Supporting collaborative inquiry during a biology field trip with mobile peer-to-peer tools for learning: A case study with K-12 learners

Jari Laru, Sanna Järvelä, Roy Clariana

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study explores how collaborative inquiry learning can be supported with multiple scaffolding agents in a real-life field trip context. In practice, a mobile peer-to-peer messaging tool provided meta-cognitive and procedural support, while tutors and a nature guide provided more dynamic scaffolding in order to support argumentative discussions between groups of students during the co-creation of knowledge claims. The aim of the analysis was to identify and compare top- and low-performing dyads/triads in order to reveal the differences regarding their co-construction of arguments while creating knowledge claims. Although the results revealed several shortcomings in the types of argumentation, it could be established that differences between the top performers and low performers were statistically significant in terms of social modes of argumentation, the use of warrants in the mobile tool and in overall participation. In general, the use of the mobile tool likely promoted important interaction during inquiry learning, but led to superficial epistemological quality in the knowledge claim messages.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)103-117
Number of pages15
JournalInteractive Learning Environments
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2012

Fingerprint

biology
argumentation
knowledge
learning
dyad
tutor
group discussion
Students
participation
interaction
student

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

@article{e1f264ccaf634319b8b011dbf0f596ad,
title = "Supporting collaborative inquiry during a biology field trip with mobile peer-to-peer tools for learning: A case study with K-12 learners",
abstract = "This study explores how collaborative inquiry learning can be supported with multiple scaffolding agents in a real-life field trip context. In practice, a mobile peer-to-peer messaging tool provided meta-cognitive and procedural support, while tutors and a nature guide provided more dynamic scaffolding in order to support argumentative discussions between groups of students during the co-creation of knowledge claims. The aim of the analysis was to identify and compare top- and low-performing dyads/triads in order to reveal the differences regarding their co-construction of arguments while creating knowledge claims. Although the results revealed several shortcomings in the types of argumentation, it could be established that differences between the top performers and low performers were statistically significant in terms of social modes of argumentation, the use of warrants in the mobile tool and in overall participation. In general, the use of the mobile tool likely promoted important interaction during inquiry learning, but led to superficial epistemological quality in the knowledge claim messages.",
author = "Jari Laru and Sanna J{\"a}rvel{\"a} and Roy Clariana",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10494821003771350",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "103--117",
journal = "Interactive Learning Environments",
issn = "1049-4820",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Supporting collaborative inquiry during a biology field trip with mobile peer-to-peer tools for learning : A case study with K-12 learners. / Laru, Jari; Järvelä, Sanna; Clariana, Roy.

In: Interactive Learning Environments, Vol. 20, No. 2, 01.04.2012, p. 103-117.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Supporting collaborative inquiry during a biology field trip with mobile peer-to-peer tools for learning

T2 - A case study with K-12 learners

AU - Laru, Jari

AU - Järvelä, Sanna

AU - Clariana, Roy

PY - 2012/4/1

Y1 - 2012/4/1

N2 - This study explores how collaborative inquiry learning can be supported with multiple scaffolding agents in a real-life field trip context. In practice, a mobile peer-to-peer messaging tool provided meta-cognitive and procedural support, while tutors and a nature guide provided more dynamic scaffolding in order to support argumentative discussions between groups of students during the co-creation of knowledge claims. The aim of the analysis was to identify and compare top- and low-performing dyads/triads in order to reveal the differences regarding their co-construction of arguments while creating knowledge claims. Although the results revealed several shortcomings in the types of argumentation, it could be established that differences between the top performers and low performers were statistically significant in terms of social modes of argumentation, the use of warrants in the mobile tool and in overall participation. In general, the use of the mobile tool likely promoted important interaction during inquiry learning, but led to superficial epistemological quality in the knowledge claim messages.

AB - This study explores how collaborative inquiry learning can be supported with multiple scaffolding agents in a real-life field trip context. In practice, a mobile peer-to-peer messaging tool provided meta-cognitive and procedural support, while tutors and a nature guide provided more dynamic scaffolding in order to support argumentative discussions between groups of students during the co-creation of knowledge claims. The aim of the analysis was to identify and compare top- and low-performing dyads/triads in order to reveal the differences regarding their co-construction of arguments while creating knowledge claims. Although the results revealed several shortcomings in the types of argumentation, it could be established that differences between the top performers and low performers were statistically significant in terms of social modes of argumentation, the use of warrants in the mobile tool and in overall participation. In general, the use of the mobile tool likely promoted important interaction during inquiry learning, but led to superficial epistemological quality in the knowledge claim messages.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859481737&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859481737&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10494821003771350

DO - 10.1080/10494821003771350

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84859481737

VL - 20

SP - 103

EP - 117

JO - Interactive Learning Environments

JF - Interactive Learning Environments

SN - 1049-4820

IS - 2

ER -