TY - JOUR
T1 - Stratigraphic model predictions of geoacoustic properties
AU - Kraft, Barbara J.
AU - Overeem, Irina
AU - Holland, Charles W.
AU - Pratson, Lincoln F.
AU - Syvitski, James P.M.
AU - Mayer, Larry A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received September 22, 2004; revised November 17, 2005; accepted January 5, 2006. This work was supported in part by the U.S. Office of Naval Research under Code 321OA. Guest Editor: J. A. Goff. B. J. Kraft and L. A. Mayer are with the Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824 USA (e-mail: bjkraft@ccom.unh.edu; larry.mayer@unh.edu). I. Overeem and J. P. M. Syvitski are with the Environmental Computation and Imaging Facility, INSTAAR, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 USA (e-mail: irina.overeem@colorado.edu; syvitski@colorado.edu). C. W. Holland is with the Applied Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16804 USA (e-mail: cwh10@psu.edu). L. F. Pratson is with the Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708 USA (e-mail: lp14@duke.edu). Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/JOE.2006.875235
PY - 2006/4
Y1 - 2006/4
N2 - Geoacoustic properties of the seabed have a controlling role in the propagation and reverberation of sound in shallow-water environments. Several techniques are available to quantify the important properties but are usually unable to adequately sample the region of interest. In this paper, we explore the potential for obtaining geotechnical properties from a process-based stratigraphic model. Grain-size predictions from the stratigraphic model are combined with two acoustic models to estimate sound speed with distance across the New Jersey continental shelf and with depth below the seabed. Model predictions are compared to two independent sets of data: 1) Surficial sound speeds obtained through direct measurement using in situ compressional wave probes, and 2) sound speed as a function of depth obtained through inversion of seabed reflection measurements. In water depths less than 100 m, the model predictions produce a trend of decreasing grain-size and sound speed with increasing water depth as similarly observed in the measured surficial data. In water depths between 100 and 130 m, the model predictions exhibit an increase in sound speed that was not observed in the measured surficial data. A closer comparison indicates that the grain-sizes predicted for the surficial sediments are generally too small producing sound speeds that are too slow. The predicted sound speeds also tend to be too slow for sediments 0.5-20 m below the seabed in water depths greater than 100 m. However, in water depths less than 100 m, the sound speeds between 0.5-20-m subbottom depth are generally too fast. There are several reasons for the discrepancies including the stratigraphic model was limited to two dimensions, the model was unable to simulate biologic processes responsible for the high sound-speed shell material common in the model area, and incomplete geological records necessary to accurately predict grain-size.
AB - Geoacoustic properties of the seabed have a controlling role in the propagation and reverberation of sound in shallow-water environments. Several techniques are available to quantify the important properties but are usually unable to adequately sample the region of interest. In this paper, we explore the potential for obtaining geotechnical properties from a process-based stratigraphic model. Grain-size predictions from the stratigraphic model are combined with two acoustic models to estimate sound speed with distance across the New Jersey continental shelf and with depth below the seabed. Model predictions are compared to two independent sets of data: 1) Surficial sound speeds obtained through direct measurement using in situ compressional wave probes, and 2) sound speed as a function of depth obtained through inversion of seabed reflection measurements. In water depths less than 100 m, the model predictions produce a trend of decreasing grain-size and sound speed with increasing water depth as similarly observed in the measured surficial data. In water depths between 100 and 130 m, the model predictions exhibit an increase in sound speed that was not observed in the measured surficial data. A closer comparison indicates that the grain-sizes predicted for the surficial sediments are generally too small producing sound speeds that are too slow. The predicted sound speeds also tend to be too slow for sediments 0.5-20 m below the seabed in water depths greater than 100 m. However, in water depths less than 100 m, the sound speeds between 0.5-20-m subbottom depth are generally too fast. There are several reasons for the discrepancies including the stratigraphic model was limited to two dimensions, the model was unable to simulate biologic processes responsible for the high sound-speed shell material common in the model area, and incomplete geological records necessary to accurately predict grain-size.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750111461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750111461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/JOE.2006.875235
DO - 10.1109/JOE.2006.875235
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33750111461
SN - 0364-9059
VL - 31
SP - 266
EP - 283
JO - IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering
JF - IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering
IS - 2
ER -