Stress and working memory

Between-person and within-person relationships

Martin John Sliwinski, Joshua Morrison Smyth, Robert S. Stawski, Christina Wasylyshyn

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The individual differences construct of working memory capacity (WMC) is a topic of increasing interest in cognitive psychology. The primary reason for this interest stems from research that demonstrates consistently strong relationships between measures of WMC and higher order cognitive function, such as fluid intelligence (Engle, Tuholski, Laughlin, & Conway, 1999). In addition to being an important predictor of psychometric measures of intellectual ability, WMC predicts performance on standardized achievement tests and grade point average (Cantor, Engle, & Hamilton, 1991; Engle et al., 1999). According to Engle et al. (1999) and Engle (2002), WMC reflects the ability to maintain relevant information in the focus of attention in the face of irrelevant and distracting stimuli. Engle and colleagues (Engle et al., 1999; Unsworth, Heitz, & Engle, this volume) argued that WMC is a central component of fluid intelligence and, hence, is a cognitive primitive. Although WMC is often viewed as a stable trait, some theorists have argued that changes in arousal, motivation, and the experience of stress can produce fluctuations in attentional reserve (Eysenck & Calvo, 1992; Kahneman, 1973; Hasher & Zacks, 1988). Consistent with this view, recent research suggests that the experience of even mild life-event stress might impair working memory performance (Klein & Boals, 2001a) and that interventions that ameliorate the effects of stress can improve working memory (Klein & Boals, 2001b). One theoretical account of this relationship proposes that the experience of stress leads to the subsequent experience of intrusive or worrisome thoughts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCognitive Limitations in Aging and Psychopathology
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages73-94
Number of pages22
ISBN (Electronic)9780511720413
ISBN (Print)9780521834070
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Aptitude
Intelligence
Arousal
Psychological Stress
Research
Psychometrics
Individuality
Cognition
Motivation
Psychology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Sliwinski, M. J., Smyth, J. M., Stawski, R. S., & Wasylyshyn, C. (2005). Stress and working memory: Between-person and within-person relationships. In Cognitive Limitations in Aging and Psychopathology (pp. 73-94). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720413.005
Sliwinski, Martin John ; Smyth, Joshua Morrison ; Stawski, Robert S. ; Wasylyshyn, Christina. / Stress and working memory : Between-person and within-person relationships. Cognitive Limitations in Aging and Psychopathology. Cambridge University Press, 2005. pp. 73-94
@inbook{41416345151f425c94d48cd81ce38d36,
title = "Stress and working memory: Between-person and within-person relationships",
abstract = "The individual differences construct of working memory capacity (WMC) is a topic of increasing interest in cognitive psychology. The primary reason for this interest stems from research that demonstrates consistently strong relationships between measures of WMC and higher order cognitive function, such as fluid intelligence (Engle, Tuholski, Laughlin, & Conway, 1999). In addition to being an important predictor of psychometric measures of intellectual ability, WMC predicts performance on standardized achievement tests and grade point average (Cantor, Engle, & Hamilton, 1991; Engle et al., 1999). According to Engle et al. (1999) and Engle (2002), WMC reflects the ability to maintain relevant information in the focus of attention in the face of irrelevant and distracting stimuli. Engle and colleagues (Engle et al., 1999; Unsworth, Heitz, & Engle, this volume) argued that WMC is a central component of fluid intelligence and, hence, is a cognitive primitive. Although WMC is often viewed as a stable trait, some theorists have argued that changes in arousal, motivation, and the experience of stress can produce fluctuations in attentional reserve (Eysenck & Calvo, 1992; Kahneman, 1973; Hasher & Zacks, 1988). Consistent with this view, recent research suggests that the experience of even mild life-event stress might impair working memory performance (Klein & Boals, 2001a) and that interventions that ameliorate the effects of stress can improve working memory (Klein & Boals, 2001b). One theoretical account of this relationship proposes that the experience of stress leads to the subsequent experience of intrusive or worrisome thoughts.",
author = "Sliwinski, {Martin John} and Smyth, {Joshua Morrison} and Stawski, {Robert S.} and Christina Wasylyshyn",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511720413.005",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780521834070",
pages = "73--94",
booktitle = "Cognitive Limitations in Aging and Psychopathology",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Sliwinski, MJ, Smyth, JM, Stawski, RS & Wasylyshyn, C 2005, Stress and working memory: Between-person and within-person relationships. in Cognitive Limitations in Aging and Psychopathology. Cambridge University Press, pp. 73-94. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720413.005

Stress and working memory : Between-person and within-person relationships. / Sliwinski, Martin John; Smyth, Joshua Morrison; Stawski, Robert S.; Wasylyshyn, Christina.

