Sometimes it's ok to overeat yourself

Scalar oiw-particles/prepositions in Germanic languages that license an overt anaphor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The primary objective of this article is to provide a sketch of the most salient semantic and syntactic properties of a class of (relatively) non-productive activity verbs (often with an incremental theme) that involve some form of over-prefixation and require the presence of an overt weak pronominal anaphor. I argue here that the weak pronominal anaphor is the overt lexicalization of a pro element that resides in the specifier of DegP (^Degree Phrase) (following Epstein 1984). I also contend that these verbs form a class that has similar, if not analogous, properties of those commonly found with inherent reflexive verbs. Contrary to most treatments of these verbs, I argue that the anaphor in these constructions does receive a distinct theta-role (i.e., Standard).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)203-229
Number of pages27
JournalLeuvense Bijdragen
Volume97
StatePublished - Dec 1 2011

Fingerprint

license
semantics
language
Particle
Germanic Languages
Prepositions
Pronominal
Verbs
Reflexive Verb
Theta Roles
Prefixation
Syntax
Specifier
Salient
Verb Forms
Lexicalization

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{62e45e8db19b41529d1e89b2af434d5f,
title = "Sometimes it's ok to overeat yourself: Scalar oiw-particles/prepositions in Germanic languages that license an overt anaphor",
abstract = "The primary objective of this article is to provide a sketch of the most salient semantic and syntactic properties of a class of (relatively) non-productive activity verbs (often with an incremental theme) that involve some form of over-prefixation and require the presence of an overt weak pronominal anaphor. I argue here that the weak pronominal anaphor is the overt lexicalization of a pro element that resides in the specifier of DegP (^Degree Phrase) (following Epstein 1984). I also contend that these verbs form a class that has similar, if not analogous, properties of those commonly found with inherent reflexive verbs. Contrary to most treatments of these verbs, I argue that the anaphor in these constructions does receive a distinct theta-role (i.e., Standard).",
author = "Michael Putnam",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "97",
pages = "203--229",
journal = "Leuvense Bijdragen",
issn = "0024-1482",
publisher = "Nijhoff",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sometimes it's ok to overeat yourself

T2 - Scalar oiw-particles/prepositions in Germanic languages that license an overt anaphor

AU - Putnam, Michael

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - The primary objective of this article is to provide a sketch of the most salient semantic and syntactic properties of a class of (relatively) non-productive activity verbs (often with an incremental theme) that involve some form of over-prefixation and require the presence of an overt weak pronominal anaphor. I argue here that the weak pronominal anaphor is the overt lexicalization of a pro element that resides in the specifier of DegP (^Degree Phrase) (following Epstein 1984). I also contend that these verbs form a class that has similar, if not analogous, properties of those commonly found with inherent reflexive verbs. Contrary to most treatments of these verbs, I argue that the anaphor in these constructions does receive a distinct theta-role (i.e., Standard).

AB - The primary objective of this article is to provide a sketch of the most salient semantic and syntactic properties of a class of (relatively) non-productive activity verbs (often with an incremental theme) that involve some form of over-prefixation and require the presence of an overt weak pronominal anaphor. I argue here that the weak pronominal anaphor is the overt lexicalization of a pro element that resides in the specifier of DegP (^Degree Phrase) (following Epstein 1984). I also contend that these verbs form a class that has similar, if not analogous, properties of those commonly found with inherent reflexive verbs. Contrary to most treatments of these verbs, I argue that the anaphor in these constructions does receive a distinct theta-role (i.e., Standard).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878612183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878612183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 97

SP - 203

EP - 229

JO - Leuvense Bijdragen

JF - Leuvense Bijdragen

SN - 0024-1482

ER -