Synthetic Aperture Sonar Image Contrast Prediction

Daniel A. Cook, Daniel Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Sidescan imaging sonar performance is often described using metrics such as resolution, maximum range, and area coverage rate. These attributes focus on describing how finely and over what area a sensor can make imagery of the seafloor and targets. While these metrics are important, they are inadequate for fully characterizing the quality of sonar imagery. Shadow regions often carry as much, and sometimes even more, information than the direct return from a target. The shadow contrast within an image is therefore a critical property, and it is the result of a complex interaction between the sonar hardware, the environment, and the signal processing. This paper builds on key results from the synthetic aperture radar and sonar literature to develop a comprehensive, quantitative model for predicting the shadow contrast ratio. A model for the contrast ratio is constructed using an approach that is similar to the development of the sonar equation. This ratio describes the average relative level between the seafloor and a shadow. The model includes the effects of the transducer and array design, ambient noise, quantization noise, unwanted volume and surface reverberation, and the signal processing used to construct the synthetic aperture sonar (SAS) imagery. The shadow contrast predicted by the model is compared to the contrast measured from SAS imagery, where close agreement is observed. Examples are presented where the model is applied to a hypothetical high-frequency imaging SAS sensor in a typical operating environment. The shadow contrast ratio is estimated as a function of the sensor range and key parameters of interest, such as receiver channel spacing, sediment backscatter coefficient, and the time-bandwidth product of the transmitted signal. At long ranges, the contrast ratio is limited by additive noise interference, while at near ranges the effect of the receiver channel spacing dominates the contrast ratio through along-track ambiguities. The use of this tool for analysis and prediction of image quality has significant implications for system design, mission planning, and data processing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)523-535
Number of pages13
JournalIEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Synthetic aperture sonar
Sonar
Acoustic noise
Sensors
Signal processing
Imaging techniques
Reverberation
Additive noise
Synthetic aperture radar
Image quality
Transducers
Sediments
Systems analysis
Hardware
Bandwidth
Planning

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ocean Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

@article{38076e0a48a0470e8e08a71b95469b18,
title = "Synthetic Aperture Sonar Image Contrast Prediction",
abstract = "Sidescan imaging sonar performance is often described using metrics such as resolution, maximum range, and area coverage rate. These attributes focus on describing how finely and over what area a sensor can make imagery of the seafloor and targets. While these metrics are important, they are inadequate for fully characterizing the quality of sonar imagery. Shadow regions often carry as much, and sometimes even more, information than the direct return from a target. The shadow contrast within an image is therefore a critical property, and it is the result of a complex interaction between the sonar hardware, the environment, and the signal processing. This paper builds on key results from the synthetic aperture radar and sonar literature to develop a comprehensive, quantitative model for predicting the shadow contrast ratio. A model for the contrast ratio is constructed using an approach that is similar to the development of the sonar equation. This ratio describes the average relative level between the seafloor and a shadow. The model includes the effects of the transducer and array design, ambient noise, quantization noise, unwanted volume and surface reverberation, and the signal processing used to construct the synthetic aperture sonar (SAS) imagery. The shadow contrast predicted by the model is compared to the contrast measured from SAS imagery, where close agreement is observed. Examples are presented where the model is applied to a hypothetical high-frequency imaging SAS sensor in a typical operating environment. The shadow contrast ratio is estimated as a function of the sensor range and key parameters of interest, such as receiver channel spacing, sediment backscatter coefficient, and the time-bandwidth product of the transmitted signal. At long ranges, the contrast ratio is limited by additive noise interference, while at near ranges the effect of the receiver channel spacing dominates the contrast ratio through along-track ambiguities. The use of this tool for analysis and prediction of image quality has significant implications for system design, mission planning, and data processing.",
author = "Cook, {Daniel A.} and Daniel Brown",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/JOE.2017.2702843",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "523--535",
journal = "IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering",
issn = "0364-9059",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Synthetic Aperture Sonar Image Contrast Prediction. / Cook, Daniel A.; Brown, Daniel.

In: IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, Vol. 43, No. 2, 01.04.2018, p. 523-535.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Synthetic Aperture Sonar Image Contrast Prediction

AU - Cook, Daniel A.

AU - Brown, Daniel

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Sidescan imaging sonar performance is often described using metrics such as resolution, maximum range, and area coverage rate. These attributes focus on describing how finely and over what area a sensor can make imagery of the seafloor and targets. While these metrics are important, they are inadequate for fully characterizing the quality of sonar imagery. Shadow regions often carry as much, and sometimes even more, information than the direct return from a target. The shadow contrast within an image is therefore a critical property, and it is the result of a complex interaction between the sonar hardware, the environment, and the signal processing. This paper builds on key results from the synthetic aperture radar and sonar literature to develop a comprehensive, quantitative model for predicting the shadow contrast ratio. A model for the contrast ratio is constructed using an approach that is similar to the development of the sonar equation. This ratio describes the average relative level between the seafloor and a shadow. The model includes the effects of the transducer and array design, ambient noise, quantization noise, unwanted volume and surface reverberation, and the signal processing used to construct the synthetic aperture sonar (SAS) imagery. The shadow contrast predicted by the model is compared to the contrast measured from SAS imagery, where close agreement is observed. Examples are presented where the model is applied to a hypothetical high-frequency imaging SAS sensor in a typical operating environment. The shadow contrast ratio is estimated as a function of the sensor range and key parameters of interest, such as receiver channel spacing, sediment backscatter coefficient, and the time-bandwidth product of the transmitted signal. At long ranges, the contrast ratio is limited by additive noise interference, while at near ranges the effect of the receiver channel spacing dominates the contrast ratio through along-track ambiguities. The use of this tool for analysis and prediction of image quality has significant implications for system design, mission planning, and data processing.

AB - Sidescan imaging sonar performance is often described using metrics such as resolution, maximum range, and area coverage rate. These attributes focus on describing how finely and over what area a sensor can make imagery of the seafloor and targets. While these metrics are important, they are inadequate for fully characterizing the quality of sonar imagery. Shadow regions often carry as much, and sometimes even more, information than the direct return from a target. The shadow contrast within an image is therefore a critical property, and it is the result of a complex interaction between the sonar hardware, the environment, and the signal processing. This paper builds on key results from the synthetic aperture radar and sonar literature to develop a comprehensive, quantitative model for predicting the shadow contrast ratio. A model for the contrast ratio is constructed using an approach that is similar to the development of the sonar equation. This ratio describes the average relative level between the seafloor and a shadow. The model includes the effects of the transducer and array design, ambient noise, quantization noise, unwanted volume and surface reverberation, and the signal processing used to construct the synthetic aperture sonar (SAS) imagery. The shadow contrast predicted by the model is compared to the contrast measured from SAS imagery, where close agreement is observed. Examples are presented where the model is applied to a hypothetical high-frequency imaging SAS sensor in a typical operating environment. The shadow contrast ratio is estimated as a function of the sensor range and key parameters of interest, such as receiver channel spacing, sediment backscatter coefficient, and the time-bandwidth product of the transmitted signal. At long ranges, the contrast ratio is limited by additive noise interference, while at near ranges the effect of the receiver channel spacing dominates the contrast ratio through along-track ambiguities. The use of this tool for analysis and prediction of image quality has significant implications for system design, mission planning, and data processing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029178475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029178475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/JOE.2017.2702843

DO - 10.1109/JOE.2017.2702843

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 523

EP - 535

JO - IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering

JF - IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering

SN - 0364-9059

IS - 2

ER -