TY - JOUR
T1 - Spatial and Temporal Variability of Root-Zone Soil Moisture Acquired from Hydrologic Modeling and AirMOSS P-Band Radar
AU - Crow, Wade T.
AU - Milak, Sushil
AU - Moghaddam, Mahta
AU - Tabatabaeenejad, Alireza
AU - Jaruwatanadilok, Sermsak
AU - Yu, Xuan
AU - Shi, Yuning
AU - Reichle, Rolf H.
AU - Hagimoto, Yutaka
AU - Cuenca, Richard H.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany , including collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data. Medical writing support was provided by Katherine Sutherland, PhD, of Huntsworth Health Ltd, with funding from Bayer AG. The authors thank the study investigators, staff, coordinators, nurses, and patients for their contributions. This work was presented at the European Society of Gynecology Congress in Barcelona in 2017.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 IEEE.
PY - 2018/12
Y1 - 2018/12
N2 - The accurate estimation of grid-scale fluxes of water, energy, and carbon requires consideration of subgrid spatial variability in root-zone soil moisture (RZSM). The NASA Airborne Microwave Observatory of Subcanopy and Subsurface (AirMOSS) mission represents the first systematic attempt to repeatedly map high-resolution RZSM fields using airborne remote sensing across a range of biomes. Here, we compare 3-arc-sec (∼100 m) spatial resolution AirMOSS RZSM retrievals from P-band radar acquisitions over nine separate North American study sites with analogous RZSM estimates generated by the Flux-Penn State Integrated Hydrologic Model (Flux-PIHM). The two products demonstrate comparable levels of accuracy when evaluated against ground-based soil moisture products and a significant level of temporal cross correlation. However, relative to the AirMOSS RZSM retrievals, Flux-PIHM RZSM estimates generally demonstrate much lower levels of spatial and temporal variability, and the spatial patterns captured by both products are poorly correlated. Nevertheless, based on a discussion of likely error sources affecting both products, it is argued that the spatial analysis of AirMOSS and Flux-PIHM RZSM fields provides meaningful upper and lower bounds on the potential range of RZSM spatial variability encountered across a range of natural biomes.
AB - The accurate estimation of grid-scale fluxes of water, energy, and carbon requires consideration of subgrid spatial variability in root-zone soil moisture (RZSM). The NASA Airborne Microwave Observatory of Subcanopy and Subsurface (AirMOSS) mission represents the first systematic attempt to repeatedly map high-resolution RZSM fields using airborne remote sensing across a range of biomes. Here, we compare 3-arc-sec (∼100 m) spatial resolution AirMOSS RZSM retrievals from P-band radar acquisitions over nine separate North American study sites with analogous RZSM estimates generated by the Flux-Penn State Integrated Hydrologic Model (Flux-PIHM). The two products demonstrate comparable levels of accuracy when evaluated against ground-based soil moisture products and a significant level of temporal cross correlation. However, relative to the AirMOSS RZSM retrievals, Flux-PIHM RZSM estimates generally demonstrate much lower levels of spatial and temporal variability, and the spatial patterns captured by both products are poorly correlated. Nevertheless, based on a discussion of likely error sources affecting both products, it is argued that the spatial analysis of AirMOSS and Flux-PIHM RZSM fields provides meaningful upper and lower bounds on the potential range of RZSM spatial variability encountered across a range of natural biomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059033892&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059033892&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2865251
DO - 10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2865251
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85059033892
SN - 1939-1404
VL - 11
SP - 4578
EP - 4590
JO - IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
JF - IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
IS - 12
M1 - 8586924
ER -