SU‐GG‐T‐384: Overcoming Challenges in the Implementation of Oncology Information System

C. Saw, Michele Ferenci, C. Kruse, M. Singer, Henry Wagner Jr.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Full implementation of electronic oncology information system (OIS) requires strategic planning and complete staff participation. The major hurdles are the reluctance of staff to make the change, their fear of losing information, increased workload due to data entry, and perceived loss of control. At our institution, we undertook familiarity‐based strategy to overcome these challenges in the implementation of OIS to streamline the practice and eliminate paper work. Method and Materials: Prior to full implementation of the OIS, a steering committee consisting of information technology personal, medical physicist, radiation oncologist, and administrator was formed to assess the adequacy of our present system utilization. Next, the group engaged the vendor to learn about the clinical processes of radiotherapy and the functionality of the software. The functionality was mapped into the clinical processes and divided into tasks separating them in accordance to the disciplines. The steering committee was then expanded to include nurse, therapist, and office staff. A timeline was established with milestones towards completing the implementation. The strategy of implementation was initiated with tasks in the discipline our staff was most familiar with in the OIS rather than the logistics of the clinical processes. Training was then provided to educate the new functionality. In order to showcase the benefits of a more robust implementation, communication tasks such as scheduling, resources handling were implemented. As the staff began to see the results, resistance to the new implementation decreased. The implementation was then expanded beyond the familiar base and monitored weekly by the steering committee. Results: Familiarity‐based strategy in implementing the OIS is successful. Personnel were interested in learning and teaching newly acquired tools and functionality. Conclusion: Familiarity‐based implementation of an OIS is a superior strategy compared to clinical processes‐based implementation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Information Systems
Workload
Administrative Personnel
Fear
Teaching
Radiotherapy
Software
Nurses
Communication
Learning
Technology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{28458add05af4ede966e3601a8a10f67,
title = "SU‐GG‐T‐384: Overcoming Challenges in the Implementation of Oncology Information System",
abstract = "Purpose: Full implementation of electronic oncology information system (OIS) requires strategic planning and complete staff participation. The major hurdles are the reluctance of staff to make the change, their fear of losing information, increased workload due to data entry, and perceived loss of control. At our institution, we undertook familiarity‐based strategy to overcome these challenges in the implementation of OIS to streamline the practice and eliminate paper work. Method and Materials: Prior to full implementation of the OIS, a steering committee consisting of information technology personal, medical physicist, radiation oncologist, and administrator was formed to assess the adequacy of our present system utilization. Next, the group engaged the vendor to learn about the clinical processes of radiotherapy and the functionality of the software. The functionality was mapped into the clinical processes and divided into tasks separating them in accordance to the disciplines. The steering committee was then expanded to include nurse, therapist, and office staff. A timeline was established with milestones towards completing the implementation. The strategy of implementation was initiated with tasks in the discipline our staff was most familiar with in the OIS rather than the logistics of the clinical processes. Training was then provided to educate the new functionality. In order to showcase the benefits of a more robust implementation, communication tasks such as scheduling, resources handling were implemented. As the staff began to see the results, resistance to the new implementation decreased. The implementation was then expanded beyond the familiar base and monitored weekly by the steering committee. Results: Familiarity‐based strategy in implementing the OIS is successful. Personnel were interested in learning and teaching newly acquired tools and functionality. Conclusion: Familiarity‐based implementation of an OIS is a superior strategy compared to clinical processes‐based implementation.",
author = "C. Saw and Michele Ferenci and C. Kruse and M. Singer and {Wagner Jr.}, Henry",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.2962136",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

SU‐GG‐T‐384 : Overcoming Challenges in the Implementation of Oncology Information System. / Saw, C.; Ferenci, Michele; Kruse, C.; Singer, M.; Wagner Jr., Henry.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 35, No. 6, 01.01.2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐GG‐T‐384

T2 - Overcoming Challenges in the Implementation of Oncology Information System

AU - Saw, C.

AU - Ferenci, Michele

AU - Kruse, C.

AU - Singer, M.

AU - Wagner Jr., Henry

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Purpose: Full implementation of electronic oncology information system (OIS) requires strategic planning and complete staff participation. The major hurdles are the reluctance of staff to make the change, their fear of losing information, increased workload due to data entry, and perceived loss of control. At our institution, we undertook familiarity‐based strategy to overcome these challenges in the implementation of OIS to streamline the practice and eliminate paper work. Method and Materials: Prior to full implementation of the OIS, a steering committee consisting of information technology personal, medical physicist, radiation oncologist, and administrator was formed to assess the adequacy of our present system utilization. Next, the group engaged the vendor to learn about the clinical processes of radiotherapy and the functionality of the software. The functionality was mapped into the clinical processes and divided into tasks separating them in accordance to the disciplines. The steering committee was then expanded to include nurse, therapist, and office staff. A timeline was established with milestones towards completing the implementation. The strategy of implementation was initiated with tasks in the discipline our staff was most familiar with in the OIS rather than the logistics of the clinical processes. Training was then provided to educate the new functionality. In order to showcase the benefits of a more robust implementation, communication tasks such as scheduling, resources handling were implemented. As the staff began to see the results, resistance to the new implementation decreased. The implementation was then expanded beyond the familiar base and monitored weekly by the steering committee. Results: Familiarity‐based strategy in implementing the OIS is successful. Personnel were interested in learning and teaching newly acquired tools and functionality. Conclusion: Familiarity‐based implementation of an OIS is a superior strategy compared to clinical processes‐based implementation.

AB - Purpose: Full implementation of electronic oncology information system (OIS) requires strategic planning and complete staff participation. The major hurdles are the reluctance of staff to make the change, their fear of losing information, increased workload due to data entry, and perceived loss of control. At our institution, we undertook familiarity‐based strategy to overcome these challenges in the implementation of OIS to streamline the practice and eliminate paper work. Method and Materials: Prior to full implementation of the OIS, a steering committee consisting of information technology personal, medical physicist, radiation oncologist, and administrator was formed to assess the adequacy of our present system utilization. Next, the group engaged the vendor to learn about the clinical processes of radiotherapy and the functionality of the software. The functionality was mapped into the clinical processes and divided into tasks separating them in accordance to the disciplines. The steering committee was then expanded to include nurse, therapist, and office staff. A timeline was established with milestones towards completing the implementation. The strategy of implementation was initiated with tasks in the discipline our staff was most familiar with in the OIS rather than the logistics of the clinical processes. Training was then provided to educate the new functionality. In order to showcase the benefits of a more robust implementation, communication tasks such as scheduling, resources handling were implemented. As the staff began to see the results, resistance to the new implementation decreased. The implementation was then expanded beyond the familiar base and monitored weekly by the steering committee. Results: Familiarity‐based strategy in implementing the OIS is successful. Personnel were interested in learning and teaching newly acquired tools and functionality. Conclusion: Familiarity‐based implementation of an OIS is a superior strategy compared to clinical processes‐based implementation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024800721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024800721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.2962136

DO - 10.1118/1.2962136

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024800721

VL - 35

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -