Sublayer of Prandtl Boundary Layers

Emmanuel Grenier, Toan T. Nguyen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate the stability of Prandtl boundary layers in the vanishing viscosity limit ν→ 0. In Grenier (Commun Pure Appl Math 53(9):1067–1091, 2000), one of the authors proved that there exists no asymptotic expansion involving one of Prandtl’s boundary layer, with thickness of order ν, which describes the inviscid limit of Navier–Stokes equations. The instability gives rise to a viscous boundary sublayer whose thickness is of order ν3 / 4. In this paper, we point out how the stability of the classical Prandtl’s layer is linked to the stability of this sublayer. In particular, we prove that the two layers cannot both be nonlinearly stable in L. That is, either the Prandtl’s layer or the boundary sublayer is nonlinearly unstable in the sup norm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1139-1151
Number of pages13
JournalArchive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis
Volume229
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Boundary Layer
Boundary layers
Inviscid Limit
Vanishing Viscosity
Asymptotic Expansion
Navier-Stokes Equations
Unstable
Norm
Viscosity

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Analysis
  • Mathematics (miscellaneous)
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Grenier, Emmanuel ; Nguyen, Toan T. / Sublayer of Prandtl Boundary Layers. In: Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis. 2018 ; Vol. 229, No. 3. pp. 1139-1151.
@article{bc14a22ae1424965938d69c0bc81e741,
title = "Sublayer of Prandtl Boundary Layers",
abstract = "The aim of this paper is to investigate the stability of Prandtl boundary layers in the vanishing viscosity limit ν→ 0. In Grenier (Commun Pure Appl Math 53(9):1067–1091, 2000), one of the authors proved that there exists no asymptotic expansion involving one of Prandtl’s boundary layer, with thickness of order ν, which describes the inviscid limit of Navier–Stokes equations. The instability gives rise to a viscous boundary sublayer whose thickness is of order ν3 / 4. In this paper, we point out how the stability of the classical Prandtl’s layer is linked to the stability of this sublayer. In particular, we prove that the two layers cannot both be nonlinearly stable in L∞. That is, either the Prandtl’s layer or the boundary sublayer is nonlinearly unstable in the sup norm.",
author = "Emmanuel Grenier and Nguyen, {Toan T.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00205-018-1235-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "229",
pages = "1139--1151",
journal = "Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis",
issn = "0003-9527",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

Sublayer of Prandtl Boundary Layers. / Grenier, Emmanuel; Nguyen, Toan T.

In: Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, Vol. 229, No. 3, 01.09.2018, p. 1139-1151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sublayer of Prandtl Boundary Layers

AU - Grenier, Emmanuel

AU - Nguyen, Toan T.

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - The aim of this paper is to investigate the stability of Prandtl boundary layers in the vanishing viscosity limit ν→ 0. In Grenier (Commun Pure Appl Math 53(9):1067–1091, 2000), one of the authors proved that there exists no asymptotic expansion involving one of Prandtl’s boundary layer, with thickness of order ν, which describes the inviscid limit of Navier–Stokes equations. The instability gives rise to a viscous boundary sublayer whose thickness is of order ν3 / 4. In this paper, we point out how the stability of the classical Prandtl’s layer is linked to the stability of this sublayer. In particular, we prove that the two layers cannot both be nonlinearly stable in L∞. That is, either the Prandtl’s layer or the boundary sublayer is nonlinearly unstable in the sup norm.

AB - The aim of this paper is to investigate the stability of Prandtl boundary layers in the vanishing viscosity limit ν→ 0. In Grenier (Commun Pure Appl Math 53(9):1067–1091, 2000), one of the authors proved that there exists no asymptotic expansion involving one of Prandtl’s boundary layer, with thickness of order ν, which describes the inviscid limit of Navier–Stokes equations. The instability gives rise to a viscous boundary sublayer whose thickness is of order ν3 / 4. In this paper, we point out how the stability of the classical Prandtl’s layer is linked to the stability of this sublayer. In particular, we prove that the two layers cannot both be nonlinearly stable in L∞. That is, either the Prandtl’s layer or the boundary sublayer is nonlinearly unstable in the sup norm.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044966740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044966740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00205-018-1235-3

DO - 10.1007/s00205-018-1235-3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85044966740

VL - 229

SP - 1139

EP - 1151

JO - Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis

JF - Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis

SN - 0003-9527

IS - 3

ER -