State of the art of architectural engineering education as a contribution to the foundation for the National Agenda

A snapshot of four programs

Christopher H. Raebel, Fred Hasler, Ece Erdogmus, M. Kevin Parfitt

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Architectural Engineering education is a major component of the national agenda for the American Society of Civil Engineers. Well-educated graduates of architectural engineering programs are in high demand regionally, nationally, and internationally. The degree programs offered by universities are constantly evolving to remain current with, and ahead of, leading design firms and their design practices. This paper presents a brief look at four different undergraduate architectural engineering programs. The programs from Milwaukee School of Engineering, Kansas State University, University of Nebraska, and The Pennsylvania State University are presented. The programs range from a small, undergraduate focused program to a large, doctoral granting program. Each of these programs have been accredited by ABET for a long period of time, and each program has weathered changes to their undergraduate curriculum in recent years. Three focal points will be included in the comparison. First, the background of departmental faculty will be discussed. The universities considered are diverse, and the attraction, retention, and focus of the faculty differs among the programs evaluated. Next, examples of course offerings and course structure will be compared. The four universities offer very different degree program structures, and each structure presents its own advantages and difficulties. Finally, each program's senior capstone experience will be discussed and compared. The senior capstone experience is often a major component of an AE degree program, and it is also often a primary source for assessment of student outcomes. The capstone experience is a venue for showcasing students' educational maturity and professional readiness. Each university approaches the capstone experience in a different way, and both similarities and differences will be discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAEI 2019
Subtitle of host publicationIntegrated Building Solutions - The National Agenda - Proceedings of the Architectural Engineering National Conference 2019
EditorsMoses D. F. Ling, Robert M. Leicht, Ryan L. Solnosky
PublisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Pages174-180
Number of pages7
ISBN (Electronic)9780784482261
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019
EventArchitectural Engineering National Conference 2019: Integrated Building Solutions - The National Agenda, AEI 2019 - Tysons, United States
Duration: Apr 3 2019Apr 6 2019

Publication series

NameAEI 2019: Integrated Building Solutions - The National Agenda - Proceedings of the Architectural Engineering National Conference 2019

Conference

ConferenceArchitectural Engineering National Conference 2019: Integrated Building Solutions - The National Agenda, AEI 2019
CountryUnited States
CityTysons
Period4/3/194/6/19

Fingerprint

Engineering education
Students
Curricula
Engineers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Architecture

Cite this

Raebel, C. H., Hasler, F., Erdogmus, E., & Parfitt, M. K. (2019). State of the art of architectural engineering education as a contribution to the foundation for the National Agenda: A snapshot of four programs. In M. D. F. Ling, R. M. Leicht, & R. L. Solnosky (Eds.), AEI 2019: Integrated Building Solutions - The National Agenda - Proceedings of the Architectural Engineering National Conference 2019 (pp. 174-180). (AEI 2019: Integrated Building Solutions - The National Agenda - Proceedings of the Architectural Engineering National Conference 2019). American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482261.021
Raebel, Christopher H. ; Hasler, Fred ; Erdogmus, Ece ; Parfitt, M. Kevin. / State of the art of architectural engineering education as a contribution to the foundation for the National Agenda : A snapshot of four programs. AEI 2019: Integrated Building Solutions - The National Agenda - Proceedings of the Architectural Engineering National Conference 2019. editor / Moses D. F. Ling ; Robert M. Leicht ; Ryan L. Solnosky. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2019. pp. 174-180 (AEI 2019: Integrated Building Solutions - The National Agenda - Proceedings of the Architectural Engineering National Conference 2019).
@inproceedings{a923d76d25894747ba1137ca273d3274,
title = "State of the art of architectural engineering education as a contribution to the foundation for the National Agenda: A snapshot of four programs",
abstract = "Architectural Engineering education is a major component of the national agenda for the American Society of Civil Engineers. Well-educated graduates of architectural engineering programs are in high demand regionally, nationally, and internationally. The degree programs offered by universities are constantly evolving to remain current with, and ahead of, leading design firms and their design practices. This paper presents a brief look at four different undergraduate architectural engineering programs. The programs from Milwaukee School of Engineering, Kansas State University, University of Nebraska, and The Pennsylvania State University are presented. The programs range from a small, undergraduate focused program to a large, doctoral granting program. Each of these programs have been accredited by ABET for a long period of time, and each program has weathered changes to their undergraduate curriculum in recent years. Three focal points will be included in the comparison. First, the background of departmental faculty will be discussed. The universities considered are diverse, and the attraction, retention, and focus of the faculty differs among the programs evaluated. Next, examples of course offerings and course structure will be compared. The four universities offer very different degree program structures, and each structure presents its own advantages and difficulties. Finally, each program's senior capstone experience will be discussed and compared. The senior capstone experience is often a major component of an AE degree program, and it is also often a primary source for assessment of student outcomes. The capstone experience is a venue for showcasing students' educational maturity and professional readiness. Each university approaches the capstone experience in a different way, and both similarities and differences will be discussed.",
author = "Raebel, {Christopher H.} and Fred Hasler and Ece Erdogmus and Parfitt, {M. Kevin}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/9780784482261.021",
language = "English (US)",
series = "AEI 2019: Integrated Building Solutions - The National Agenda - Proceedings of the Architectural Engineering National Conference 2019",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
pages = "174--180",
editor = "Ling, {Moses D. F.} and Leicht, {Robert M.} and Solnosky, {Ryan L.}",
booktitle = "AEI 2019",
address = "United States",

