Sword or shield? A systematic review of the roles FASD evidence plays in judicial proceedings

Anne Douds, Holly R. Stevens, William E. Sumner

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this first-ever systematic review of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in all federal court cases arising prior to 2011, the authors identified 1713 cases, with 131 cases substantively relevant to mental capacity, criminal intent, sentencing, and attorney malpractice. The majority of cases arose after Atkins v. Virginia, the pivotal Supreme Court case that prohibits the death penalty for mentally disabled persons. Among other things, this study reveals that FASD evidence usually defeats a death penalty sentence, but the lower courts reflect inconsistencies in how courts receive and handle mental health evidence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)492-509
Number of pages18
JournalCriminal Justice Policy Review
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2013

Fingerprint

death penalty
evidence
Supreme Court
mental health
alcohol
human being

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Law

Cite this

Douds, Anne ; Stevens, Holly R. ; Sumner, William E. / Sword or shield? A systematic review of the roles FASD evidence plays in judicial proceedings. In: Criminal Justice Policy Review. 2013 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 492-509.
@article{29f8aeb1dddc42829071eba434b75506,
title = "Sword or shield? A systematic review of the roles FASD evidence plays in judicial proceedings",
abstract = "In this first-ever systematic review of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in all federal court cases arising prior to 2011, the authors identified 1713 cases, with 131 cases substantively relevant to mental capacity, criminal intent, sentencing, and attorney malpractice. The majority of cases arose after Atkins v. Virginia, the pivotal Supreme Court case that prohibits the death penalty for mentally disabled persons. Among other things, this study reveals that FASD evidence usually defeats a death penalty sentence, but the lower courts reflect inconsistencies in how courts receive and handle mental health evidence.",
author = "Anne Douds and Stevens, {Holly R.} and Sumner, {William E.}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0887403412447809",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "492--509",
journal = "Criminal Justice Policy Review",
issn = "0887-4034",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Sword or shield? A systematic review of the roles FASD evidence plays in judicial proceedings. / Douds, Anne; Stevens, Holly R.; Sumner, William E.

In: Criminal Justice Policy Review, Vol. 24, No. 4, 01.08.2013, p. 492-509.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sword or shield? A systematic review of the roles FASD evidence plays in judicial proceedings

AU - Douds, Anne

AU - Stevens, Holly R.

AU - Sumner, William E.

PY - 2013/8/1

Y1 - 2013/8/1

N2 - In this first-ever systematic review of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in all federal court cases arising prior to 2011, the authors identified 1713 cases, with 131 cases substantively relevant to mental capacity, criminal intent, sentencing, and attorney malpractice. The majority of cases arose after Atkins v. Virginia, the pivotal Supreme Court case that prohibits the death penalty for mentally disabled persons. Among other things, this study reveals that FASD evidence usually defeats a death penalty sentence, but the lower courts reflect inconsistencies in how courts receive and handle mental health evidence.

AB - In this first-ever systematic review of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in all federal court cases arising prior to 2011, the authors identified 1713 cases, with 131 cases substantively relevant to mental capacity, criminal intent, sentencing, and attorney malpractice. The majority of cases arose after Atkins v. Virginia, the pivotal Supreme Court case that prohibits the death penalty for mentally disabled persons. Among other things, this study reveals that FASD evidence usually defeats a death penalty sentence, but the lower courts reflect inconsistencies in how courts receive and handle mental health evidence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883194359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84883194359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0887403412447809

DO - 10.1177/0887403412447809

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84883194359

VL - 24

SP - 492

EP - 509

JO - Criminal Justice Policy Review

JF - Criminal Justice Policy Review

SN - 0887-4034

IS - 4

ER -