Switch cost modulations in bilingual sentence processing: evidence from shadowing

Sybrine Bultena, Ton Dijkstra, Adriana Van Hell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In bilingual processing, cognates are associated with facilitatory processing, while switching between languages is associated with a processing cost. This study investigates whether co-activation of cognates affects the magnitude of switch costs in sentence context. A shadowing task was conducted to examine whether verb cognates reduce switch costs in sentences that switched between participants' L1 and L2. In addition, we considered whether these effects were influenced by L2 proficiency, switching direction and cross-linguistic overlap in syntactic structure. Bilinguals were presented with L1 and L2 sentences that contained a language switch preceded by a cognate. Shadowing latencies showed that switching to L2 was more costly than switching to L1. Switch costs in both directions were not modulated by the presence of a verb cognate, and this effect was not affected by syntactic structure or L2 proficiency. The results are informative for the field of bilingual processing and the lexical trigger hypothesis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)586-605
Number of pages20
JournalLanguage, Cognition and Neuroscience
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 28 2015

Fingerprint

Costs and Cost Analysis
costs
evidence
Language
Linguistics
language
activation
linguistics
Sentence Processing
Costs
Modulation
Cognates
Direction compound
Bilingual Processing
Syntactic Structure
L2 Proficiency
Verbs

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

@article{aa23a247020b4ca6891fa481e0ced8dc,
title = "Switch cost modulations in bilingual sentence processing: evidence from shadowing",
abstract = "In bilingual processing, cognates are associated with facilitatory processing, while switching between languages is associated with a processing cost. This study investigates whether co-activation of cognates affects the magnitude of switch costs in sentence context. A shadowing task was conducted to examine whether verb cognates reduce switch costs in sentences that switched between participants' L1 and L2. In addition, we considered whether these effects were influenced by L2 proficiency, switching direction and cross-linguistic overlap in syntactic structure. Bilinguals were presented with L1 and L2 sentences that contained a language switch preceded by a cognate. Shadowing latencies showed that switching to L2 was more costly than switching to L1. Switch costs in both directions were not modulated by the presence of a verb cognate, and this effect was not affected by syntactic structure or L2 proficiency. The results are informative for the field of bilingual processing and the lexical trigger hypothesis.",
author = "Sybrine Bultena and Ton Dijkstra and {Van Hell}, Adriana",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1080/23273798.2014.964268",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "586--605",
journal = "Language, Cognition and Neuroscience",
issn = "2327-3798",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "5",

}

Switch cost modulations in bilingual sentence processing : evidence from shadowing. / Bultena, Sybrine; Dijkstra, Ton; Van Hell, Adriana.

In: Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, Vol. 30, No. 5, 28.05.2015, p. 586-605.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Switch cost modulations in bilingual sentence processing

T2 - evidence from shadowing

AU - Bultena, Sybrine

AU - Dijkstra, Ton

AU - Van Hell, Adriana

PY - 2015/5/28

Y1 - 2015/5/28

N2 - In bilingual processing, cognates are associated with facilitatory processing, while switching between languages is associated with a processing cost. This study investigates whether co-activation of cognates affects the magnitude of switch costs in sentence context. A shadowing task was conducted to examine whether verb cognates reduce switch costs in sentences that switched between participants' L1 and L2. In addition, we considered whether these effects were influenced by L2 proficiency, switching direction and cross-linguistic overlap in syntactic structure. Bilinguals were presented with L1 and L2 sentences that contained a language switch preceded by a cognate. Shadowing latencies showed that switching to L2 was more costly than switching to L1. Switch costs in both directions were not modulated by the presence of a verb cognate, and this effect was not affected by syntactic structure or L2 proficiency. The results are informative for the field of bilingual processing and the lexical trigger hypothesis.

AB - In bilingual processing, cognates are associated with facilitatory processing, while switching between languages is associated with a processing cost. This study investigates whether co-activation of cognates affects the magnitude of switch costs in sentence context. A shadowing task was conducted to examine whether verb cognates reduce switch costs in sentences that switched between participants' L1 and L2. In addition, we considered whether these effects were influenced by L2 proficiency, switching direction and cross-linguistic overlap in syntactic structure. Bilinguals were presented with L1 and L2 sentences that contained a language switch preceded by a cognate. Shadowing latencies showed that switching to L2 was more costly than switching to L1. Switch costs in both directions were not modulated by the presence of a verb cognate, and this effect was not affected by syntactic structure or L2 proficiency. The results are informative for the field of bilingual processing and the lexical trigger hypothesis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938324648&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938324648&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/23273798.2014.964268

DO - 10.1080/23273798.2014.964268

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84938324648

VL - 30

SP - 586

EP - 605

JO - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

JF - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

SN - 2327-3798

IS - 5

ER -