State lobby registration data

The anomalous case of Florida (and Minnesota too!)

Holly Brasher, David Lynn Lowery, Virginia Gray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Florida's lobbying community was anomalously large in 1990, a problem that threatens to undermine more general interpretations of the density of state interest systems. We use time series and cross-sectional data to better understand just what happened in Florida. Two explanations are examined, one focusing on changes in lobbying regulations, and the other based on a population ecology interpretation of Florida's battle over the sales tax on services and what should replace it. The data provide circumstantial support for the latter account, which suggests that Florida is anomalous only in the extremity of the conditions governing the size of its interest community in the late 1980s, not the conditions themselves.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)303-314
Number of pages12
JournalLegislative Studies Quarterly
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1999

Fingerprint

lobby
interpretation
taxes
community
sales
time series
ecology
regulation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Brasher, Holly ; Lowery, David Lynn ; Gray, Virginia. / State lobby registration data : The anomalous case of Florida (and Minnesota too!). In: Legislative Studies Quarterly. 1999 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 303-314.
@article{18d201686a4c441c829027655c194f0a,
title = "State lobby registration data: The anomalous case of Florida (and Minnesota too!)",
abstract = "Florida's lobbying community was anomalously large in 1990, a problem that threatens to undermine more general interpretations of the density of state interest systems. We use time series and cross-sectional data to better understand just what happened in Florida. Two explanations are examined, one focusing on changes in lobbying regulations, and the other based on a population ecology interpretation of Florida's battle over the sales tax on services and what should replace it. The data provide circumstantial support for the latter account, which suggests that Florida is anomalous only in the extremity of the conditions governing the size of its interest community in the late 1980s, not the conditions themselves.",
author = "Holly Brasher and Lowery, {David Lynn} and Virginia Gray",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2307/440313",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "303--314",
journal = "Legislative Studies Quarterly",
issn = "0362-9805",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

State lobby registration data : The anomalous case of Florida (and Minnesota too!). / Brasher, Holly; Lowery, David Lynn; Gray, Virginia.

In: Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 2, 01.01.1999, p. 303-314.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - State lobby registration data

T2 - The anomalous case of Florida (and Minnesota too!)

AU - Brasher, Holly

AU - Lowery, David Lynn

AU - Gray, Virginia

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - Florida's lobbying community was anomalously large in 1990, a problem that threatens to undermine more general interpretations of the density of state interest systems. We use time series and cross-sectional data to better understand just what happened in Florida. Two explanations are examined, one focusing on changes in lobbying regulations, and the other based on a population ecology interpretation of Florida's battle over the sales tax on services and what should replace it. The data provide circumstantial support for the latter account, which suggests that Florida is anomalous only in the extremity of the conditions governing the size of its interest community in the late 1980s, not the conditions themselves.

AB - Florida's lobbying community was anomalously large in 1990, a problem that threatens to undermine more general interpretations of the density of state interest systems. We use time series and cross-sectional data to better understand just what happened in Florida. Two explanations are examined, one focusing on changes in lobbying regulations, and the other based on a population ecology interpretation of Florida's battle over the sales tax on services and what should replace it. The data provide circumstantial support for the latter account, which suggests that Florida is anomalous only in the extremity of the conditions governing the size of its interest community in the late 1980s, not the conditions themselves.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038957797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038957797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/440313

DO - 10.2307/440313

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 303

EP - 314

JO - Legislative Studies Quarterly

JF - Legislative Studies Quarterly

SN - 0362-9805

IS - 2

ER -