Spatial perception of speech in various signal to noise ratios

Kim S. Abouchacra, Diana C. Emanuel, Ingrid Maria Blood, Tomasz R. Letowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The study was designed to assess the effects of background noise level on the detection and localization of speech. Design: The phrase 'Where is this?' was presented either in quiet or in a diffuse noise field, through loudspeakers arranged in a 360°azimuth array. The noise conditions included 11 signal to noise ratios (SNRs) ranging from -18 dB SNR to +12 dB SNR in 3 dB increments. Seventeen normal-hearing subjects, aged 18 to 29, participated in the study. Results: Results revealed that in all listening conditions the signal was most easily detected when presented through a loudspeaker positioned at 90°or 270°azimuth. Although the actual level for 50% detection varied as a function of loudspeaker location and SNR, 85% and 100% of all presentations of the signal were detected at -9 dB and -6 dB SNR, respectively. Localization accuracy improved as the SNR increased, ranging from 18% accuracy at -18 dB SNR to 89% at +12 dB SNR. Localization accuracy in quiet was 95%. The data are discussed in reference to patterns of responses at each loudspeaker location. Conclusions: Detection of the target signal deteriorated as background noise level increased and was dependent on the source location of the incoming signal, as expected. Localization accuracy of the target signal was highly dependent on the SNR and spatial location of the signal source. Detection and localization accuracy data were found to be repeatable across test sessions and response patterns were found to be symmetrical on the right and left sides of the horizontal plane.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)298-309
Number of pages12
JournalEar and Hearing
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

Speech Perception
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Noise
Hearing

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Abouchacra, K. S., Emanuel, D. C., Blood, I. M., & Letowski, T. R. (1998). Spatial perception of speech in various signal to noise ratios. Ear and Hearing, 19(4), 298-309. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199808000-00005
Abouchacra, Kim S. ; Emanuel, Diana C. ; Blood, Ingrid Maria ; Letowski, Tomasz R. / Spatial perception of speech in various signal to noise ratios. In: Ear and Hearing. 1998 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 298-309.
@article{c476030c61ee4a4baef52a7132e6f85e,
title = "Spatial perception of speech in various signal to noise ratios",
abstract = "Objective: The study was designed to assess the effects of background noise level on the detection and localization of speech. Design: The phrase 'Where is this?' was presented either in quiet or in a diffuse noise field, through loudspeakers arranged in a 360°azimuth array. The noise conditions included 11 signal to noise ratios (SNRs) ranging from -18 dB SNR to +12 dB SNR in 3 dB increments. Seventeen normal-hearing subjects, aged 18 to 29, participated in the study. Results: Results revealed that in all listening conditions the signal was most easily detected when presented through a loudspeaker positioned at 90°or 270°azimuth. Although the actual level for 50{\%} detection varied as a function of loudspeaker location and SNR, 85{\%} and 100{\%} of all presentations of the signal were detected at -9 dB and -6 dB SNR, respectively. Localization accuracy improved as the SNR increased, ranging from 18{\%} accuracy at -18 dB SNR to 89{\%} at +12 dB SNR. Localization accuracy in quiet was 95{\%}. The data are discussed in reference to patterns of responses at each loudspeaker location. Conclusions: Detection of the target signal deteriorated as background noise level increased and was dependent on the source location of the incoming signal, as expected. Localization accuracy of the target signal was highly dependent on the SNR and spatial location of the signal source. Detection and localization accuracy data were found to be repeatable across test sessions and response patterns were found to be symmetrical on the right and left sides of the horizontal plane.",
author = "Abouchacra, {Kim S.} and Emanuel, {Diana C.} and Blood, {Ingrid Maria} and Letowski, {Tomasz R.}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00003446-199808000-00005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "298--309",
journal = "Ear and Hearing",
issn = "0196-0202",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

Abouchacra, KS, Emanuel, DC, Blood, IM & Letowski, TR 1998, 'Spatial perception of speech in various signal to noise ratios', Ear and Hearing, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 298-309. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199808000-00005

Spatial perception of speech in various signal to noise ratios. / Abouchacra, Kim S.; Emanuel, Diana C.; Blood, Ingrid Maria; Letowski, Tomasz R.

In: Ear and Hearing, Vol. 19, No. 4, 01.01.1998, p. 298-309.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatial perception of speech in various signal to noise ratios

AU - Abouchacra, Kim S.

AU - Emanuel, Diana C.

AU - Blood, Ingrid Maria

AU - Letowski, Tomasz R.

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - Objective: The study was designed to assess the effects of background noise level on the detection and localization of speech. Design: The phrase 'Where is this?' was presented either in quiet or in a diffuse noise field, through loudspeakers arranged in a 360°azimuth array. The noise conditions included 11 signal to noise ratios (SNRs) ranging from -18 dB SNR to +12 dB SNR in 3 dB increments. Seventeen normal-hearing subjects, aged 18 to 29, participated in the study. Results: Results revealed that in all listening conditions the signal was most easily detected when presented through a loudspeaker positioned at 90°or 270°azimuth. Although the actual level for 50% detection varied as a function of loudspeaker location and SNR, 85% and 100% of all presentations of the signal were detected at -9 dB and -6 dB SNR, respectively. Localization accuracy improved as the SNR increased, ranging from 18% accuracy at -18 dB SNR to 89% at +12 dB SNR. Localization accuracy in quiet was 95%. The data are discussed in reference to patterns of responses at each loudspeaker location. Conclusions: Detection of the target signal deteriorated as background noise level increased and was dependent on the source location of the incoming signal, as expected. Localization accuracy of the target signal was highly dependent on the SNR and spatial location of the signal source. Detection and localization accuracy data were found to be repeatable across test sessions and response patterns were found to be symmetrical on the right and left sides of the horizontal plane.

AB - Objective: The study was designed to assess the effects of background noise level on the detection and localization of speech. Design: The phrase 'Where is this?' was presented either in quiet or in a diffuse noise field, through loudspeakers arranged in a 360°azimuth array. The noise conditions included 11 signal to noise ratios (SNRs) ranging from -18 dB SNR to +12 dB SNR in 3 dB increments. Seventeen normal-hearing subjects, aged 18 to 29, participated in the study. Results: Results revealed that in all listening conditions the signal was most easily detected when presented through a loudspeaker positioned at 90°or 270°azimuth. Although the actual level for 50% detection varied as a function of loudspeaker location and SNR, 85% and 100% of all presentations of the signal were detected at -9 dB and -6 dB SNR, respectively. Localization accuracy improved as the SNR increased, ranging from 18% accuracy at -18 dB SNR to 89% at +12 dB SNR. Localization accuracy in quiet was 95%. The data are discussed in reference to patterns of responses at each loudspeaker location. Conclusions: Detection of the target signal deteriorated as background noise level increased and was dependent on the source location of the incoming signal, as expected. Localization accuracy of the target signal was highly dependent on the SNR and spatial location of the signal source. Detection and localization accuracy data were found to be repeatable across test sessions and response patterns were found to be symmetrical on the right and left sides of the horizontal plane.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031851495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031851495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00003446-199808000-00005

DO - 10.1097/00003446-199808000-00005

M3 - Article

C2 - 9728725

AN - SCOPUS:0031851495

VL - 19

SP - 298

EP - 309

JO - Ear and Hearing

JF - Ear and Hearing

SN - 0196-0202

IS - 4

ER -