Statistical analysis of SHAPE-directed RNA secondary structure modeling

Srinivas Ramachandran, Feng Ding, Kevin M. Weeks, Nikolay Dokholyan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ability to predict RNA secondary structure is fundamental for understanding and manipulating RNA function. The information obtained from selective 2′-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension (SHAPE) experiments greatly improves the accuracy of RNA secondary structure prediction. Recently, Das and colleagues [Kladwang, W., et al. (2011) Biochemistry50, 8049-8056] proposed a "bootstrapping" approach for estimating the variance and helix-by-helix confidence levels of predicted secondary structures based on resampling (randomizing and summing) the measured SHAPE data. We show that the specific resampling approach described by Kladwang et al. introduces systematic errors and underestimates confidence in secondary structure prediction using SHAPE data. Instead, a leave-data-out jackknife approach better estimates the influence of a given experimental data set on SHAPE-directed secondary structure modeling. Even when 35% of the data were left out in the jackknife approach, the confidence levels of SHAPE-directed secondary structure prediction were significantly higher than those calculated by Das and colleagues using bootstrapping. Helix confidence levels were thus underestimated in the recent study, and the resampling approach implemented by Kladwang et al. is not an appropriate metric for evaluating SHAPE-directed secondary structure modeling.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)596-599
Number of pages4
JournalBiochemistry
Volume52
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 29 2013

Fingerprint

Acylation
Hydroxyl Radical
Statistical methods
RNA
Systematic errors

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biochemistry

Cite this

Ramachandran, Srinivas ; Ding, Feng ; Weeks, Kevin M. ; Dokholyan, Nikolay. / Statistical analysis of SHAPE-directed RNA secondary structure modeling. In: Biochemistry. 2013 ; Vol. 52, No. 4. pp. 596-599.
@article{5daf7757ce364c73952010ba6debff2f,
title = "Statistical analysis of SHAPE-directed RNA secondary structure modeling",
abstract = "The ability to predict RNA secondary structure is fundamental for understanding and manipulating RNA function. The information obtained from selective 2′-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension (SHAPE) experiments greatly improves the accuracy of RNA secondary structure prediction. Recently, Das and colleagues [Kladwang, W., et al. (2011) Biochemistry50, 8049-8056] proposed a {"}bootstrapping{"} approach for estimating the variance and helix-by-helix confidence levels of predicted secondary structures based on resampling (randomizing and summing) the measured SHAPE data. We show that the specific resampling approach described by Kladwang et al. introduces systematic errors and underestimates confidence in secondary structure prediction using SHAPE data. Instead, a leave-data-out jackknife approach better estimates the influence of a given experimental data set on SHAPE-directed secondary structure modeling. Even when 35{\%} of the data were left out in the jackknife approach, the confidence levels of SHAPE-directed secondary structure prediction were significantly higher than those calculated by Das and colleagues using bootstrapping. Helix confidence levels were thus underestimated in the recent study, and the resampling approach implemented by Kladwang et al. is not an appropriate metric for evaluating SHAPE-directed secondary structure modeling.",
author = "Srinivas Ramachandran and Feng Ding and Weeks, {Kevin M.} and Nikolay Dokholyan",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1021/bi300756s",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "596--599",
journal = "Biochemistry",
issn = "0006-2960",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "4",

}

Statistical analysis of SHAPE-directed RNA secondary structure modeling. / Ramachandran, Srinivas; Ding, Feng; Weeks, Kevin M.; Dokholyan, Nikolay.

In: Biochemistry, Vol. 52, No. 4, 29.01.2013, p. 596-599.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Statistical analysis of SHAPE-directed RNA secondary structure modeling

AU - Ramachandran, Srinivas

AU - Ding, Feng

AU - Weeks, Kevin M.

AU - Dokholyan, Nikolay

PY - 2013/1/29

Y1 - 2013/1/29

N2 - The ability to predict RNA secondary structure is fundamental for understanding and manipulating RNA function. The information obtained from selective 2′-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension (SHAPE) experiments greatly improves the accuracy of RNA secondary structure prediction. Recently, Das and colleagues [Kladwang, W., et al. (2011) Biochemistry50, 8049-8056] proposed a "bootstrapping" approach for estimating the variance and helix-by-helix confidence levels of predicted secondary structures based on resampling (randomizing and summing) the measured SHAPE data. We show that the specific resampling approach described by Kladwang et al. introduces systematic errors and underestimates confidence in secondary structure prediction using SHAPE data. Instead, a leave-data-out jackknife approach better estimates the influence of a given experimental data set on SHAPE-directed secondary structure modeling. Even when 35% of the data were left out in the jackknife approach, the confidence levels of SHAPE-directed secondary structure prediction were significantly higher than those calculated by Das and colleagues using bootstrapping. Helix confidence levels were thus underestimated in the recent study, and the resampling approach implemented by Kladwang et al. is not an appropriate metric for evaluating SHAPE-directed secondary structure modeling.

AB - The ability to predict RNA secondary structure is fundamental for understanding and manipulating RNA function. The information obtained from selective 2′-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension (SHAPE) experiments greatly improves the accuracy of RNA secondary structure prediction. Recently, Das and colleagues [Kladwang, W., et al. (2011) Biochemistry50, 8049-8056] proposed a "bootstrapping" approach for estimating the variance and helix-by-helix confidence levels of predicted secondary structures based on resampling (randomizing and summing) the measured SHAPE data. We show that the specific resampling approach described by Kladwang et al. introduces systematic errors and underestimates confidence in secondary structure prediction using SHAPE data. Instead, a leave-data-out jackknife approach better estimates the influence of a given experimental data set on SHAPE-directed secondary structure modeling. Even when 35% of the data were left out in the jackknife approach, the confidence levels of SHAPE-directed secondary structure prediction were significantly higher than those calculated by Das and colleagues using bootstrapping. Helix confidence levels were thus underestimated in the recent study, and the resampling approach implemented by Kladwang et al. is not an appropriate metric for evaluating SHAPE-directed secondary structure modeling.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873844807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873844807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/bi300756s

DO - 10.1021/bi300756s

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 596

EP - 599

JO - Biochemistry

JF - Biochemistry

SN - 0006-2960

IS - 4

ER -