Structure/function relationships of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors

Mark R. Brann, V. J. Klimkowski, John Ellis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The regions of muscarinic receptors that specify G-protein-coupling and ligand-binding have been defined in several recent studies. Overall, these studies have shown that amino acids within the third cytoplasmic loop of the receptors define their selectivity for different G-proteins, and that multiple, discontinuous epitopes contribute to their selectivities for different ligands. In fact, several competitive and allosteric antagonists can be classified into groups based on which of these epitopes contribute to their subtype selectivity. Site-directed mutagenesis, combined with covalent-labeling studies have suggested that ligands bind to a hydrophobic core of the receptors that is formed by multiple transmembrane (TM) domains. An aspartic acid located in TM3 is likely to bind to the ammonium headgroup of muscarinic ligands, and multiple hydroxyl-containing amino acids contribute to agonist but not antagonist binding. These data are discussed in the context of a computational model of a muscarinic receptor. Our model is based on a sequence alignment with bacteriorhodopsin, a seven TM protein for which a higher resolution structure is available. Most of the mutagenic data can be rationalized in the context of this model, and predict testable hypotheses concerning the mechanism by which ligands control the activity of muscarinic receptors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)405-412
Number of pages8
JournalLife Sciences
Volume52
Issue number5-6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Muscarinic Receptors
Ligands
GTP-Binding Proteins
Epitopes
Bacteriorhodopsins
Amino Acids
Mutagenesis
Sequence Alignment
Cytoplasmic and Nuclear Receptors
Site-Directed Mutagenesis
Ammonium Compounds
Aspartic Acid
Hydroxyl Radical
Labeling
Cholinergic Agents
Proteins

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)

Cite this

Brann, Mark R. ; Klimkowski, V. J. ; Ellis, John. / Structure/function relationships of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. In: Life Sciences. 1993 ; Vol. 52, No. 5-6. pp. 405-412.
@article{44d9de68f82e4bb3908a9679659dc90a,
title = "Structure/function relationships of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors",
abstract = "The regions of muscarinic receptors that specify G-protein-coupling and ligand-binding have been defined in several recent studies. Overall, these studies have shown that amino acids within the third cytoplasmic loop of the receptors define their selectivity for different G-proteins, and that multiple, discontinuous epitopes contribute to their selectivities for different ligands. In fact, several competitive and allosteric antagonists can be classified into groups based on which of these epitopes contribute to their subtype selectivity. Site-directed mutagenesis, combined with covalent-labeling studies have suggested that ligands bind to a hydrophobic core of the receptors that is formed by multiple transmembrane (TM) domains. An aspartic acid located in TM3 is likely to bind to the ammonium headgroup of muscarinic ligands, and multiple hydroxyl-containing amino acids contribute to agonist but not antagonist binding. These data are discussed in the context of a computational model of a muscarinic receptor. Our model is based on a sequence alignment with bacteriorhodopsin, a seven TM protein for which a higher resolution structure is available. Most of the mutagenic data can be rationalized in the context of this model, and predict testable hypotheses concerning the mechanism by which ligands control the activity of muscarinic receptors.",
author = "Brann, {Mark R.} and Klimkowski, {V. J.} and John Ellis",
year = "1993",
doi = "10.1016/0024-3205(93)90295-E",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "405--412",
journal = "Life Sciences",
issn = "0024-3205",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5-6",

}

Structure/function relationships of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. / Brann, Mark R.; Klimkowski, V. J.; Ellis, John.

In: Life Sciences, Vol. 52, No. 5-6, 1993, p. 405-412.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structure/function relationships of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors

AU - Brann, Mark R.

AU - Klimkowski, V. J.

AU - Ellis, John

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - The regions of muscarinic receptors that specify G-protein-coupling and ligand-binding have been defined in several recent studies. Overall, these studies have shown that amino acids within the third cytoplasmic loop of the receptors define their selectivity for different G-proteins, and that multiple, discontinuous epitopes contribute to their selectivities for different ligands. In fact, several competitive and allosteric antagonists can be classified into groups based on which of these epitopes contribute to their subtype selectivity. Site-directed mutagenesis, combined with covalent-labeling studies have suggested that ligands bind to a hydrophobic core of the receptors that is formed by multiple transmembrane (TM) domains. An aspartic acid located in TM3 is likely to bind to the ammonium headgroup of muscarinic ligands, and multiple hydroxyl-containing amino acids contribute to agonist but not antagonist binding. These data are discussed in the context of a computational model of a muscarinic receptor. Our model is based on a sequence alignment with bacteriorhodopsin, a seven TM protein for which a higher resolution structure is available. Most of the mutagenic data can be rationalized in the context of this model, and predict testable hypotheses concerning the mechanism by which ligands control the activity of muscarinic receptors.

AB - The regions of muscarinic receptors that specify G-protein-coupling and ligand-binding have been defined in several recent studies. Overall, these studies have shown that amino acids within the third cytoplasmic loop of the receptors define their selectivity for different G-proteins, and that multiple, discontinuous epitopes contribute to their selectivities for different ligands. In fact, several competitive and allosteric antagonists can be classified into groups based on which of these epitopes contribute to their subtype selectivity. Site-directed mutagenesis, combined with covalent-labeling studies have suggested that ligands bind to a hydrophobic core of the receptors that is formed by multiple transmembrane (TM) domains. An aspartic acid located in TM3 is likely to bind to the ammonium headgroup of muscarinic ligands, and multiple hydroxyl-containing amino acids contribute to agonist but not antagonist binding. These data are discussed in the context of a computational model of a muscarinic receptor. Our model is based on a sequence alignment with bacteriorhodopsin, a seven TM protein for which a higher resolution structure is available. Most of the mutagenic data can be rationalized in the context of this model, and predict testable hypotheses concerning the mechanism by which ligands control the activity of muscarinic receptors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027535598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027535598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0024-3205(93)90295-E

DO - 10.1016/0024-3205(93)90295-E

M3 - Article

C2 - 7680090

AN - SCOPUS:0027535598

VL - 52

SP - 405

EP - 412

JO - Life Sciences

JF - Life Sciences

SN - 0024-3205

IS - 5-6

ER -