}

Raebel, CH, Hasler, F, Erdogmus, E & Parfitt, MK 2019, State of the art of architectural engineering education as a contribution to the foundation for the National Agenda: A snapshot of four programs. in MDF Ling, RM Leicht & RL Solnosky (eds), AEI 2019: Integrated Building Solutions - The National Agenda - Proceedings of the Architectural Engineering National Conference 2019. AEI 2019: Integrated Building Solutions - The National Agenda - Proceedings of the Architectural Engineering National Conference 2019, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), pp. 174-180, Architectural Engineering National Conference 2019: Integrated Building Solutions - The National Agenda, AEI 2019, Tysons, United States, 4/3/19. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482261.021

State of the art of architectural engineering education as a contribution to the foundation for the National Agenda : A snapshot of four programs. / Raebel, Christopher H.; Hasler, Fred; Erdogmus, Ece; Parfitt, M. Kevin.

AEI 2019: Integrated Building Solutions - The National Agenda - Proceedings of the Architectural Engineering National Conference 2019. ed. / Moses D. F. Ling; Robert M. Leicht; Ryan L. Solnosky. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2019. p. 174-180 (AEI 2019: Integrated Building Solutions - The National Agenda - Proceedings of the Architectural Engineering National Conference 2019).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - State of the art of architectural engineering education as a contribution to the foundation for the National Agenda

T2 - A snapshot of four programs

AU - Raebel, Christopher H.

AU - Hasler, Fred

AU - Erdogmus, Ece

AU - Parfitt, M. Kevin

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Architectural Engineering education is a major component of the national agenda for the American Society of Civil Engineers. Well-educated graduates of architectural engineering programs are in high demand regionally, nationally, and internationally. The degree programs offered by universities are constantly evolving to remain current with, and ahead of, leading design firms and their design practices. This paper presents a brief look at four different undergraduate architectural engineering programs. The programs from Milwaukee School of Engineering, Kansas State University, University of Nebraska, and The Pennsylvania State University are presented. The programs range from a small, undergraduate focused program to a large, doctoral granting program. Each of these programs have been accredited by ABET for a long period of time, and each program has weathered changes to their undergraduate curriculum in recent years. Three focal points will be included in the comparison. First, the background of departmental faculty will be discussed. The universities considered are diverse, and the attraction, retention, and focus of the faculty differs among the programs evaluated. Next, examples of course offerings and course structure will be compared. The four universities offer very different degree program structures, and each structure presents its own advantages and difficulties. Finally, each program's senior capstone experience will be discussed and compared. The senior capstone experience is often a major component of an AE degree program, and it is also often a primary source for assessment of student outcomes. The capstone experience is a venue for showcasing students' educational maturity and professional readiness. Each university approaches the capstone experience in a different way, and both similarities and differences will be discussed.

AB - Architectural Engineering education is a major component of the national agenda for the American Society of Civil Engineers. Well-educated graduates of architectural engineering programs are in high demand regionally, nationally, and internationally. The degree programs offered by universities are constantly evolving to remain current with, and ahead of, leading design firms and their design practices. This paper presents a brief look at four different undergraduate architectural engineering programs. The programs from Milwaukee School of Engineering, Kansas State University, University of Nebraska, and The Pennsylvania State University are presented. The programs range from a small, undergraduate focused program to a large, doctoral granting program. Each of these programs have been accredited by ABET for a long period of time, and each program has weathered changes to their undergraduate curriculum in recent years. Three focal points will be included in the comparison. First, the background of departmental faculty will be discussed. The universities considered are diverse, and the attraction, retention, and focus of the faculty differs among the programs evaluated. Next, examples of course offerings and course structure will be compared. The four universities offer very different degree program structures, and each structure presents its own advantages and difficulties. Finally, each program's senior capstone experience will be discussed and compared. The senior capstone experience is often a major component of an AE degree program, and it is also often a primary source for assessment of student outcomes. The capstone experience is a venue for showcasing students' educational maturity and professional readiness. Each university approaches the capstone experience in a different way, and both similarities and differences will be discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064495249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064495249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/9780784482261.021

DO - 10.1061/9780784482261.021

M3 - Conference contribution

T3 - AEI 2019: Integrated Building Solutions - The National Agenda - Proceedings of the Architectural Engineering National Conference 2019

SP - 174

EP - 180

BT - AEI 2019

A2 - Ling, Moses D. F.

A2 - Leicht, Robert M.

A2 - Solnosky, Ryan L.

PB - American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)

ER -

Raebel CH, Hasler F, Erdogmus E, Parfitt MK. State of the art of architectural engineering education as a contribution to the foundation for the National Agenda: A snapshot of four programs. In Ling MDF, Leicht RM, Solnosky RL, editors, AEI 2019: Integrated Building Solutions - The National Agenda - Proceedings of the Architectural Engineering National Conference 2019. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 2019. p. 174-180. (AEI 2019: Integrated Building Solutions - The National Agenda - Proceedings of the Architectural Engineering National Conference 2019). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482261.021