Symbolic meanings, landowner support, and dedicated bioenergy crops in the rural northeastern United States

Weston Eaton, Morey Burnham, Katrina Running, Cynthia Clare Hinrichs, Theresa Selfa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Recent research on social acceptance of large-scale renewable energy systems development has turned from an earlier focus on social opposition, such as Not In My Backyard (NIMBY) stances, toward assessing the ‘symbolic fit’ between meanings for place and proposed technology development that people near development sites hold. This quantitative study extends the symbolic fit hypothesis by testing how varied combinations of meanings for place and technology influence Northeast U.S. rural landowners’ support for dedicated bioenergy crop production in their communities. Drawing on a survey of 907 landowners who have ten or more acres of land suitable for perennial bioenergy crops, we tested ten combinations of symbolic meanings regarding bioenergy crop technologies and land as place. We found that when combined with either protectionist or utilitarian meanings for one's land, viewing bioenergy crop production as an innovative way to address environmental challenges increased the likelihood of support for local development of bioenergy crops. Similarly, different symbolic meanings regarding one's land combined with seeing little community benefit from bioenergy crops reduced the likelihood of support. Given the important role of private landowners in many regions of Western nations considering bioenergy development, the symbolic meanings held by landowners merit attention. By recognizing the complex, conjunctural sources of meanings that inform landowners’ propensities to support new renewable energy project development, new and emerging energy projects can incorporate more polyvalent views into design and implementation and approach public engagement opportunities accordingly.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)247-257
Number of pages11
JournalEnergy Research and Social Science
Volume52
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

bioenergy
Crops
renewable energy
system development
development project
community
opposition
acceptance
energy
Testing

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering
  • Fuel Technology
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{efaae8a907974953885c8e8d0d9df671,
title = "Symbolic meanings, landowner support, and dedicated bioenergy crops in the rural northeastern United States",
abstract = "Recent research on social acceptance of large-scale renewable energy systems development has turned from an earlier focus on social opposition, such as Not In My Backyard (NIMBY) stances, toward assessing the ‘symbolic fit’ between meanings for place and proposed technology development that people near development sites hold. This quantitative study extends the symbolic fit hypothesis by testing how varied combinations of meanings for place and technology influence Northeast U.S. rural landowners’ support for dedicated bioenergy crop production in their communities. Drawing on a survey of 907 landowners who have ten or more acres of land suitable for perennial bioenergy crops, we tested ten combinations of symbolic meanings regarding bioenergy crop technologies and land as place. We found that when combined with either protectionist or utilitarian meanings for one's land, viewing bioenergy crop production as an innovative way to address environmental challenges increased the likelihood of support for local development of bioenergy crops. Similarly, different symbolic meanings regarding one's land combined with seeing little community benefit from bioenergy crops reduced the likelihood of support. Given the important role of private landowners in many regions of Western nations considering bioenergy development, the symbolic meanings held by landowners merit attention. By recognizing the complex, conjunctural sources of meanings that inform landowners’ propensities to support new renewable energy project development, new and emerging energy projects can incorporate more polyvalent views into design and implementation and approach public engagement opportunities accordingly.",
author = "Weston Eaton and Morey Burnham and Katrina Running and Hinrichs, {Cynthia Clare} and Theresa Selfa",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
pages = "247--257",
journal = "Energy Research and Social Science",
issn = "2214-6296",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Symbolic meanings, landowner support, and dedicated bioenergy crops in the rural northeastern United States. / Eaton, Weston; Burnham, Morey; Running, Katrina; Hinrichs, Cynthia Clare; Selfa, Theresa.

In: Energy Research and Social Science, Vol. 52, 01.06.2019, p. 247-257.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Symbolic meanings, landowner support, and dedicated bioenergy crops in the rural northeastern United States

AU - Eaton, Weston

AU - Burnham, Morey

AU - Running, Katrina

AU - Hinrichs, Cynthia Clare

AU - Selfa, Theresa

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Recent research on social acceptance of large-scale renewable energy systems development has turned from an earlier focus on social opposition, such as Not In My Backyard (NIMBY) stances, toward assessing the ‘symbolic fit’ between meanings for place and proposed technology development that people near development sites hold. This quantitative study extends the symbolic fit hypothesis by testing how varied combinations of meanings for place and technology influence Northeast U.S. rural landowners’ support for dedicated bioenergy crop production in their communities. Drawing on a survey of 907 landowners who have ten or more acres of land suitable for perennial bioenergy crops, we tested ten combinations of symbolic meanings regarding bioenergy crop technologies and land as place. We found that when combined with either protectionist or utilitarian meanings for one's land, viewing bioenergy crop production as an innovative way to address environmental challenges increased the likelihood of support for local development of bioenergy crops. Similarly, different symbolic meanings regarding one's land combined with seeing little community benefit from bioenergy crops reduced the likelihood of support. Given the important role of private landowners in many regions of Western nations considering bioenergy development, the symbolic meanings held by landowners merit attention. By recognizing the complex, conjunctural sources of meanings that inform landowners’ propensities to support new renewable energy project development, new and emerging energy projects can incorporate more polyvalent views into design and implementation and approach public engagement opportunities accordingly.

AB - Recent research on social acceptance of large-scale renewable energy systems development has turned from an earlier focus on social opposition, such as Not In My Backyard (NIMBY) stances, toward assessing the ‘symbolic fit’ between meanings for place and proposed technology development that people near development sites hold. This quantitative study extends the symbolic fit hypothesis by testing how varied combinations of meanings for place and technology influence Northeast U.S. rural landowners’ support for dedicated bioenergy crop production in their communities. Drawing on a survey of 907 landowners who have ten or more acres of land suitable for perennial bioenergy crops, we tested ten combinations of symbolic meanings regarding bioenergy crop technologies and land as place. We found that when combined with either protectionist or utilitarian meanings for one's land, viewing bioenergy crop production as an innovative way to address environmental challenges increased the likelihood of support for local development of bioenergy crops. Similarly, different symbolic meanings regarding one's land combined with seeing little community benefit from bioenergy crops reduced the likelihood of support. Given the important role of private landowners in many regions of Western nations considering bioenergy development, the symbolic meanings held by landowners merit attention. By recognizing the complex, conjunctural sources of meanings that inform landowners’ propensities to support new renewable energy project development, new and emerging energy projects can incorporate more polyvalent views into design and implementation and approach public engagement opportunities accordingly.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063634597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063634597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.005

DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85063634597

VL - 52

SP - 247

EP - 257

JO - Energy Research and Social Science

JF - Energy Research and Social Science

SN - 2214-6296

ER -