Source orientation in human-computer interaction: Programmer, networker, or independent social actor?

S. Shyam Sundar, Clifford Nass

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

121 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When individuals apply social rules and social expectations while working on a computer, are they directly interacting with the computer as an independent social actor or source (the CAS model), or are they orienting to an unseen programmer or imagined person in another room (the CAM model)? Two studies provide critical tests of these competing models. In Study 1, all participants were exposed to an identical interaction with computers. In one condition, participants were told that they were dealing with computers; in another, they were told that they were interacting with the software programmers. Consistent with the CAS model, there were significant differences between the two conditions. Study 2 performed a constructive replication of Study 1 by replacing the programmer with a hypothetical networker. Again, differences between the two conditions provide evidence that people respond to the computer as an independent source of information.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)683-703
Number of pages21
JournalCommunication Research
Volume27
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

social actor
Human computer interaction
interaction
CAM
Computer aided manufacturing
source of information
Human-computer Interaction
human being
evidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{7e327869fae74385bdccb385359b5775,
title = "Source orientation in human-computer interaction: Programmer, networker, or independent social actor?",
abstract = "When individuals apply social rules and social expectations while working on a computer, are they directly interacting with the computer as an independent social actor or source (the CAS model), or are they orienting to an unseen programmer or imagined person in another room (the CAM model)? Two studies provide critical tests of these competing models. In Study 1, all participants were exposed to an identical interaction with computers. In one condition, participants were told that they were dealing with computers; in another, they were told that they were interacting with the software programmers. Consistent with the CAS model, there were significant differences between the two conditions. Study 2 performed a constructive replication of Study 1 by replacing the programmer with a hypothetical networker. Again, differences between the two conditions provide evidence that people respond to the computer as an independent source of information.",
author = "Sundar, {S. Shyam} and Clifford Nass",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/009365000027006001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "683--703",
journal = "Communication Research",
issn = "0093-6502",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Source orientation in human-computer interaction : Programmer, networker, or independent social actor? / Sundar, S. Shyam; Nass, Clifford.

In: Communication Research, Vol. 27, No. 6, 01.01.2000, p. 683-703.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Source orientation in human-computer interaction

T2 - Programmer, networker, or independent social actor?

AU - Sundar, S. Shyam

AU - Nass, Clifford

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - When individuals apply social rules and social expectations while working on a computer, are they directly interacting with the computer as an independent social actor or source (the CAS model), or are they orienting to an unseen programmer or imagined person in another room (the CAM model)? Two studies provide critical tests of these competing models. In Study 1, all participants were exposed to an identical interaction with computers. In one condition, participants were told that they were dealing with computers; in another, they were told that they were interacting with the software programmers. Consistent with the CAS model, there were significant differences between the two conditions. Study 2 performed a constructive replication of Study 1 by replacing the programmer with a hypothetical networker. Again, differences between the two conditions provide evidence that people respond to the computer as an independent source of information.

AB - When individuals apply social rules and social expectations while working on a computer, are they directly interacting with the computer as an independent social actor or source (the CAS model), or are they orienting to an unseen programmer or imagined person in another room (the CAM model)? Two studies provide critical tests of these competing models. In Study 1, all participants were exposed to an identical interaction with computers. In one condition, participants were told that they were dealing with computers; in another, they were told that they were interacting with the software programmers. Consistent with the CAS model, there were significant differences between the two conditions. Study 2 performed a constructive replication of Study 1 by replacing the programmer with a hypothetical networker. Again, differences between the two conditions provide evidence that people respond to the computer as an independent source of information.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034355896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034355896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/009365000027006001

DO - 10.1177/009365000027006001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034355896

VL - 27

SP - 683

EP - 703

JO - Communication Research

JF - Communication Research

SN - 0093-6502

IS - 6

ER -