Stacked crop rotations exploit weed-weed competition for sustainable weed management

Andrew J. Garrison, Adam D. Miller, Matthew R. Ryan, Stephen H. Roxburgh, Katriona Shea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Crop rotation has long been considered one of the simplest and most effective tools for managing weeds. In this paper, we demonstrate how crop rotations can be strategically arranged to harness a novel mechanism of weed suppression: weed-weed competition. Specifically, we consider how crop stacking, or increasing the number of consecutive plantings of a single crop within a rotation, can decrease the size of the weed seed bank, by forcing weeds to compete with each other in similar environments for longer periods of time, while still reaping the traditional benefits of crop rotation. Using an annual plant model, we investigate the theoretical effects of stacked crop rotations on weeds that have different life-history strategies and phenology. Our results show that when weeds compete within a season, stacking can reduce the weed seed bank compared to rotations without stacked crops. Although more research is needed to fully understand the effects of crop stacking on other aspects of the system, such as insect pests and diseases, our research suggests that crop stacking has the potential to improve weed suppression without additional inputs, and their associated costs and externalities. More generally, improving management by changing the temporal arrangement of disturbances is a novel, process-based approach that could likely be applied to other weed management practices, such as mowing and herbicide application, and which could involve mechanisms other than weed-weed competition. Leveraging this new application of existing ecological theory to improve weed management strategies holds great promise.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)166-176
Number of pages11
JournalWeed Science
Volume62
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

crop-weed competition
weed control
weeds
crops
buried seeds
insect diseases
harness
mowing
insect pests
pesticide application
phenology
life history
planting

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Plant Science

Cite this

Garrison, Andrew J. ; Miller, Adam D. ; Ryan, Matthew R. ; Roxburgh, Stephen H. ; Shea, Katriona. / Stacked crop rotations exploit weed-weed competition for sustainable weed management. In: Weed Science. 2014 ; Vol. 62, No. 1. pp. 166-176.
@article{89fc2fa261be40d5baaa995502bd656d,
title = "Stacked crop rotations exploit weed-weed competition for sustainable weed management",
abstract = "Crop rotation has long been considered one of the simplest and most effective tools for managing weeds. In this paper, we demonstrate how crop rotations can be strategically arranged to harness a novel mechanism of weed suppression: weed-weed competition. Specifically, we consider how crop stacking, or increasing the number of consecutive plantings of a single crop within a rotation, can decrease the size of the weed seed bank, by forcing weeds to compete with each other in similar environments for longer periods of time, while still reaping the traditional benefits of crop rotation. Using an annual plant model, we investigate the theoretical effects of stacked crop rotations on weeds that have different life-history strategies and phenology. Our results show that when weeds compete within a season, stacking can reduce the weed seed bank compared to rotations without stacked crops. Although more research is needed to fully understand the effects of crop stacking on other aspects of the system, such as insect pests and diseases, our research suggests that crop stacking has the potential to improve weed suppression without additional inputs, and their associated costs and externalities. More generally, improving management by changing the temporal arrangement of disturbances is a novel, process-based approach that could likely be applied to other weed management practices, such as mowing and herbicide application, and which could involve mechanisms other than weed-weed competition. Leveraging this new application of existing ecological theory to improve weed management strategies holds great promise.",
author = "Garrison, {Andrew J.} and Miller, {Adam D.} and Ryan, {Matthew R.} and Roxburgh, {Stephen H.} and Katriona Shea",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1614/WS-D-13-00037.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "166--176",
journal = "Weed Science",
issn = "0043-1745",
publisher = "Weed Science Society of America",
number = "1",

}

Stacked crop rotations exploit weed-weed competition for sustainable weed management. / Garrison, Andrew J.; Miller, Adam D.; Ryan, Matthew R.; Roxburgh, Stephen H.; Shea, Katriona.

In: Weed Science, Vol. 62, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 166-176.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stacked crop rotations exploit weed-weed competition for sustainable weed management

AU - Garrison, Andrew J.

AU - Miller, Adam D.

AU - Ryan, Matthew R.

AU - Roxburgh, Stephen H.

AU - Shea, Katriona

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Crop rotation has long been considered one of the simplest and most effective tools for managing weeds. In this paper, we demonstrate how crop rotations can be strategically arranged to harness a novel mechanism of weed suppression: weed-weed competition. Specifically, we consider how crop stacking, or increasing the number of consecutive plantings of a single crop within a rotation, can decrease the size of the weed seed bank, by forcing weeds to compete with each other in similar environments for longer periods of time, while still reaping the traditional benefits of crop rotation. Using an annual plant model, we investigate the theoretical effects of stacked crop rotations on weeds that have different life-history strategies and phenology. Our results show that when weeds compete within a season, stacking can reduce the weed seed bank compared to rotations without stacked crops. Although more research is needed to fully understand the effects of crop stacking on other aspects of the system, such as insect pests and diseases, our research suggests that crop stacking has the potential to improve weed suppression without additional inputs, and their associated costs and externalities. More generally, improving management by changing the temporal arrangement of disturbances is a novel, process-based approach that could likely be applied to other weed management practices, such as mowing and herbicide application, and which could involve mechanisms other than weed-weed competition. Leveraging this new application of existing ecological theory to improve weed management strategies holds great promise.

AB - Crop rotation has long been considered one of the simplest and most effective tools for managing weeds. In this paper, we demonstrate how crop rotations can be strategically arranged to harness a novel mechanism of weed suppression: weed-weed competition. Specifically, we consider how crop stacking, or increasing the number of consecutive plantings of a single crop within a rotation, can decrease the size of the weed seed bank, by forcing weeds to compete with each other in similar environments for longer periods of time, while still reaping the traditional benefits of crop rotation. Using an annual plant model, we investigate the theoretical effects of stacked crop rotations on weeds that have different life-history strategies and phenology. Our results show that when weeds compete within a season, stacking can reduce the weed seed bank compared to rotations without stacked crops. Although more research is needed to fully understand the effects of crop stacking on other aspects of the system, such as insect pests and diseases, our research suggests that crop stacking has the potential to improve weed suppression without additional inputs, and their associated costs and externalities. More generally, improving management by changing the temporal arrangement of disturbances is a novel, process-based approach that could likely be applied to other weed management practices, such as mowing and herbicide application, and which could involve mechanisms other than weed-weed competition. Leveraging this new application of existing ecological theory to improve weed management strategies holds great promise.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893094004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893094004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1614/WS-D-13-00037.1

DO - 10.1614/WS-D-13-00037.1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84893094004

VL - 62

SP - 166

EP - 176

JO - Weed Science

JF - Weed Science

SN - 0043-1745

IS - 1

ER -