Spuriousness or mediation? Broken windows according to Sampson and Raudenbush (1999)

Martha Gault, Eric Silver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 1999, Sampson and Raudenbush published an influential article in the American Sociological Review on the link between disorder and crime in urban neighborhoods. The present article offers a reinterpretation of their 1999 article based on the contentions that: (1) their interpretation of the broken windows thesis is imprecise, and (2) there is an alternative interpretation of their findings that was not considered. Based on these contentions, and contrary to Sampson and Raudenbush's (1999) assertions, the authors conclude that the results of Sampson and Raudenbush's study are not inconsistent with the broken windows thesis and therefore should not be used as empirical evidence against it.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)240-243
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Criminal Justice
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2008

Fingerprint

Crime
mediation
interpretation
offense
evidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

@article{09d924e0ce394784b2e9bd5996bfe3f3,
title = "Spuriousness or mediation? Broken windows according to Sampson and Raudenbush (1999)",
abstract = "In 1999, Sampson and Raudenbush published an influential article in the American Sociological Review on the link between disorder and crime in urban neighborhoods. The present article offers a reinterpretation of their 1999 article based on the contentions that: (1) their interpretation of the broken windows thesis is imprecise, and (2) there is an alternative interpretation of their findings that was not considered. Based on these contentions, and contrary to Sampson and Raudenbush's (1999) assertions, the authors conclude that the results of Sampson and Raudenbush's study are not inconsistent with the broken windows thesis and therefore should not be used as empirical evidence against it.",
author = "Martha Gault and Eric Silver",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2008.04.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "240--243",
journal = "Journal of Criminal Justice",
issn = "0047-2352",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

Spuriousness or mediation? Broken windows according to Sampson and Raudenbush (1999). / Gault, Martha; Silver, Eric.

In: Journal of Criminal Justice, Vol. 36, No. 3, 01.07.2008, p. 240-243.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spuriousness or mediation? Broken windows according to Sampson and Raudenbush (1999)

AU - Gault, Martha

AU - Silver, Eric

PY - 2008/7/1

Y1 - 2008/7/1

N2 - In 1999, Sampson and Raudenbush published an influential article in the American Sociological Review on the link between disorder and crime in urban neighborhoods. The present article offers a reinterpretation of their 1999 article based on the contentions that: (1) their interpretation of the broken windows thesis is imprecise, and (2) there is an alternative interpretation of their findings that was not considered. Based on these contentions, and contrary to Sampson and Raudenbush's (1999) assertions, the authors conclude that the results of Sampson and Raudenbush's study are not inconsistent with the broken windows thesis and therefore should not be used as empirical evidence against it.

AB - In 1999, Sampson and Raudenbush published an influential article in the American Sociological Review on the link between disorder and crime in urban neighborhoods. The present article offers a reinterpretation of their 1999 article based on the contentions that: (1) their interpretation of the broken windows thesis is imprecise, and (2) there is an alternative interpretation of their findings that was not considered. Based on these contentions, and contrary to Sampson and Raudenbush's (1999) assertions, the authors conclude that the results of Sampson and Raudenbush's study are not inconsistent with the broken windows thesis and therefore should not be used as empirical evidence against it.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44949156233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44949156233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2008.04.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2008.04.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:44949156233

VL - 36

SP - 240

EP - 243

JO - Journal of Criminal Justice

JF - Journal of Criminal Justice

SN - 0047-2352

IS - 3

ER -