Strategies and dispositional correlates of sexual coercion perpetrated by women: An exploratory investigation

Brenda L. Russell, Debra L. Oswald

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

53 Scopus citations

Abstract

This research tests whether theoretical constructs typically associated with male perpetrators of sexual coercion are predictive of women who perpetrate sexual coercion. We administered a questionnaire that contained measures of sexual experience, social dominance, ambivalent sexism, sex roles, attitudes toward sexual harassment, and lovestyle approaches toward intimate relationships to a sample of women undergraduates. Results found 18% of women to report engaging in sexually coercive behaviors. Coercive women exhibited higher tolerance of sexual harassment, and were significantly higher in femininity than noncoercive women. Coercive women were also found to embrace a ludic (manipulative, game-playing approach toward love) lovestyle significantly more than noncoercive women, while pragma (a logical approach toward love) was negatively associated with coercion. Lastly, a significant difference was found between coercive and noncoercive women and self-reported victimization. Eighty-one percent of women who reported using coercive strategies in their relationships also reported having been sexually victimized.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)103-115
Number of pages13
JournalSex Roles
Volume45
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2001

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Gender Studies
  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Strategies and dispositional correlates of sexual coercion perpetrated by women: An exploratory investigation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this