Suppressing thoughts of evaluation while being evaluated

Michael L. Slepian, Masanori Oikawa, Joshua Morrison Smyth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Thought suppression can cause ironic increases in the occurrence of intrusive thoughts. Intrusive thoughts of evaluation could be especially disruptive while undergoing evaluation. Such a context, however, could help suppression efforts as the context provides an external source for which to attribute suppression failures. When suppressing thoughts of evaluation in a non-evaluative context (a context-content mismatch), typical ironic effects of thought suppression occurred. There was no increased accessibility of evaluation, however, when suppressing evaluation in an evaluative context (a context-content match), which allowed for attributing intrusive thoughts to the context, rather than the self, making suppression easier. Suppressing thoughts of evaluation may be beneficial in an evaluative context, suggesting that the consequences of willful suppression are moderated by context.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-39
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Slepian, Michael L. ; Oikawa, Masanori ; Smyth, Joshua Morrison. / Suppressing thoughts of evaluation while being evaluated. In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2014 ; Vol. 44, No. 1. pp. 31-39.
@article{b42a9aab253e46139786ae149ceea5dd,
title = "Suppressing thoughts of evaluation while being evaluated",
abstract = "Thought suppression can cause ironic increases in the occurrence of intrusive thoughts. Intrusive thoughts of evaluation could be especially disruptive while undergoing evaluation. Such a context, however, could help suppression efforts as the context provides an external source for which to attribute suppression failures. When suppressing thoughts of evaluation in a non-evaluative context (a context-content mismatch), typical ironic effects of thought suppression occurred. There was no increased accessibility of evaluation, however, when suppressing evaluation in an evaluative context (a context-content match), which allowed for attributing intrusive thoughts to the context, rather than the self, making suppression easier. Suppressing thoughts of evaluation may be beneficial in an evaluative context, suggesting that the consequences of willful suppression are moderated by context.",
author = "Slepian, {Michael L.} and Masanori Oikawa and Smyth, {Joshua Morrison}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jasp.12197",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "31--39",
journal = "Journal of Applied Social Psychology",
issn = "0021-9029",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Suppressing thoughts of evaluation while being evaluated. / Slepian, Michael L.; Oikawa, Masanori; Smyth, Joshua Morrison.

In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 44, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 31-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Suppressing thoughts of evaluation while being evaluated

AU - Slepian, Michael L.

AU - Oikawa, Masanori

AU - Smyth, Joshua Morrison

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Thought suppression can cause ironic increases in the occurrence of intrusive thoughts. Intrusive thoughts of evaluation could be especially disruptive while undergoing evaluation. Such a context, however, could help suppression efforts as the context provides an external source for which to attribute suppression failures. When suppressing thoughts of evaluation in a non-evaluative context (a context-content mismatch), typical ironic effects of thought suppression occurred. There was no increased accessibility of evaluation, however, when suppressing evaluation in an evaluative context (a context-content match), which allowed for attributing intrusive thoughts to the context, rather than the self, making suppression easier. Suppressing thoughts of evaluation may be beneficial in an evaluative context, suggesting that the consequences of willful suppression are moderated by context.

AB - Thought suppression can cause ironic increases in the occurrence of intrusive thoughts. Intrusive thoughts of evaluation could be especially disruptive while undergoing evaluation. Such a context, however, could help suppression efforts as the context provides an external source for which to attribute suppression failures. When suppressing thoughts of evaluation in a non-evaluative context (a context-content mismatch), typical ironic effects of thought suppression occurred. There was no increased accessibility of evaluation, however, when suppressing evaluation in an evaluative context (a context-content match), which allowed for attributing intrusive thoughts to the context, rather than the self, making suppression easier. Suppressing thoughts of evaluation may be beneficial in an evaluative context, suggesting that the consequences of willful suppression are moderated by context.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892475877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892475877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jasp.12197

DO - 10.1111/jasp.12197

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 31

EP - 39

JO - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

SN - 0021-9029

IS - 1

ER -