State Interest Group Research and the Mixed Legacy of Belle Zeller

Virginia Gray, David Lynn Lowery

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How well are the state- and national-level literatures on interest representation connected? We identify landmark studies at both levels and conclude that there is little cross-fertilization between them. Rather, the landmark state studies are more descriptive, and focus on a trade-off between group and party power, reflecting the legacy of Belle Zeller, while the national-level studies are embedded in theories used in the broader discipline and, therefore, focus on different processes. One consequence of this is that the national literature does not cite state-level studies very often. We conclude with recommendations for enhancing the impact and theoretical contribution of the state literature on interest organizations and the politics of interest representation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)388-410
Number of pages23
JournalState Politics & Policy Quarterly
Volume2
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

interest group
representation of interests
politics
literature
Interest Groups
Landmarks
Group
National Literature
Descriptive

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Gray, Virginia ; Lowery, David Lynn. / State Interest Group Research and the Mixed Legacy of Belle Zeller. In: State Politics & Policy Quarterly. 2007 ; Vol. 2, No. 4. pp. 388-410.
@article{812ba0eb094d4f71ad3613ded1d04537,
title = "State Interest Group Research and the Mixed Legacy of Belle Zeller",
abstract = "How well are the state- and national-level literatures on interest representation connected? We identify landmark studies at both levels and conclude that there is little cross-fertilization between them. Rather, the landmark state studies are more descriptive, and focus on a trade-off between group and party power, reflecting the legacy of Belle Zeller, while the national-level studies are embedded in theories used in the broader discipline and, therefore, focus on different processes. One consequence of this is that the national literature does not cite state-level studies very often. We conclude with recommendations for enhancing the impact and theoretical contribution of the state literature on interest organizations and the politics of interest representation.",
author = "Virginia Gray and Lowery, {David Lynn}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/153244000200200404",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "388--410",
journal = "State Politics and Policy Quarterly",
issn = "1532-4400",
publisher = "University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign",
number = "4",

}

State Interest Group Research and the Mixed Legacy of Belle Zeller. / Gray, Virginia; Lowery, David Lynn.

In: State Politics & Policy Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 4, 01.01.2007, p. 388-410.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - State Interest Group Research and the Mixed Legacy of Belle Zeller

AU - Gray, Virginia

AU - Lowery, David Lynn

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - How well are the state- and national-level literatures on interest representation connected? We identify landmark studies at both levels and conclude that there is little cross-fertilization between them. Rather, the landmark state studies are more descriptive, and focus on a trade-off between group and party power, reflecting the legacy of Belle Zeller, while the national-level studies are embedded in theories used in the broader discipline and, therefore, focus on different processes. One consequence of this is that the national literature does not cite state-level studies very often. We conclude with recommendations for enhancing the impact and theoretical contribution of the state literature on interest organizations and the politics of interest representation.

AB - How well are the state- and national-level literatures on interest representation connected? We identify landmark studies at both levels and conclude that there is little cross-fertilization between them. Rather, the landmark state studies are more descriptive, and focus on a trade-off between group and party power, reflecting the legacy of Belle Zeller, while the national-level studies are embedded in theories used in the broader discipline and, therefore, focus on different processes. One consequence of this is that the national literature does not cite state-level studies very often. We conclude with recommendations for enhancing the impact and theoretical contribution of the state literature on interest organizations and the politics of interest representation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84993783369&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84993783369&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/153244000200200404

DO - 10.1177/153244000200200404

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84993783369

VL - 2

SP - 388

EP - 410

JO - State Politics and Policy Quarterly

JF - State Politics and Policy Quarterly

SN - 1532-4400

IS - 4

ER -