Statistical evidence of discrimination

David Kaye

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Generally speaking, laws against discrimination prohibit treating similarly situated persons differently. Legal analysis or social policy supplies the criteria for ascertaining which persons are similarly situated. Statistical evidence has been used in cases, among others, alleging discrimination in criminal prosecutions, educational opportunities, jury selection, and employment practices. The United States Supreme Court has been ambivalent about the need for significance testing in such cases, and it has yet to consider carefully the use of formal inferential methods. Various techniques for conveying information to a court about the inferential value of sample statistics are illustrated in the context of two jury-selection discrimination cases. The role of statistical evidence in certain employment discrimination cases is also considered. It is suggested that the classical method of hypothesis testing used by the Supreme Court is not appropriate to testing whether a given defendant discriminated. Presentation of p values, prediction or confidence intervals, and likelihood functions are shown to be preferable. Bayesian methods are also considered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)773-783
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the American Statistical Association
Volume77
Issue number380
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1982

Fingerprint

Discrimination
Person
Sample statistic
Prediction Interval
Testing
Formal Methods
Bayesian Methods
p-Value
Hypothesis Testing
Likelihood Function
Confidence interval
Evidence
Juries
Supreme Court
Employment practices
Social policy
Prediction interval
Formal methods
Hypothesis testing
Education

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty

Cite this

Kaye, David. / Statistical evidence of discrimination. In: Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1982 ; Vol. 77, No. 380. pp. 773-783.
@article{23d3b5d913b44615a65ca0d8008929ca,
title = "Statistical evidence of discrimination",
abstract = "Generally speaking, laws against discrimination prohibit treating similarly situated persons differently. Legal analysis or social policy supplies the criteria for ascertaining which persons are similarly situated. Statistical evidence has been used in cases, among others, alleging discrimination in criminal prosecutions, educational opportunities, jury selection, and employment practices. The United States Supreme Court has been ambivalent about the need for significance testing in such cases, and it has yet to consider carefully the use of formal inferential methods. Various techniques for conveying information to a court about the inferential value of sample statistics are illustrated in the context of two jury-selection discrimination cases. The role of statistical evidence in certain employment discrimination cases is also considered. It is suggested that the classical method of hypothesis testing used by the Supreme Court is not appropriate to testing whether a given defendant discriminated. Presentation of p values, prediction or confidence intervals, and likelihood functions are shown to be preferable. Bayesian methods are also considered.",
author = "David Kaye",
year = "1982",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01621459.1982.10477885",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "773--783",
journal = "Journal of the American Statistical Association",
issn = "0162-1459",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "380",

}

Statistical evidence of discrimination. / Kaye, David.

In: Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 77, No. 380, 01.01.1982, p. 773-783.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Statistical evidence of discrimination

AU - Kaye, David

PY - 1982/1/1

Y1 - 1982/1/1

N2 - Generally speaking, laws against discrimination prohibit treating similarly situated persons differently. Legal analysis or social policy supplies the criteria for ascertaining which persons are similarly situated. Statistical evidence has been used in cases, among others, alleging discrimination in criminal prosecutions, educational opportunities, jury selection, and employment practices. The United States Supreme Court has been ambivalent about the need for significance testing in such cases, and it has yet to consider carefully the use of formal inferential methods. Various techniques for conveying information to a court about the inferential value of sample statistics are illustrated in the context of two jury-selection discrimination cases. The role of statistical evidence in certain employment discrimination cases is also considered. It is suggested that the classical method of hypothesis testing used by the Supreme Court is not appropriate to testing whether a given defendant discriminated. Presentation of p values, prediction or confidence intervals, and likelihood functions are shown to be preferable. Bayesian methods are also considered.

AB - Generally speaking, laws against discrimination prohibit treating similarly situated persons differently. Legal analysis or social policy supplies the criteria for ascertaining which persons are similarly situated. Statistical evidence has been used in cases, among others, alleging discrimination in criminal prosecutions, educational opportunities, jury selection, and employment practices. The United States Supreme Court has been ambivalent about the need for significance testing in such cases, and it has yet to consider carefully the use of formal inferential methods. Various techniques for conveying information to a court about the inferential value of sample statistics are illustrated in the context of two jury-selection discrimination cases. The role of statistical evidence in certain employment discrimination cases is also considered. It is suggested that the classical method of hypothesis testing used by the Supreme Court is not appropriate to testing whether a given defendant discriminated. Presentation of p values, prediction or confidence intervals, and likelihood functions are shown to be preferable. Bayesian methods are also considered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889394908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84889394908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01621459.1982.10477885

DO - 10.1080/01621459.1982.10477885

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84889394908

VL - 77

SP - 773

EP - 783

JO - Journal of the American Statistical Association

JF - Journal of the American Statistical Association

SN - 0162-1459

IS - 380

ER -