Supervisor-Subordinate (Dis)agreement on Ethical Leadership: An Investigation of its Antecedents and Relationship to Organizational Deviance

Maribeth Kuenzi, Michael Brown, David M. Mayer, Manuela Priesemuth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We examine supervisor-subordinate (dis)agreement regarding perceptions of the supervisor's ethical leadership and its relationship to organizational deviance. We find that, on average, supervisors rate themselves more favorably on ethical leadership compared to how followers rate them. In addition, polynomial regression results reveal that unit-level organizational deviance is higher when there is agreement about lower levels of ethical leadership, and disagreement when supervisors rate themselves higher on ethical leadership than subordinates' ratings of the supervisors. Finally, drawing on social influence theories, we look at antecedents of (dis)agreement and find that supervisors' beliefs about themselves (that they were "better-than-average" ethical leaders) and others (their assumptions about whether the morality of their subordinates is malleable or not) are associated with self-other (dis)agreement on ethical leadership.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)25-53
Number of pages29
JournalBusiness Ethics Quarterly
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Deviance
Ethical leadership
Supervisors
Morality
Polynomial regression
Rating
Organizational level
Follower
Social influence
Social Influence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Philosophy
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

@article{01e1c02a462642f48d8df6e45619ac09,
title = "Supervisor-Subordinate (Dis)agreement on Ethical Leadership: An Investigation of its Antecedents and Relationship to Organizational Deviance",
abstract = "We examine supervisor-subordinate (dis)agreement regarding perceptions of the supervisor's ethical leadership and its relationship to organizational deviance. We find that, on average, supervisors rate themselves more favorably on ethical leadership compared to how followers rate them. In addition, polynomial regression results reveal that unit-level organizational deviance is higher when there is agreement about lower levels of ethical leadership, and disagreement when supervisors rate themselves higher on ethical leadership than subordinates' ratings of the supervisors. Finally, drawing on social influence theories, we look at antecedents of (dis)agreement and find that supervisors' beliefs about themselves (that they were {"}better-than-average{"} ethical leaders) and others (their assumptions about whether the morality of their subordinates is malleable or not) are associated with self-other (dis)agreement on ethical leadership.",
author = "Maribeth Kuenzi and Michael Brown and Mayer, {David M.} and Manuela Priesemuth",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/beq.2018.14",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "25--53",
journal = "Business Ethics Quarterly",
issn = "1052-150X",
publisher = "Philosophy Documentation Center",
number = "1",

}

Supervisor-Subordinate (Dis)agreement on Ethical Leadership : An Investigation of its Antecedents and Relationship to Organizational Deviance. / Kuenzi, Maribeth; Brown, Michael; Mayer, David M.; Priesemuth, Manuela.

In: Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 25-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Supervisor-Subordinate (Dis)agreement on Ethical Leadership

T2 - An Investigation of its Antecedents and Relationship to Organizational Deviance

AU - Kuenzi, Maribeth

AU - Brown, Michael

AU - Mayer, David M.

AU - Priesemuth, Manuela

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - We examine supervisor-subordinate (dis)agreement regarding perceptions of the supervisor's ethical leadership and its relationship to organizational deviance. We find that, on average, supervisors rate themselves more favorably on ethical leadership compared to how followers rate them. In addition, polynomial regression results reveal that unit-level organizational deviance is higher when there is agreement about lower levels of ethical leadership, and disagreement when supervisors rate themselves higher on ethical leadership than subordinates' ratings of the supervisors. Finally, drawing on social influence theories, we look at antecedents of (dis)agreement and find that supervisors' beliefs about themselves (that they were "better-than-average" ethical leaders) and others (their assumptions about whether the morality of their subordinates is malleable or not) are associated with self-other (dis)agreement on ethical leadership.

AB - We examine supervisor-subordinate (dis)agreement regarding perceptions of the supervisor's ethical leadership and its relationship to organizational deviance. We find that, on average, supervisors rate themselves more favorably on ethical leadership compared to how followers rate them. In addition, polynomial regression results reveal that unit-level organizational deviance is higher when there is agreement about lower levels of ethical leadership, and disagreement when supervisors rate themselves higher on ethical leadership than subordinates' ratings of the supervisors. Finally, drawing on social influence theories, we look at antecedents of (dis)agreement and find that supervisors' beliefs about themselves (that they were "better-than-average" ethical leaders) and others (their assumptions about whether the morality of their subordinates is malleable or not) are associated with self-other (dis)agreement on ethical leadership.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059850131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059850131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/beq.2018.14

DO - 10.1017/beq.2018.14

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85059850131

VL - 29

SP - 25

EP - 53

JO - Business Ethics Quarterly

JF - Business Ethics Quarterly

SN - 1052-150X

IS - 1

ER -