Cognitive Limitations in Aging and Psychopathology. Cambridge University Press, 2005. p. 73-94.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Stress and working memory

T2 - Between-person and within-person relationships

AU - Sliwinski, Martin John

AU - Smyth, Joshua Morrison

AU - Stawski, Robert S.

AU - Wasylyshyn, Christina

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - The individual differences construct of working memory capacity (WMC) is a topic of increasing interest in cognitive psychology. The primary reason for this interest stems from research that demonstrates consistently strong relationships between measures of WMC and higher order cognitive function, such as fluid intelligence (Engle, Tuholski, Laughlin, & Conway, 1999). In addition to being an important predictor of psychometric measures of intellectual ability, WMC predicts performance on standardized achievement tests and grade point average (Cantor, Engle, & Hamilton, 1991; Engle et al., 1999). According to Engle et al. (1999) and Engle (2002), WMC reflects the ability to maintain relevant information in the focus of attention in the face of irrelevant and distracting stimuli. Engle and colleagues (Engle et al., 1999; Unsworth, Heitz, & Engle, this volume) argued that WMC is a central component of fluid intelligence and, hence, is a cognitive primitive. Although WMC is often viewed as a stable trait, some theorists have argued that changes in arousal, motivation, and the experience of stress can produce fluctuations in attentional reserve (Eysenck & Calvo, 1992; Kahneman, 1973; Hasher & Zacks, 1988). Consistent with this view, recent research suggests that the experience of even mild life-event stress might impair working memory performance (Klein & Boals, 2001a) and that interventions that ameliorate the effects of stress can improve working memory (Klein & Boals, 2001b). One theoretical account of this relationship proposes that the experience of stress leads to the subsequent experience of intrusive or worrisome thoughts.

AB - The individual differences construct of working memory capacity (WMC) is a topic of increasing interest in cognitive psychology. The primary reason for this interest stems from research that demonstrates consistently strong relationships between measures of WMC and higher order cognitive function, such as fluid intelligence (Engle, Tuholski, Laughlin, & Conway, 1999). In addition to being an important predictor of psychometric measures of intellectual ability, WMC predicts performance on standardized achievement tests and grade point average (Cantor, Engle, & Hamilton, 1991; Engle et al., 1999). According to Engle et al. (1999) and Engle (2002), WMC reflects the ability to maintain relevant information in the focus of attention in the face of irrelevant and distracting stimuli. Engle and colleagues (Engle et al., 1999; Unsworth, Heitz, & Engle, this volume) argued that WMC is a central component of fluid intelligence and, hence, is a cognitive primitive. Although WMC is often viewed as a stable trait, some theorists have argued that changes in arousal, motivation, and the experience of stress can produce fluctuations in attentional reserve (Eysenck & Calvo, 1992; Kahneman, 1973; Hasher & Zacks, 1988). Consistent with this view, recent research suggests that the experience of even mild life-event stress might impair working memory performance (Klein & Boals, 2001a) and that interventions that ameliorate the effects of stress can improve working memory (Klein & Boals, 2001b). One theoretical account of this relationship proposes that the experience of stress leads to the subsequent experience of intrusive or worrisome thoughts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69749127708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69749127708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511720413.005

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511720413.005

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780521834070

SP - 73

EP - 94

BT - Cognitive Limitations in Aging and Psychopathology

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

Sliwinski MJ, Smyth JM, Stawski RS, Wasylyshyn C. Stress and working memory: Between-person and within-person relationships. In Cognitive Limitations in Aging and Psychopathology. Cambridge University Press. 2005. p. 73-94 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720413.005