Styling One's Own in the Sri Lankan Tamil Diaspora

Implications for Language and Ethnicity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study focuses on the ways youth in the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora in Canada, Britain, and the United States construct their ethnic identity when proficiency in their heritage language is limited. Though these youth claim only rudimentary proficiency in Tamil and identify English as their dominant language, they are nonetheless able to claim ethnic identity through strategic language practices. Different from Rampton's theorization of crossing, such acts involve self-styling. While crossing is transgressive, self-styling is affirmative. While crossing is ludic, self-styling is invested. Furthermore, while crossing has been studied mostly in terms of the tokens produced, this study illustrates the way receptive proficiency and nonverbal participatory practices can help style one's own. The study illustrates certain new configurations of language and ethnicity in diaspora life.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)124-135
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Language, Identity and Education
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2012

Fingerprint

Tamil
diaspora
ethnicity
language
ethnic identity
Canada
Language
Diaspora
Ethnic Groups
Styling
Proficiency
Ethnic Identity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{768f68d9eab8474eac4f71b623a6cfc6,
title = "Styling One's Own in the Sri Lankan Tamil Diaspora: Implications for Language and Ethnicity",
abstract = "This study focuses on the ways youth in the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora in Canada, Britain, and the United States construct their ethnic identity when proficiency in their heritage language is limited. Though these youth claim only rudimentary proficiency in Tamil and identify English as their dominant language, they are nonetheless able to claim ethnic identity through strategic language practices. Different from Rampton's theorization of crossing, such acts involve self-styling. While crossing is transgressive, self-styling is affirmative. While crossing is ludic, self-styling is invested. Furthermore, while crossing has been studied mostly in terms of the tokens produced, this study illustrates the way receptive proficiency and nonverbal participatory practices can help style one's own. The study illustrates certain new configurations of language and ethnicity in diaspora life.",
author = "Athelstan Canagarajah",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15348458.2012.667309",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "124--135",
journal = "Journal of Language, Identity, and Education",
issn = "1534-8458",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Styling One's Own in the Sri Lankan Tamil Diaspora

T2 - Implications for Language and Ethnicity

AU - Canagarajah, Athelstan

PY - 2012/4/1

Y1 - 2012/4/1

N2 - This study focuses on the ways youth in the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora in Canada, Britain, and the United States construct their ethnic identity when proficiency in their heritage language is limited. Though these youth claim only rudimentary proficiency in Tamil and identify English as their dominant language, they are nonetheless able to claim ethnic identity through strategic language practices. Different from Rampton's theorization of crossing, such acts involve self-styling. While crossing is transgressive, self-styling is affirmative. While crossing is ludic, self-styling is invested. Furthermore, while crossing has been studied mostly in terms of the tokens produced, this study illustrates the way receptive proficiency and nonverbal participatory practices can help style one's own. The study illustrates certain new configurations of language and ethnicity in diaspora life.

AB - This study focuses on the ways youth in the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora in Canada, Britain, and the United States construct their ethnic identity when proficiency in their heritage language is limited. Though these youth claim only rudimentary proficiency in Tamil and identify English as their dominant language, they are nonetheless able to claim ethnic identity through strategic language practices. Different from Rampton's theorization of crossing, such acts involve self-styling. While crossing is transgressive, self-styling is affirmative. While crossing is ludic, self-styling is invested. Furthermore, while crossing has been studied mostly in terms of the tokens produced, this study illustrates the way receptive proficiency and nonverbal participatory practices can help style one's own. The study illustrates certain new configurations of language and ethnicity in diaspora life.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861603493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861603493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15348458.2012.667309

DO - 10.1080/15348458.2012.667309

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 124

EP - 135

JO - Journal of Language, Identity, and Education

JF - Journal of Language, Identity, and Education

SN - 1534-8458

IS - 2

ER -