State legitimacy and terrorism: Implications for counterterrorism policy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose- Scholars often suggest that violent extremism or terrorism- "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence to attain a political, economic, religious or social goal through fear, coercion or intimidation" (LaFree, G., & Dugan, L. (2007). Introducing the Global Terrorism Database. Terrorism and Political Violence, 19, 181-204, 184)- is a battle for legitimacy. However, the ambiguous definition of legitimacy often makes its application to counterterrorism measures difficult at best. The purpose of this chapter is to define legitimacy to connect policies designed to counter violent extremism. Methodology/approach- The main impediment in the study of the influence of legitimacy on terrorism is the debate over the meaning and measurement of legitimacy. This debate is reviewed, and a recent resolution is presented, grouping the many conceptualizations of legitimacy into three broad categories and identifying empirical indicators for each. These categories are then used to distinguish counterterrorism policies that can be used to boost legitimacy. Originality/value- This chapter organizes counterterrorism policies into a recently developed framework as a tool for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)241-259
Number of pages19
JournalSociology of Crime Law and Deviance
Volume20
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

terrorism
legitimacy
radicalism
political violence
grouping
violence
anxiety
methodology
economics
Values

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cultural Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

@article{c102b1315e42458b8449ee35aa550fa2,
title = "State legitimacy and terrorism: Implications for counterterrorism policy",
abstract = "Purpose- Scholars often suggest that violent extremism or terrorism- {"}the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence to attain a political, economic, religious or social goal through fear, coercion or intimidation{"} (LaFree, G., & Dugan, L. (2007). Introducing the Global Terrorism Database. Terrorism and Political Violence, 19, 181-204, 184)- is a battle for legitimacy. However, the ambiguous definition of legitimacy often makes its application to counterterrorism measures difficult at best. The purpose of this chapter is to define legitimacy to connect policies designed to counter violent extremism. Methodology/approach- The main impediment in the study of the influence of legitimacy on terrorism is the debate over the meaning and measurement of legitimacy. This debate is reviewed, and a recent resolution is presented, grouping the many conceptualizations of legitimacy into three broad categories and identifying empirical indicators for each. These categories are then used to distinguish counterterrorism policies that can be used to boost legitimacy. Originality/value- This chapter organizes counterterrorism policies into a recently developed framework as a tool for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers.",
author = "Gibbs, {Jennifer Catherine}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/S1521-613620150000020012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "241--259",
journal = "Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance",
issn = "1521-6136",
publisher = "JAI Press",

}

State legitimacy and terrorism : Implications for counterterrorism policy. / Gibbs, Jennifer Catherine.

In: Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance, Vol. 20, 01.01.2015, p. 241-259.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - State legitimacy and terrorism

T2 - Implications for counterterrorism policy

AU - Gibbs, Jennifer Catherine

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Purpose- Scholars often suggest that violent extremism or terrorism- "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence to attain a political, economic, religious or social goal through fear, coercion or intimidation" (LaFree, G., & Dugan, L. (2007). Introducing the Global Terrorism Database. Terrorism and Political Violence, 19, 181-204, 184)- is a battle for legitimacy. However, the ambiguous definition of legitimacy often makes its application to counterterrorism measures difficult at best. The purpose of this chapter is to define legitimacy to connect policies designed to counter violent extremism. Methodology/approach- The main impediment in the study of the influence of legitimacy on terrorism is the debate over the meaning and measurement of legitimacy. This debate is reviewed, and a recent resolution is presented, grouping the many conceptualizations of legitimacy into three broad categories and identifying empirical indicators for each. These categories are then used to distinguish counterterrorism policies that can be used to boost legitimacy. Originality/value- This chapter organizes counterterrorism policies into a recently developed framework as a tool for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers.

AB - Purpose- Scholars often suggest that violent extremism or terrorism- "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence to attain a political, economic, religious or social goal through fear, coercion or intimidation" (LaFree, G., & Dugan, L. (2007). Introducing the Global Terrorism Database. Terrorism and Political Violence, 19, 181-204, 184)- is a battle for legitimacy. However, the ambiguous definition of legitimacy often makes its application to counterterrorism measures difficult at best. The purpose of this chapter is to define legitimacy to connect policies designed to counter violent extremism. Methodology/approach- The main impediment in the study of the influence of legitimacy on terrorism is the debate over the meaning and measurement of legitimacy. This debate is reviewed, and a recent resolution is presented, grouping the many conceptualizations of legitimacy into three broad categories and identifying empirical indicators for each. These categories are then used to distinguish counterterrorism policies that can be used to boost legitimacy. Originality/value- This chapter organizes counterterrorism policies into a recently developed framework as a tool for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941568233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941568233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/S1521-613620150000020012

DO - 10.1108/S1521-613620150000020012

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84941568233

VL - 20

SP - 241

EP - 259

JO - Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance

JF - Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance

SN - 1521-6136

ER -