Stair climbing elicits a lower cardiovascular demand than walking in claudication patients

Andrew Gardner, J. S. Skinner, C. X. Bryant, L. K. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. Peripheral arterial disease patients limited by claudication pain frequently have concomitant cardiovascular problems during exercise, such as hypertension and myocardial ischemia. Thus, for testing and rehabilitation purposes, exercise which elicits lower heart rate and blood pressure at a given metabolic intensity would be preferred over a more demanding task. The purpose of this study was to compare the cardiovascular responses of claudication patients during walking and stair climbing at a similar level of oxygen uptake. Methods. Ten patients limited by claudication pain performed treadmill walking and stair climbing tests. Results. Oxygen uptake was similar (P >.05) during walking and stair climbing (13.7 vs. 13.5 mL/kg/min, respectively). The times to onset and to maximal claudication pain, as well as the peripheral hemodynamic measurements of ankle systolic pressure, ankle- to-brachial systolic pressure index, and foot transcutaneous oxygen tension were also similar between the two tests (P >.05). However, heart rate, systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, mean arterial pressure, and rate- pressure product values were lower during and following stair climbing than compared to walking (P <.05). Conclusion. Stair climbing may offer an advantage over treadmill walking for claudication patients because similar metabolic, claudication, and peripheral hemodynamic measurements are obtained with concomitantly less demand placed on the cardiovascular system. The stair climbing test was well tolerated and safely performed by each patient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)134-142
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995

Fingerprint

Walking
Blood Pressure
Oxygen
Ankle
Pain
Heart Rate
Hemodynamics
Exercise Therapy
Peripheral Arterial Disease
Cardiovascular System
Myocardial Ischemia
Stair Climbing
Foot
Arterial Pressure
Arm
Exercise
Hypertension
Pressure

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{58d314865ae54980ac49c1809d8b62d9,
title = "Stair climbing elicits a lower cardiovascular demand than walking in claudication patients",
abstract = "Purpose. Peripheral arterial disease patients limited by claudication pain frequently have concomitant cardiovascular problems during exercise, such as hypertension and myocardial ischemia. Thus, for testing and rehabilitation purposes, exercise which elicits lower heart rate and blood pressure at a given metabolic intensity would be preferred over a more demanding task. The purpose of this study was to compare the cardiovascular responses of claudication patients during walking and stair climbing at a similar level of oxygen uptake. Methods. Ten patients limited by claudication pain performed treadmill walking and stair climbing tests. Results. Oxygen uptake was similar (P >.05) during walking and stair climbing (13.7 vs. 13.5 mL/kg/min, respectively). The times to onset and to maximal claudication pain, as well as the peripheral hemodynamic measurements of ankle systolic pressure, ankle- to-brachial systolic pressure index, and foot transcutaneous oxygen tension were also similar between the two tests (P >.05). However, heart rate, systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, mean arterial pressure, and rate- pressure product values were lower during and following stair climbing than compared to walking (P <.05). Conclusion. Stair climbing may offer an advantage over treadmill walking for claudication patients because similar metabolic, claudication, and peripheral hemodynamic measurements are obtained with concomitantly less demand placed on the cardiovascular system. The stair climbing test was well tolerated and safely performed by each patient.",
author = "Andrew Gardner and Skinner, {J. S.} and Bryant, {C. X.} and Smith, {L. K.}",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00008483-199503000-00007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "134--142",
journal = "Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention",
issn = "1932-7501",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

Stair climbing elicits a lower cardiovascular demand than walking in claudication patients. / Gardner, Andrew; Skinner, J. S.; Bryant, C. X.; Smith, L. K.

In: Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, Vol. 15, No. 2, 01.01.1995, p. 134-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stair climbing elicits a lower cardiovascular demand than walking in claudication patients

AU - Gardner, Andrew

AU - Skinner, J. S.

AU - Bryant, C. X.

AU - Smith, L. K.

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - Purpose. Peripheral arterial disease patients limited by claudication pain frequently have concomitant cardiovascular problems during exercise, such as hypertension and myocardial ischemia. Thus, for testing and rehabilitation purposes, exercise which elicits lower heart rate and blood pressure at a given metabolic intensity would be preferred over a more demanding task. The purpose of this study was to compare the cardiovascular responses of claudication patients during walking and stair climbing at a similar level of oxygen uptake. Methods. Ten patients limited by claudication pain performed treadmill walking and stair climbing tests. Results. Oxygen uptake was similar (P >.05) during walking and stair climbing (13.7 vs. 13.5 mL/kg/min, respectively). The times to onset and to maximal claudication pain, as well as the peripheral hemodynamic measurements of ankle systolic pressure, ankle- to-brachial systolic pressure index, and foot transcutaneous oxygen tension were also similar between the two tests (P >.05). However, heart rate, systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, mean arterial pressure, and rate- pressure product values were lower during and following stair climbing than compared to walking (P <.05). Conclusion. Stair climbing may offer an advantage over treadmill walking for claudication patients because similar metabolic, claudication, and peripheral hemodynamic measurements are obtained with concomitantly less demand placed on the cardiovascular system. The stair climbing test was well tolerated and safely performed by each patient.

AB - Purpose. Peripheral arterial disease patients limited by claudication pain frequently have concomitant cardiovascular problems during exercise, such as hypertension and myocardial ischemia. Thus, for testing and rehabilitation purposes, exercise which elicits lower heart rate and blood pressure at a given metabolic intensity would be preferred over a more demanding task. The purpose of this study was to compare the cardiovascular responses of claudication patients during walking and stair climbing at a similar level of oxygen uptake. Methods. Ten patients limited by claudication pain performed treadmill walking and stair climbing tests. Results. Oxygen uptake was similar (P >.05) during walking and stair climbing (13.7 vs. 13.5 mL/kg/min, respectively). The times to onset and to maximal claudication pain, as well as the peripheral hemodynamic measurements of ankle systolic pressure, ankle- to-brachial systolic pressure index, and foot transcutaneous oxygen tension were also similar between the two tests (P >.05). However, heart rate, systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, mean arterial pressure, and rate- pressure product values were lower during and following stair climbing than compared to walking (P <.05). Conclusion. Stair climbing may offer an advantage over treadmill walking for claudication patients because similar metabolic, claudication, and peripheral hemodynamic measurements are obtained with concomitantly less demand placed on the cardiovascular system. The stair climbing test was well tolerated and safely performed by each patient.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028922079&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028922079&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00008483-199503000-00007

DO - 10.1097/00008483-199503000-00007

M3 - Article

C2 - 8542517

AN - SCOPUS:0028922079

VL - 15

SP - 134

EP - 142

JO - Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention

JF - Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention

SN - 1932-7501

IS - 2

ER -