Sources of personal neighbor networks: Social integration, need, or time?

Karen E. Campbell, Barrett Alan Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

219 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In response to Wirth's (1938) image of city dwellers as isolated individuals lacking strong ties to others, urban sociologists and network analysts have closely examined personal networks. Because neighbors are vital components of such networks, we examine three theoretical perspectives offered to explain the links between statuses and neighbor networks: social integration, need, and available time. Survey evidence from 690 adults in 81 Nashville, Tennessee neighborhoods best supports a social integration interpretation - those in statuses well integrated into society in general (female, middle-aged, married, and high-SES respondents) have larger networks within their neighborhoods. Need may be the inverse of integration, for low-SES persons, though maintaining smaller networks, have more frequent and intense contact with their neighbors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1077-1100
Number of pages24
JournalSocial Forces
Volume70
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992

Fingerprint

social integration
sociologist
time
Neighbors
Social Integration
contact
interpretation
human being
evidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • History
  • Anthropology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Campbell, Karen E. ; Lee, Barrett Alan. / Sources of personal neighbor networks : Social integration, need, or time?. In: Social Forces. 1992 ; Vol. 70, No. 4. pp. 1077-1100.
@article{1d165e4139e04d6983b7d62d297011d8,
title = "Sources of personal neighbor networks: Social integration, need, or time?",
abstract = "In response to Wirth's (1938) image of city dwellers as isolated individuals lacking strong ties to others, urban sociologists and network analysts have closely examined personal networks. Because neighbors are vital components of such networks, we examine three theoretical perspectives offered to explain the links between statuses and neighbor networks: social integration, need, and available time. Survey evidence from 690 adults in 81 Nashville, Tennessee neighborhoods best supports a social integration interpretation - those in statuses well integrated into society in general (female, middle-aged, married, and high-SES respondents) have larger networks within their neighborhoods. Need may be the inverse of integration, for low-SES persons, though maintaining smaller networks, have more frequent and intense contact with their neighbors.",
author = "Campbell, {Karen E.} and Lee, {Barrett Alan}",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/sf/70.4.1077",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "1077--1100",
journal = "Social Forces",
issn = "0037-7732",
publisher = "University of North Carolina Press",
number = "4",

}

Sources of personal neighbor networks : Social integration, need, or time? / Campbell, Karen E.; Lee, Barrett Alan.

In: Social Forces, Vol. 70, No. 4, 01.01.1992, p. 1077-1100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sources of personal neighbor networks

T2 - Social integration, need, or time?

AU - Campbell, Karen E.

AU - Lee, Barrett Alan

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - In response to Wirth's (1938) image of city dwellers as isolated individuals lacking strong ties to others, urban sociologists and network analysts have closely examined personal networks. Because neighbors are vital components of such networks, we examine three theoretical perspectives offered to explain the links between statuses and neighbor networks: social integration, need, and available time. Survey evidence from 690 adults in 81 Nashville, Tennessee neighborhoods best supports a social integration interpretation - those in statuses well integrated into society in general (female, middle-aged, married, and high-SES respondents) have larger networks within their neighborhoods. Need may be the inverse of integration, for low-SES persons, though maintaining smaller networks, have more frequent and intense contact with their neighbors.

AB - In response to Wirth's (1938) image of city dwellers as isolated individuals lacking strong ties to others, urban sociologists and network analysts have closely examined personal networks. Because neighbors are vital components of such networks, we examine three theoretical perspectives offered to explain the links between statuses and neighbor networks: social integration, need, and available time. Survey evidence from 690 adults in 81 Nashville, Tennessee neighborhoods best supports a social integration interpretation - those in statuses well integrated into society in general (female, middle-aged, married, and high-SES respondents) have larger networks within their neighborhoods. Need may be the inverse of integration, for low-SES persons, though maintaining smaller networks, have more frequent and intense contact with their neighbors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962994625&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962994625&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/sf/70.4.1077

DO - 10.1093/sf/70.4.1077

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84962994625

VL - 70

SP - 1077

EP - 1100

JO - Social Forces

JF - Social Forces

SN - 0037-7732

IS - 4

ER -