Surgical outcomes research: A progression from performance audits, to assessment of administrative databases, to prospective risk-adjusted analysis - How far have we come?

Elaine H. Morrato, Peter Dillon, Moritz Ziegler

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review focuses on how the assessment of surgical quality and safety has evolved from individual performance audits and morbidity and mortality reviews, to assessment of large administrative databases, to the current practice of prospective risk-adjusted analysis by a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for children's surgical care. This evolution follows the natural availability of surgical outcome data and a national call for improved hospital care safety and quality. RECENT FINDINGS: Two new advances in children's surgical care include the comparative use of national health record data compiled in administrative datasets and the use of a risk-adjusted assessment of children's surgical morbidity and mortality as assessed by a newly developed National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for children's operative care. The value and application of these two datasets are presented. SUMMARY: The evolution of the assessment of surgical quality and safety will equip the surgeon with an optimal array of outcome assessment tools to assure the best in surgical quality and safety for the pediatric patient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)320-325
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent opinion in pediatrics
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2008

Fingerprint

Child Care
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Quality Improvement
Safety
Morbidity
Mortality
Quality of Health Care
Patient Safety
Pediatrics
Health
Datasets

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

@article{019a0d7dc36a4ad790c2f6521c2eaab8,
title = "Surgical outcomes research: A progression from performance audits, to assessment of administrative databases, to prospective risk-adjusted analysis - How far have we come?",
abstract = "PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review focuses on how the assessment of surgical quality and safety has evolved from individual performance audits and morbidity and mortality reviews, to assessment of large administrative databases, to the current practice of prospective risk-adjusted analysis by a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for children's surgical care. This evolution follows the natural availability of surgical outcome data and a national call for improved hospital care safety and quality. RECENT FINDINGS: Two new advances in children's surgical care include the comparative use of national health record data compiled in administrative datasets and the use of a risk-adjusted assessment of children's surgical morbidity and mortality as assessed by a newly developed National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for children's operative care. The value and application of these two datasets are presented. SUMMARY: The evolution of the assessment of surgical quality and safety will equip the surgeon with an optimal array of outcome assessment tools to assure the best in surgical quality and safety for the pediatric patient.",
author = "Morrato, {Elaine H.} and Peter Dillon and Moritz Ziegler",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MOP.0b013e3283005857",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "320--325",
journal = "Current Opinion in Pediatrics",
issn = "1040-8703",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

Surgical outcomes research : A progression from performance audits, to assessment of administrative databases, to prospective risk-adjusted analysis - How far have we come? / Morrato, Elaine H.; Dillon, Peter; Ziegler, Moritz.

In: Current opinion in pediatrics, Vol. 20, No. 3, 01.06.2008, p. 320-325.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical outcomes research

T2 - A progression from performance audits, to assessment of administrative databases, to prospective risk-adjusted analysis - How far have we come?

AU - Morrato, Elaine H.

AU - Dillon, Peter

AU - Ziegler, Moritz

PY - 2008/6/1

Y1 - 2008/6/1

N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review focuses on how the assessment of surgical quality and safety has evolved from individual performance audits and morbidity and mortality reviews, to assessment of large administrative databases, to the current practice of prospective risk-adjusted analysis by a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for children's surgical care. This evolution follows the natural availability of surgical outcome data and a national call for improved hospital care safety and quality. RECENT FINDINGS: Two new advances in children's surgical care include the comparative use of national health record data compiled in administrative datasets and the use of a risk-adjusted assessment of children's surgical morbidity and mortality as assessed by a newly developed National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for children's operative care. The value and application of these two datasets are presented. SUMMARY: The evolution of the assessment of surgical quality and safety will equip the surgeon with an optimal array of outcome assessment tools to assure the best in surgical quality and safety for the pediatric patient.

AB - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review focuses on how the assessment of surgical quality and safety has evolved from individual performance audits and morbidity and mortality reviews, to assessment of large administrative databases, to the current practice of prospective risk-adjusted analysis by a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for children's surgical care. This evolution follows the natural availability of surgical outcome data and a national call for improved hospital care safety and quality. RECENT FINDINGS: Two new advances in children's surgical care include the comparative use of national health record data compiled in administrative datasets and the use of a risk-adjusted assessment of children's surgical morbidity and mortality as assessed by a newly developed National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for children's operative care. The value and application of these two datasets are presented. SUMMARY: The evolution of the assessment of surgical quality and safety will equip the surgeon with an optimal array of outcome assessment tools to assure the best in surgical quality and safety for the pediatric patient.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43449121255&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43449121255&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MOP.0b013e3283005857

DO - 10.1097/MOP.0b013e3283005857

M3 - Review article

C2 - 18475103

AN - SCOPUS:43449121255

VL - 20

SP - 320

EP - 325

JO - Current Opinion in Pediatrics

JF - Current Opinion in Pediatrics

SN - 1040-8703

IS - 3

ER -