Status competition, inequality, and fertility

Implications for the demographic transition

Mary Shenk, Hillard S. Kaplan, Paul L. Hooper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The role that social status plays in small-scale societies suggests that status may be important for understanding the evolution of human fertility decisions, and for understanding howsuch decisions play out in modern contexts. This paper explores whether modelling competition for status—in the sense of relative rank within a society—can help shed light on fertility decline and the demographic transition. We develop a model of how levels of inequality and status competition affect optimal investment by parents in the embodied capital (health, strength, and skills) and social status of offspring, focusing on feedbacks between individual decisions and socio-ecological conditions. We find that conditions similar to those in demographic transition societies yield increased investment in both embodied capital and social status, generating substantial decreases in fertility, particularly under conditions of high inequality and intense status competition. We suggest that a complete explanation for both fertility variation in small-scale societies and modern fertility decline will take into account the effects of status competition and inequality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number20150150
JournalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume371
Issue number1692
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 19 2016

Fingerprint

Population Dynamics
Fertility
demographic statistics
human fertility
Health
Feedback
Parents
Economics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

@article{cf57d6b469734741992963a6d1688593,
title = "Status competition, inequality, and fertility: Implications for the demographic transition",
abstract = "The role that social status plays in small-scale societies suggests that status may be important for understanding the evolution of human fertility decisions, and for understanding howsuch decisions play out in modern contexts. This paper explores whether modelling competition for status—in the sense of relative rank within a society—can help shed light on fertility decline and the demographic transition. We develop a model of how levels of inequality and status competition affect optimal investment by parents in the embodied capital (health, strength, and skills) and social status of offspring, focusing on feedbacks between individual decisions and socio-ecological conditions. We find that conditions similar to those in demographic transition societies yield increased investment in both embodied capital and social status, generating substantial decreases in fertility, particularly under conditions of high inequality and intense status competition. We suggest that a complete explanation for both fertility variation in small-scale societies and modern fertility decline will take into account the effects of status competition and inequality.",
author = "Mary Shenk and Kaplan, {Hillard S.} and Hooper, {Paul L.}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1098/rstb.2015.0150",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "371",
journal = "Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences",
issn = "0962-8436",
publisher = "Royal Society of London",
number = "1692",

}

Status competition, inequality, and fertility : Implications for the demographic transition. / Shenk, Mary; Kaplan, Hillard S.; Hooper, Paul L.

In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 371, No. 1692, 20150150, 19.04.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Status competition, inequality, and fertility

T2 - Implications for the demographic transition

AU - Shenk, Mary

AU - Kaplan, Hillard S.

AU - Hooper, Paul L.

PY - 2016/4/19

Y1 - 2016/4/19

N2 - The role that social status plays in small-scale societies suggests that status may be important for understanding the evolution of human fertility decisions, and for understanding howsuch decisions play out in modern contexts. This paper explores whether modelling competition for status—in the sense of relative rank within a society—can help shed light on fertility decline and the demographic transition. We develop a model of how levels of inequality and status competition affect optimal investment by parents in the embodied capital (health, strength, and skills) and social status of offspring, focusing on feedbacks between individual decisions and socio-ecological conditions. We find that conditions similar to those in demographic transition societies yield increased investment in both embodied capital and social status, generating substantial decreases in fertility, particularly under conditions of high inequality and intense status competition. We suggest that a complete explanation for both fertility variation in small-scale societies and modern fertility decline will take into account the effects of status competition and inequality.

AB - The role that social status plays in small-scale societies suggests that status may be important for understanding the evolution of human fertility decisions, and for understanding howsuch decisions play out in modern contexts. This paper explores whether modelling competition for status—in the sense of relative rank within a society—can help shed light on fertility decline and the demographic transition. We develop a model of how levels of inequality and status competition affect optimal investment by parents in the embodied capital (health, strength, and skills) and social status of offspring, focusing on feedbacks between individual decisions and socio-ecological conditions. We find that conditions similar to those in demographic transition societies yield increased investment in both embodied capital and social status, generating substantial decreases in fertility, particularly under conditions of high inequality and intense status competition. We suggest that a complete explanation for both fertility variation in small-scale societies and modern fertility decline will take into account the effects of status competition and inequality.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961909494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961909494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1098/rstb.2015.0150

DO - 10.1098/rstb.2015.0150

M3 - Article

VL - 371

JO - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

JF - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

SN - 0962-8436

IS - 1692

M1 - 20150150

ER -