State experiences with implementing the cash and counseling demonstration and evaluation project

Mark Sciegaj, Kevin Mahoney, Kristen Simone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Cash and Counseling Demonstration and Evaluation (CCDE) tested one of the most autonomous forms of consumer direction for personal assistance services. In the winter of 1996/97, Arkansas, Florida, New Jersey, and New York each received grants to develop and implement CCDE. While Arkansas, Florida, and New Jersey were successful in their efforts of implementing CCDE, New York was unable to do so. Using elements of Hasenfeld and Brock's (1991) political economy policy implementation model, the following sections describe two primary interactions between key policy implementation instruments and internal and external stakeholders that made New York's participation in CCDE not possible. This case study also provides some lessons for other states interested in developing Cash and Counseling models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)81-98
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Aging and Social Policy
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 31 2008

Fingerprint

Counseling
counseling
evaluation
policy implementation
experience
Organized Financing
grant
political economy
assistance
stakeholder
participation
interaction

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Demography
  • Gerontology
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

@article{ffc8f387892b4d40818c28264a383c13,
title = "State experiences with implementing the cash and counseling demonstration and evaluation project",
abstract = "The Cash and Counseling Demonstration and Evaluation (CCDE) tested one of the most autonomous forms of consumer direction for personal assistance services. In the winter of 1996/97, Arkansas, Florida, New Jersey, and New York each received grants to develop and implement CCDE. While Arkansas, Florida, and New Jersey were successful in their efforts of implementing CCDE, New York was unable to do so. Using elements of Hasenfeld and Brock's (1991) political economy policy implementation model, the following sections describe two primary interactions between key policy implementation instruments and internal and external stakeholders that made New York's participation in CCDE not possible. This case study also provides some lessons for other states interested in developing Cash and Counseling models.",
author = "Mark Sciegaj and Kevin Mahoney and Kristen Simone",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1300/J031v20n01_05",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "81--98",
journal = "Journal of Aging and Social Policy",
issn = "0895-9420",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

State experiences with implementing the cash and counseling demonstration and evaluation project. / Sciegaj, Mark; Mahoney, Kevin; Simone, Kristen.

In: Journal of Aging and Social Policy, Vol. 20, No. 1, 31.01.2008, p. 81-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - State experiences with implementing the cash and counseling demonstration and evaluation project

AU - Sciegaj, Mark

AU - Mahoney, Kevin

AU - Simone, Kristen

PY - 2008/1/31

Y1 - 2008/1/31

N2 - The Cash and Counseling Demonstration and Evaluation (CCDE) tested one of the most autonomous forms of consumer direction for personal assistance services. In the winter of 1996/97, Arkansas, Florida, New Jersey, and New York each received grants to develop and implement CCDE. While Arkansas, Florida, and New Jersey were successful in their efforts of implementing CCDE, New York was unable to do so. Using elements of Hasenfeld and Brock's (1991) political economy policy implementation model, the following sections describe two primary interactions between key policy implementation instruments and internal and external stakeholders that made New York's participation in CCDE not possible. This case study also provides some lessons for other states interested in developing Cash and Counseling models.

AB - The Cash and Counseling Demonstration and Evaluation (CCDE) tested one of the most autonomous forms of consumer direction for personal assistance services. In the winter of 1996/97, Arkansas, Florida, New Jersey, and New York each received grants to develop and implement CCDE. While Arkansas, Florida, and New Jersey were successful in their efforts of implementing CCDE, New York was unable to do so. Using elements of Hasenfeld and Brock's (1991) political economy policy implementation model, the following sections describe two primary interactions between key policy implementation instruments and internal and external stakeholders that made New York's participation in CCDE not possible. This case study also provides some lessons for other states interested in developing Cash and Counseling models.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38549108409&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38549108409&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1300/J031v20n01_05

DO - 10.1300/J031v20n01_05

M3 - Article

C2 - 18198161

AN - SCOPUS:38549108409

VL - 20

SP - 81

EP - 98

JO - Journal of Aging and Social Policy

JF - Journal of Aging and Social Policy

SN - 0895-9420

IS - 1

ER -