-which differentiates two of the categories from the others, played a central role in the interpretation of results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)956-961
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
Volume7
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1968

Fingerprint

Learning
determinants
Phonological Variation
respect
instruction
interpretation
Spelling
learning

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{bd7fccf474784bc28b3294e975b66efd,
title = "Some determinants of stylistic phonological variations",
abstract = "An investigation was made of factors that influence the choice of alternate stylistic pronunciations of words in five categories, each category consisting of an SP (Spelling Pronunciation) alternant and a less formal NSP (Non-SP) alternate; e.g., for round, SP [rawnd] versus NSP [rawn]. Each S first read aloud words-16 in each category-from flash cards as part of an ostensible learning task and then read through the same list of words under instructions to pronounce the words {"}clearly and accurately.{"} A significantly higher number of SP pronunciations was found in the second task than in the first for all five categories. The frequency and status (a dimension ranging from casual to formal) of words were related to the choice between SP and NSP in two of the categories in both tasks, and Ss' speed of articulation was found to be minimally relevant in the same respect. A crucial structural difference-subphonemic versus phonemic alternation-which differentiates two of the categories from the others, played a central role in the interpretation of results.",
author = "David Iannucci and Liben, {Lynn Susan} and Moshe Anisfeld",
year = "1968",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0022-5371(68)80104-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "956--961",
journal = "Journal of Memory and Language",
issn = "0749-596X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "5",

}

Some determinants of stylistic phonological variations. / Iannucci, David; Liben, Lynn Susan; Anisfeld, Moshe.

In: Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, Vol. 7, No. 5, 01.01.1968, p. 956-961.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Some determinants of stylistic phonological variations

AU - Iannucci, David

AU - Liben, Lynn Susan

AU - Anisfeld, Moshe

PY - 1968/1/1

Y1 - 1968/1/1

N2 - An investigation was made of factors that influence the choice of alternate stylistic pronunciations of words in five categories, each category consisting of an SP (Spelling Pronunciation) alternant and a less formal NSP (Non-SP) alternate; e.g., for round, SP [rawnd] versus NSP [rawn]. Each S first read aloud words-16 in each category-from flash cards as part of an ostensible learning task and then read through the same list of words under instructions to pronounce the words "clearly and accurately." A significantly higher number of SP pronunciations was found in the second task than in the first for all five categories. The frequency and status (a dimension ranging from casual to formal) of words were related to the choice between SP and NSP in two of the categories in both tasks, and Ss' speed of articulation was found to be minimally relevant in the same respect. A crucial structural difference-subphonemic versus phonemic alternation-which differentiates two of the categories from the others, played a central role in the interpretation of results.

AB - An investigation was made of factors that influence the choice of alternate stylistic pronunciations of words in five categories, each category consisting of an SP (Spelling Pronunciation) alternant and a less formal NSP (Non-SP) alternate; e.g., for round, SP [rawnd] versus NSP [rawn]. Each S first read aloud words-16 in each category-from flash cards as part of an ostensible learning task and then read through the same list of words under instructions to pronounce the words "clearly and accurately." A significantly higher number of SP pronunciations was found in the second task than in the first for all five categories. The frequency and status (a dimension ranging from casual to formal) of words were related to the choice between SP and NSP in two of the categories in both tasks, and Ss' speed of articulation was found to be minimally relevant in the same respect. A crucial structural difference-subphonemic versus phonemic alternation-which differentiates two of the categories from the others, played a central role in the interpretation of results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49949123606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49949123606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-5371(68)80104-5

DO - 10.1016/S0022-5371(68)80104-5

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 956

EP - 961

JO - Journal of Memory and Language

JF - Journal of Memory and Language

SN - 0749-596X

IS - 5

ER -