Spinal anaesthesia but not general anaesthesia enhances neutrophil biocidal activity in hip arthroplasty patients

Richard Erskine, Piotr Janicki, Gail Neil, Michael F M James

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare neutrophil cidal activity during general or spinal anaesthesia. Assays were performed on neutrophils extracted from the blood of patients after surgery had been under way for one hour. First, the ability of the neutrophils to kill a standard laboratory strain of S. aureus was examined. Neutrophils extracted from the blood during surgery in the spinal anaesthetic group and incubated with the staphylococci for one hour killed twice as many bacteria than those from two groups of patients that received halothane or isoflurane general anaesthesia (P < 0.05). This effect persisted, to a lesser extent, in the spinal group neutrophils after two hours of incubation with the bacteria. Second, neutrophils from patients under the same conditions of surgery and anaesthesia were tested to examine the effect of the different anaesthetic techniques on neutrophil biocidal mechanisms. Neutrophils extracted during surgery in the spinal group released more superoxide in response to phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) than those from both groups of patients that received general anaesthesia (P < 0.05). It is concluded that there is an increased state of reactivity of the neutrophil cell membrane NADPH oxidase system in patients receiving spinal anaesthesia than in patients receiving general anaesthesia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)632-638
Number of pages7
JournalCanadian Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume41
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 1994

Fingerprint

Spinal Anesthesia
Arthroplasty
General Anesthesia
Hip
Neutrophils
Anesthetics
Bacteria
NADPH Oxidase
Isoflurane
Halothane
Staphylococcus
Superoxides
Acetates
Anesthesia
Cell Membrane

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

@article{d735636858234ff9bb9fe29bb61f06ac,
title = "Spinal anaesthesia but not general anaesthesia enhances neutrophil biocidal activity in hip arthroplasty patients",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to compare neutrophil cidal activity during general or spinal anaesthesia. Assays were performed on neutrophils extracted from the blood of patients after surgery had been under way for one hour. First, the ability of the neutrophils to kill a standard laboratory strain of S. aureus was examined. Neutrophils extracted from the blood during surgery in the spinal anaesthetic group and incubated with the staphylococci for one hour killed twice as many bacteria than those from two groups of patients that received halothane or isoflurane general anaesthesia (P < 0.05). This effect persisted, to a lesser extent, in the spinal group neutrophils after two hours of incubation with the bacteria. Second, neutrophils from patients under the same conditions of surgery and anaesthesia were tested to examine the effect of the different anaesthetic techniques on neutrophil biocidal mechanisms. Neutrophils extracted during surgery in the spinal group released more superoxide in response to phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) than those from both groups of patients that received general anaesthesia (P < 0.05). It is concluded that there is an increased state of reactivity of the neutrophil cell membrane NADPH oxidase system in patients receiving spinal anaesthesia than in patients receiving general anaesthesia.",
author = "Richard Erskine and Piotr Janicki and Gail Neil and James, {Michael F M}",
year = "1994",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF03010005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "632--638",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia",
issn = "0832-610X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "7",

}

Spinal anaesthesia but not general anaesthesia enhances neutrophil biocidal activity in hip arthroplasty patients. / Erskine, Richard; Janicki, Piotr; Neil, Gail; James, Michael F M.

In: Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol. 41, No. 7, 01.07.1994, p. 632-638.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spinal anaesthesia but not general anaesthesia enhances neutrophil biocidal activity in hip arthroplasty patients

AU - Erskine, Richard

AU - Janicki, Piotr

AU - Neil, Gail

AU - James, Michael F M

PY - 1994/7/1

Y1 - 1994/7/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare neutrophil cidal activity during general or spinal anaesthesia. Assays were performed on neutrophils extracted from the blood of patients after surgery had been under way for one hour. First, the ability of the neutrophils to kill a standard laboratory strain of S. aureus was examined. Neutrophils extracted from the blood during surgery in the spinal anaesthetic group and incubated with the staphylococci for one hour killed twice as many bacteria than those from two groups of patients that received halothane or isoflurane general anaesthesia (P < 0.05). This effect persisted, to a lesser extent, in the spinal group neutrophils after two hours of incubation with the bacteria. Second, neutrophils from patients under the same conditions of surgery and anaesthesia were tested to examine the effect of the different anaesthetic techniques on neutrophil biocidal mechanisms. Neutrophils extracted during surgery in the spinal group released more superoxide in response to phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) than those from both groups of patients that received general anaesthesia (P < 0.05). It is concluded that there is an increased state of reactivity of the neutrophil cell membrane NADPH oxidase system in patients receiving spinal anaesthesia than in patients receiving general anaesthesia.

AB - The purpose of this study was to compare neutrophil cidal activity during general or spinal anaesthesia. Assays were performed on neutrophils extracted from the blood of patients after surgery had been under way for one hour. First, the ability of the neutrophils to kill a standard laboratory strain of S. aureus was examined. Neutrophils extracted from the blood during surgery in the spinal anaesthetic group and incubated with the staphylococci for one hour killed twice as many bacteria than those from two groups of patients that received halothane or isoflurane general anaesthesia (P < 0.05). This effect persisted, to a lesser extent, in the spinal group neutrophils after two hours of incubation with the bacteria. Second, neutrophils from patients under the same conditions of surgery and anaesthesia were tested to examine the effect of the different anaesthetic techniques on neutrophil biocidal mechanisms. Neutrophils extracted during surgery in the spinal group released more superoxide in response to phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) than those from both groups of patients that received general anaesthesia (P < 0.05). It is concluded that there is an increased state of reactivity of the neutrophil cell membrane NADPH oxidase system in patients receiving spinal anaesthesia than in patients receiving general anaesthesia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027930127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027930127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF03010005

DO - 10.1007/BF03010005

M3 - Article

C2 - 8087913

AN - SCOPUS:0027930127

VL - 41

SP - 632

EP - 638

JO - Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia

JF - Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia

SN - 0832-610X

IS - 7

ER -