Space and Time

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article describes the debate about space and time in the early modern period focusing on the exchange between Gottfried Leibniz and Isaac Newton. It provides a brief account of Galileo's critique of medieval cosmology, the finite, two-sphere cosmos with fixed places as well as a beginning and an end in time, the related account of motion as finite and in need of an external agent, and the too-limited use of geometry in mechanics. The article reviews in some detail the achievements of Leibniz and Newton in order to make clear the differences in their views about space and time, construed in mathematical, metaphysical, and physical terms as they emerged in the Leibniz/Clarke correspondence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Electronic)9780191724855
ISBN (Print)9780199556137
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2 2011

Fingerprint

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
Physical
Isaac Newton
Cosmos
Cosmology
Metaphysical
Medieval Period
Galileo
Geometry

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Grosholz, E. R. (2011). Space and Time. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199556137.003.0004
Grosholz, Emily Rolfe. / Space and Time. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe. Oxford University Press, 2011.
@inbook{8e724b3a0b6d4c909675bdbe7634e23b,
title = "Space and Time",
abstract = "This article describes the debate about space and time in the early modern period focusing on the exchange between Gottfried Leibniz and Isaac Newton. It provides a brief account of Galileo's critique of medieval cosmology, the finite, two-sphere cosmos with fixed places as well as a beginning and an end in time, the related account of motion as finite and in need of an external agent, and the too-limited use of geometry in mechanics. The article reviews in some detail the achievements of Leibniz and Newton in order to make clear the differences in their views about space and time, construed in mathematical, metaphysical, and physical terms as they emerged in the Leibniz/Clarke correspondence.",
author = "Grosholz, {Emily Rolfe}",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199556137.003.0004",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780199556137",
booktitle = "The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Grosholz, ER 2011, Space and Time. in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199556137.003.0004

Space and Time. / Grosholz, Emily Rolfe.

The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe. Oxford University Press, 2011.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Space and Time

AU - Grosholz, Emily Rolfe

PY - 2011/5/2

Y1 - 2011/5/2

N2 - This article describes the debate about space and time in the early modern period focusing on the exchange between Gottfried Leibniz and Isaac Newton. It provides a brief account of Galileo's critique of medieval cosmology, the finite, two-sphere cosmos with fixed places as well as a beginning and an end in time, the related account of motion as finite and in need of an external agent, and the too-limited use of geometry in mechanics. The article reviews in some detail the achievements of Leibniz and Newton in order to make clear the differences in their views about space and time, construed in mathematical, metaphysical, and physical terms as they emerged in the Leibniz/Clarke correspondence.

AB - This article describes the debate about space and time in the early modern period focusing on the exchange between Gottfried Leibniz and Isaac Newton. It provides a brief account of Galileo's critique of medieval cosmology, the finite, two-sphere cosmos with fixed places as well as a beginning and an end in time, the related account of motion as finite and in need of an external agent, and the too-limited use of geometry in mechanics. The article reviews in some detail the achievements of Leibniz and Newton in order to make clear the differences in their views about space and time, construed in mathematical, metaphysical, and physical terms as they emerged in the Leibniz/Clarke correspondence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925851016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925851016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199556137.003.0004

DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199556137.003.0004

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84925851016

SN - 9780199556137

BT - The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -

Grosholz ER. Space and Time. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy in Early Modern Europe. Oxford University Press. 2011 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199556137.003.0004