Studying organizational advocacy and influence: Reexamining interest group research

Marie Hojnacki, David C. Kimball, Frank R. Baumgartner, Jeffrey M. Berry, Beth L. Leech

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science (1998), Frank Baumgartner and Beth Leech characterized a series of problems in the interest group research published between 1950 and 1995. In this article, we assess whether recent research has become more theoretically coherent, more attentive to context, and broader in both scope and topical focus, all of which are crucial to advancing the systematic study of interest groups and their policy-making activities. Overall, we observe more large-scale and longitudinal studies between 1996 and 2011 than Baumgartner & Leech observed between 1950 and 1995. This newer literature also is much more likely to focus on key issues for students of politics, and to give attention to the context in which organizations operate to affect public policy. However, we see minimal evidence that scholars addressing similar questions within the subfield are operating from one or a few shared theoretical frameworks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)379-399
Number of pages21
JournalAnnual Review of Political Science
Volume15
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 15 2012

Fingerprint

interest group
politics
political science
longitudinal study
public policy
evidence
Group
student
literature

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Hojnacki, Marie ; Kimball, David C. ; Baumgartner, Frank R. ; Berry, Jeffrey M. ; Leech, Beth L. / Studying organizational advocacy and influence : Reexamining interest group research. In: Annual Review of Political Science. 2012 ; Vol. 15. pp. 379-399.
@article{7c23e63f8b474f87a4a00976ae498f71,
title = "Studying organizational advocacy and influence: Reexamining interest group research",
abstract = "In Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science (1998), Frank Baumgartner and Beth Leech characterized a series of problems in the interest group research published between 1950 and 1995. In this article, we assess whether recent research has become more theoretically coherent, more attentive to context, and broader in both scope and topical focus, all of which are crucial to advancing the systematic study of interest groups and their policy-making activities. Overall, we observe more large-scale and longitudinal studies between 1996 and 2011 than Baumgartner & Leech observed between 1950 and 1995. This newer literature also is much more likely to focus on key issues for students of politics, and to give attention to the context in which organizations operate to affect public policy. However, we see minimal evidence that scholars addressing similar questions within the subfield are operating from one or a few shared theoretical frameworks.",
author = "Marie Hojnacki and Kimball, {David C.} and Baumgartner, {Frank R.} and Berry, {Jeffrey M.} and Leech, {Beth L.}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1146/annurev-polisci-070910-104051",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "379--399",
journal = "Annual Review of Political Science",
issn = "1094-2939",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

}

Studying organizational advocacy and influence : Reexamining interest group research. / Hojnacki, Marie; Kimball, David C.; Baumgartner, Frank R.; Berry, Jeffrey M.; Leech, Beth L.

In: Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 15, 15.06.2012, p. 379-399.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Studying organizational advocacy and influence

T2 - Reexamining interest group research

AU - Hojnacki, Marie

AU - Kimball, David C.

AU - Baumgartner, Frank R.

AU - Berry, Jeffrey M.

AU - Leech, Beth L.

PY - 2012/6/15

Y1 - 2012/6/15

N2 - In Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science (1998), Frank Baumgartner and Beth Leech characterized a series of problems in the interest group research published between 1950 and 1995. In this article, we assess whether recent research has become more theoretically coherent, more attentive to context, and broader in both scope and topical focus, all of which are crucial to advancing the systematic study of interest groups and their policy-making activities. Overall, we observe more large-scale and longitudinal studies between 1996 and 2011 than Baumgartner & Leech observed between 1950 and 1995. This newer literature also is much more likely to focus on key issues for students of politics, and to give attention to the context in which organizations operate to affect public policy. However, we see minimal evidence that scholars addressing similar questions within the subfield are operating from one or a few shared theoretical frameworks.

AB - In Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science (1998), Frank Baumgartner and Beth Leech characterized a series of problems in the interest group research published between 1950 and 1995. In this article, we assess whether recent research has become more theoretically coherent, more attentive to context, and broader in both scope and topical focus, all of which are crucial to advancing the systematic study of interest groups and their policy-making activities. Overall, we observe more large-scale and longitudinal studies between 1996 and 2011 than Baumgartner & Leech observed between 1950 and 1995. This newer literature also is much more likely to focus on key issues for students of politics, and to give attention to the context in which organizations operate to affect public policy. However, we see minimal evidence that scholars addressing similar questions within the subfield are operating from one or a few shared theoretical frameworks.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861434760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861434760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1146/annurev-polisci-070910-104051

DO - 10.1146/annurev-polisci-070910-104051

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84861434760

VL - 15

SP - 379

EP - 399

JO - Annual Review of Political Science

JF - Annual Review of Political Science

SN - 1094-2939

ER -