Stage II breast cancer: Differences between four coping patterns in side effects during adjuvant chemotherapy

Daniel E. Shapiro, Stephen R. Boggs, James R. Rodrigue, Heather L. Urry, James J. Algina, Richard Hellman, Fay Ewen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fifty-six women with stage II breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were recruited for a study evaluating and comparing coping patterns for differences in physical and psychological side effects during treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy. Cluster analyses were used to split women into confrontive, avoidant-confrontive, avoidant-resigned, and resigned coping clusters. Side-effect measurements were taken on the day of adjuvant chemotherapy infusion and 3 and 7 days later. Repeated measures ANCOVAs indicated that coping clusters predicted significant variance in physical, psychological, and total side effects when variance in covariates was held constant. Confrontive subjects reported significantly fewer psychological and physical symptoms than avoidant-confrontive and avoidant-resigned copers. Confrontive copers also reported fewer side effects than resigned copers, but this difference was not significant when differences in covariate distributions were controlled. Particularly robust differences were noted when confrontive copers were compared with avoidant-confrontive copers. Results suggest that a critical component in optimal coping may be a willingness to discuss and think about illness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)143-157
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997

Fingerprint

Adjuvant Chemotherapy
Breast Neoplasms
Psychology
Cluster Analysis
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Shapiro, Daniel E. ; Boggs, Stephen R. ; Rodrigue, James R. ; Urry, Heather L. ; Algina, James J. ; Hellman, Richard ; Ewen, Fay. / Stage II breast cancer : Differences between four coping patterns in side effects during adjuvant chemotherapy. In: Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 1997 ; Vol. 43, No. 2. pp. 143-157.
@article{44c50a5604804f01b1a12c2cc4945c16,
title = "Stage II breast cancer: Differences between four coping patterns in side effects during adjuvant chemotherapy",
abstract = "Fifty-six women with stage II breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were recruited for a study evaluating and comparing coping patterns for differences in physical and psychological side effects during treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy. Cluster analyses were used to split women into confrontive, avoidant-confrontive, avoidant-resigned, and resigned coping clusters. Side-effect measurements were taken on the day of adjuvant chemotherapy infusion and 3 and 7 days later. Repeated measures ANCOVAs indicated that coping clusters predicted significant variance in physical, psychological, and total side effects when variance in covariates was held constant. Confrontive subjects reported significantly fewer psychological and physical symptoms than avoidant-confrontive and avoidant-resigned copers. Confrontive copers also reported fewer side effects than resigned copers, but this difference was not significant when differences in covariate distributions were controlled. Particularly robust differences were noted when confrontive copers were compared with avoidant-confrontive copers. Results suggest that a critical component in optimal coping may be a willingness to discuss and think about illness.",
author = "Shapiro, {Daniel E.} and Boggs, {Stephen R.} and Rodrigue, {James R.} and Urry, {Heather L.} and Algina, {James J.} and Richard Hellman and Fay Ewen",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0022-3999(97)80001-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "143--157",
journal = "Journal of Psychosomatic Research",
issn = "0022-3999",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Stage II breast cancer : Differences between four coping patterns in side effects during adjuvant chemotherapy. / Shapiro, Daniel E.; Boggs, Stephen R.; Rodrigue, James R.; Urry, Heather L.; Algina, James J.; Hellman, Richard; Ewen, Fay.

In: Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Vol. 43, No. 2, 01.01.1997, p. 143-157.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stage II breast cancer

T2 - Differences between four coping patterns in side effects during adjuvant chemotherapy

AU - Shapiro, Daniel E.

AU - Boggs, Stephen R.

AU - Rodrigue, James R.

AU - Urry, Heather L.

AU - Algina, James J.

AU - Hellman, Richard

AU - Ewen, Fay

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - Fifty-six women with stage II breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were recruited for a study evaluating and comparing coping patterns for differences in physical and psychological side effects during treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy. Cluster analyses were used to split women into confrontive, avoidant-confrontive, avoidant-resigned, and resigned coping clusters. Side-effect measurements were taken on the day of adjuvant chemotherapy infusion and 3 and 7 days later. Repeated measures ANCOVAs indicated that coping clusters predicted significant variance in physical, psychological, and total side effects when variance in covariates was held constant. Confrontive subjects reported significantly fewer psychological and physical symptoms than avoidant-confrontive and avoidant-resigned copers. Confrontive copers also reported fewer side effects than resigned copers, but this difference was not significant when differences in covariate distributions were controlled. Particularly robust differences were noted when confrontive copers were compared with avoidant-confrontive copers. Results suggest that a critical component in optimal coping may be a willingness to discuss and think about illness.

AB - Fifty-six women with stage II breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were recruited for a study evaluating and comparing coping patterns for differences in physical and psychological side effects during treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy. Cluster analyses were used to split women into confrontive, avoidant-confrontive, avoidant-resigned, and resigned coping clusters. Side-effect measurements were taken on the day of adjuvant chemotherapy infusion and 3 and 7 days later. Repeated measures ANCOVAs indicated that coping clusters predicted significant variance in physical, psychological, and total side effects when variance in covariates was held constant. Confrontive subjects reported significantly fewer psychological and physical symptoms than avoidant-confrontive and avoidant-resigned copers. Confrontive copers also reported fewer side effects than resigned copers, but this difference was not significant when differences in covariate distributions were controlled. Particularly robust differences were noted when confrontive copers were compared with avoidant-confrontive copers. Results suggest that a critical component in optimal coping may be a willingness to discuss and think about illness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031213796&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031213796&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-3999(97)80001-3

DO - 10.1016/S0022-3999(97)80001-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 9278904

AN - SCOPUS:0031213796

VL - 43

SP - 143

EP - 157

JO - Journal of Psychosomatic Research

JF - Journal of Psychosomatic Research

SN - 0022-3999

IS - 2

ER -