Survey on the Implementation of National Equine Identification in the United States

K. S. Vanderman, Ann M. Swinker, B. E. Gill, Rama B. Radhakrishna, Daniel M. Kniffen, William Burton Staniar, H. B. McKernan, R. C. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The National Animal Identification System (NAIS) is a United States animal disease tracking program. It has been controversial among producers, particularly in the equine industry. This study evaluated the equine industry's familiarity with and concerns about NAIS, use of emergency preparations, and preferred animal identification methods. A list of 10,010 horse owners representing 14 major equine groups was generated, from which a random sample (n = 2,783) received surveys and follow-up mailings. Data were analyzed using SPSS 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) for descriptive statistics and Pearson correlations. Results indicated that 62.8% of respondents were not familiar with NAIS, and 51.9% were unsure if they were interested in participating. On a scale of 1 (no concern) to 5 (very concerned), the mean was 4.19 with regard to being notified about disease outbreaks in the respondents' area, 3.92 for recovering lost or stolen horses, and 3.75 for maintaining confidentiality of information. Over 55% of equine owners did not have a plan of action for their horses during a disaster, and 80% did not practice biosecurity. Although 81.4% were familiar with microchipping as a form of identification, only 2.4% used microchipping to identify their horses. Equine owners should be provided with information regarding NAIS, biosecurity, and disease prevention practices. The NAIS program should incorporate items such as notification of disease outbreaks and assistance in recovering lost or stolen horses, because these may be viewed as benefits of participation by the equine industry and may increase program acceptance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)819-822
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Equine Veterinary Science
Volume29
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2009

Fingerprint

Horses
Animal Identification Systems
animal identification
horses
injectable transponders
Industry
biosecurity
industry
Disease Outbreaks
Surveys and Questionnaires
Animal Diseases
Confidentiality
disease prevention
animal diseases
disasters
Disasters
Emergencies
statistics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Equine

Cite this

Vanderman, K. S. ; Swinker, Ann M. ; Gill, B. E. ; Radhakrishna, Rama B. ; Kniffen, Daniel M. ; Staniar, William Burton ; McKernan, H. B. ; Miller, R. C. / Survey on the Implementation of National Equine Identification in the United States. In: Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 2009 ; Vol. 29, No. 12. pp. 819-822.
@article{9243fba07d8c4207816505bd1f6354c3,
title = "Survey on the Implementation of National Equine Identification in the United States",
abstract = "The National Animal Identification System (NAIS) is a United States animal disease tracking program. It has been controversial among producers, particularly in the equine industry. This study evaluated the equine industry's familiarity with and concerns about NAIS, use of emergency preparations, and preferred animal identification methods. A list of 10,010 horse owners representing 14 major equine groups was generated, from which a random sample (n = 2,783) received surveys and follow-up mailings. Data were analyzed using SPSS 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) for descriptive statistics and Pearson correlations. Results indicated that 62.8{\%} of respondents were not familiar with NAIS, and 51.9{\%} were unsure if they were interested in participating. On a scale of 1 (no concern) to 5 (very concerned), the mean was 4.19 with regard to being notified about disease outbreaks in the respondents' area, 3.92 for recovering lost or stolen horses, and 3.75 for maintaining confidentiality of information. Over 55{\%} of equine owners did not have a plan of action for their horses during a disaster, and 80{\%} did not practice biosecurity. Although 81.4{\%} were familiar with microchipping as a form of identification, only 2.4{\%} used microchipping to identify their horses. Equine owners should be provided with information regarding NAIS, biosecurity, and disease prevention practices. The NAIS program should incorporate items such as notification of disease outbreaks and assistance in recovering lost or stolen horses, because these may be viewed as benefits of participation by the equine industry and may increase program acceptance.",
author = "Vanderman, {K. S.} and Swinker, {Ann M.} and Gill, {B. E.} and Radhakrishna, {Rama B.} and Kniffen, {Daniel M.} and Staniar, {William Burton} and McKernan, {H. B.} and Miller, {R. C.}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jevs.2009.10.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "819--822",
journal = "Journal of Equine Veterinary Science",
issn = "0737-0806",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "12",

}

Survey on the Implementation of National Equine Identification in the United States. / Vanderman, K. S.; Swinker, Ann M.; Gill, B. E.; Radhakrishna, Rama B.; Kniffen, Daniel M.; Staniar, William Burton; McKernan, H. B.; Miller, R. C.

In: Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, Vol. 29, No. 12, 01.12.2009, p. 819-822.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Survey on the Implementation of National Equine Identification in the United States

AU - Vanderman, K. S.

AU - Swinker, Ann M.

AU - Gill, B. E.

AU - Radhakrishna, Rama B.

AU - Kniffen, Daniel M.

AU - Staniar, William Burton

AU - McKernan, H. B.

AU - Miller, R. C.

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - The National Animal Identification System (NAIS) is a United States animal disease tracking program. It has been controversial among producers, particularly in the equine industry. This study evaluated the equine industry's familiarity with and concerns about NAIS, use of emergency preparations, and preferred animal identification methods. A list of 10,010 horse owners representing 14 major equine groups was generated, from which a random sample (n = 2,783) received surveys and follow-up mailings. Data were analyzed using SPSS 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) for descriptive statistics and Pearson correlations. Results indicated that 62.8% of respondents were not familiar with NAIS, and 51.9% were unsure if they were interested in participating. On a scale of 1 (no concern) to 5 (very concerned), the mean was 4.19 with regard to being notified about disease outbreaks in the respondents' area, 3.92 for recovering lost or stolen horses, and 3.75 for maintaining confidentiality of information. Over 55% of equine owners did not have a plan of action for their horses during a disaster, and 80% did not practice biosecurity. Although 81.4% were familiar with microchipping as a form of identification, only 2.4% used microchipping to identify their horses. Equine owners should be provided with information regarding NAIS, biosecurity, and disease prevention practices. The NAIS program should incorporate items such as notification of disease outbreaks and assistance in recovering lost or stolen horses, because these may be viewed as benefits of participation by the equine industry and may increase program acceptance.

AB - The National Animal Identification System (NAIS) is a United States animal disease tracking program. It has been controversial among producers, particularly in the equine industry. This study evaluated the equine industry's familiarity with and concerns about NAIS, use of emergency preparations, and preferred animal identification methods. A list of 10,010 horse owners representing 14 major equine groups was generated, from which a random sample (n = 2,783) received surveys and follow-up mailings. Data were analyzed using SPSS 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) for descriptive statistics and Pearson correlations. Results indicated that 62.8% of respondents were not familiar with NAIS, and 51.9% were unsure if they were interested in participating. On a scale of 1 (no concern) to 5 (very concerned), the mean was 4.19 with regard to being notified about disease outbreaks in the respondents' area, 3.92 for recovering lost or stolen horses, and 3.75 for maintaining confidentiality of information. Over 55% of equine owners did not have a plan of action for their horses during a disaster, and 80% did not practice biosecurity. Although 81.4% were familiar with microchipping as a form of identification, only 2.4% used microchipping to identify their horses. Equine owners should be provided with information regarding NAIS, biosecurity, and disease prevention practices. The NAIS program should incorporate items such as notification of disease outbreaks and assistance in recovering lost or stolen horses, because these may be viewed as benefits of participation by the equine industry and may increase program acceptance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71649095874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=71649095874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jevs.2009.10.014

DO - 10.1016/j.jevs.2009.10.014

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 819

EP - 822

JO - Journal of Equine Veterinary Science

JF - Journal of Equine Veterinary Science

SN - 0737-0806

IS - 12

ER -