Someone who cares

Evaluation of school advisor programs in two community settings

Joan E. Graham, Kimberly A. Updegraff, Christine A. Tomascik, Susan Marie McHale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We evaluated the impact of School Advisor Programs on young adolescents’ academic, psychological, and psychosocial functioning in two different settings: an urban and a rural community. These programs were expected to buffer students from the declines in functioning often observed during early adolescence through the establishment of close, supportive relationships with adults in the school setting. The design and implementation of the programs took place in the context of community-university partnerships: analysis of the implementation process highlighted the way in which programs are adjusted to the unique concerns and resources of different community settings. Participants included 157 seventh-grade students in an urban community and 118 eighth-grade students in a rural community. In the urban selling, volunteer teacher advisors met weekly with 3 to 7 students in a small group format during a regularly scheduled period of the school day. Results for this community revealed group differences favoring students in the advisor program in extracurricular activity enjoyment, grade point average (GPA), and depression. In addition, individual differences in program experiences were linked to students’ reports of their extracurricular activity enjoyment. In the rural community, teacher advisors were recruited and were responsible for coordinating individual meetings with 1 to 5 students during common free periods. Findings from the rural community revealed no group differences favoring the program group with the exception that students in the advisor program reported higher GPAs. Process data showed that the advisor program reached only a small proportion of students in this community. Discussion focuses on program and setting characteristics that may affect program implementation and effectiveness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)28-42
Number of pages15
JournalApplied Developmental Science
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 1997

Fingerprint

Students
evaluation
Rural Population
school
community
rural community
student
Program Evaluation
Individuality
Group
Volunteers
teacher
Buffers
selling
small group
adolescence
Depression
Psychology
adolescent
university

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

Graham, Joan E. ; Updegraff, Kimberly A. ; Tomascik, Christine A. ; McHale, Susan Marie. / Someone who cares : Evaluation of school advisor programs in two community settings. In: Applied Developmental Science. 1997 ; Vol. 1, No. 1. pp. 28-42.
@article{8be48de566114f11a98781c58a710a99,
title = "Someone who cares: Evaluation of school advisor programs in two community settings",
abstract = "We evaluated the impact of School Advisor Programs on young adolescents’ academic, psychological, and psychosocial functioning in two different settings: an urban and a rural community. These programs were expected to buffer students from the declines in functioning often observed during early adolescence through the establishment of close, supportive relationships with adults in the school setting. The design and implementation of the programs took place in the context of community-university partnerships: analysis of the implementation process highlighted the way in which programs are adjusted to the unique concerns and resources of different community settings. Participants included 157 seventh-grade students in an urban community and 118 eighth-grade students in a rural community. In the urban selling, volunteer teacher advisors met weekly with 3 to 7 students in a small group format during a regularly scheduled period of the school day. Results for this community revealed group differences favoring students in the advisor program in extracurricular activity enjoyment, grade point average (GPA), and depression. In addition, individual differences in program experiences were linked to students’ reports of their extracurricular activity enjoyment. In the rural community, teacher advisors were recruited and were responsible for coordinating individual meetings with 1 to 5 students during common free periods. Findings from the rural community revealed no group differences favoring the program group with the exception that students in the advisor program reported higher GPAs. Process data showed that the advisor program reached only a small proportion of students in this community. Discussion focuses on program and setting characteristics that may affect program implementation and effectiveness.",
author = "Graham, {Joan E.} and Updegraff, {Kimberly A.} and Tomascik, {Christine A.} and McHale, {Susan Marie}",
year = "1997",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1207/s1532480xads0101_4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "28--42",
journal = "Applied Developmental Science",
issn = "1088-8691",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Someone who cares : Evaluation of school advisor programs in two community settings. / Graham, Joan E.; Updegraff, Kimberly A.; Tomascik, Christine A.; McHale, Susan Marie.

In: Applied Developmental Science, Vol. 1, No. 1, 01.03.1997, p. 28-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Someone who cares

T2 - Evaluation of school advisor programs in two community settings

AU - Graham, Joan E.

AU - Updegraff, Kimberly A.

AU - Tomascik, Christine A.

AU - McHale, Susan Marie

PY - 1997/3/1

Y1 - 1997/3/1

N2 - We evaluated the impact of School Advisor Programs on young adolescents’ academic, psychological, and psychosocial functioning in two different settings: an urban and a rural community. These programs were expected to buffer students from the declines in functioning often observed during early adolescence through the establishment of close, supportive relationships with adults in the school setting. The design and implementation of the programs took place in the context of community-university partnerships: analysis of the implementation process highlighted the way in which programs are adjusted to the unique concerns and resources of different community settings. Participants included 157 seventh-grade students in an urban community and 118 eighth-grade students in a rural community. In the urban selling, volunteer teacher advisors met weekly with 3 to 7 students in a small group format during a regularly scheduled period of the school day. Results for this community revealed group differences favoring students in the advisor program in extracurricular activity enjoyment, grade point average (GPA), and depression. In addition, individual differences in program experiences were linked to students’ reports of their extracurricular activity enjoyment. In the rural community, teacher advisors were recruited and were responsible for coordinating individual meetings with 1 to 5 students during common free periods. Findings from the rural community revealed no group differences favoring the program group with the exception that students in the advisor program reported higher GPAs. Process data showed that the advisor program reached only a small proportion of students in this community. Discussion focuses on program and setting characteristics that may affect program implementation and effectiveness.

AB - We evaluated the impact of School Advisor Programs on young adolescents’ academic, psychological, and psychosocial functioning in two different settings: an urban and a rural community. These programs were expected to buffer students from the declines in functioning often observed during early adolescence through the establishment of close, supportive relationships with adults in the school setting. The design and implementation of the programs took place in the context of community-university partnerships: analysis of the implementation process highlighted the way in which programs are adjusted to the unique concerns and resources of different community settings. Participants included 157 seventh-grade students in an urban community and 118 eighth-grade students in a rural community. In the urban selling, volunteer teacher advisors met weekly with 3 to 7 students in a small group format during a regularly scheduled period of the school day. Results for this community revealed group differences favoring students in the advisor program in extracurricular activity enjoyment, grade point average (GPA), and depression. In addition, individual differences in program experiences were linked to students’ reports of their extracurricular activity enjoyment. In the rural community, teacher advisors were recruited and were responsible for coordinating individual meetings with 1 to 5 students during common free periods. Findings from the rural community revealed no group differences favoring the program group with the exception that students in the advisor program reported higher GPAs. Process data showed that the advisor program reached only a small proportion of students in this community. Discussion focuses on program and setting characteristics that may affect program implementation and effectiveness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937259187&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937259187&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/s1532480xads0101_4

DO - 10.1207/s1532480xads0101_4

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 28

EP - 42

JO - Applied Developmental Science

JF - Applied Developmental Science

SN - 1088-8691

IS - 1

ER -