Synthetic Turf: History, Design, Maintenance, and Athlete Safety

James R. Jastifer, Andrew Scott McNitt, Christina D. Mack, Richard W. Kent, Kirk A. McCullough, Michael J. Coughlin, Robert B. Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Context: Synthetic turf has become an increasingly common playing surface for athletics and has changed dramatically since its introduction more than 50 years ago. Along with changes to surface design, maintenance needs and recommendations have become more standardized and attentive both to upkeep and player-level factors. In particular, synthetic turf maintenance as it relates to athlete health and safety is an important consideration at all levels of play. Evidence Acquisition: A literature search of MEDLINE and PubMed for publications between the years 1990 and 2018 was conducted. Keywords included synthetic turf, artificial turf, field turf, and playing surface. Additionally, expert opinion through systematic interviews and practical implementation were obtained on synthetic turf design and maintenance practices in the National Football League. Study Design: Clinical review. Level of Evidence: Level 5. Results: Synthetic turf has changed considerably since its inception. Playing surface is a critical component of the athletic environment, playing a role both in performance and in athlete safety. There are several important structural considerations of third-generation synthetic turf systems currently used in the United States that rely heavily on strong and consistent maintenance. A common misconception is that synthetic turf is maintenance free; in fact, however, these surfaces require routine maintenance. Whether athletes experience more injuries on synthetic over natural surfaces is also of interest among various levels and types of sport. Conclusion: Modern synthetic turf is far different than when originally introduced. It requires routine maintenance, even at the level of local athletics. It is important for sports medicine personnel to be familiar with playing surface issues as they are often treating athletes at the time of injury and should maintain a level of awareness of contemporary research and practices regarding the relationships between synthetic turf and injury.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)84-90
Number of pages7
JournalSports Health
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Athletes
History
Maintenance
Safety
Sports
Wounds and Injuries
Sports Medicine
Football
Expert Testimony
PubMed
MEDLINE
Publications
Interviews
Health
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Jastifer, J. R., McNitt, A. S., Mack, C. D., Kent, R. W., McCullough, K. A., Coughlin, M. J., & Anderson, R. B. (2019). Synthetic Turf: History, Design, Maintenance, and Athlete Safety. Sports Health, 11(1), 84-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738118793378
Jastifer, James R. ; McNitt, Andrew Scott ; Mack, Christina D. ; Kent, Richard W. ; McCullough, Kirk A. ; Coughlin, Michael J. ; Anderson, Robert B. / Synthetic Turf : History, Design, Maintenance, and Athlete Safety. In: Sports Health. 2019 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 84-90.
@article{280f974ae1dd4c579063359f3e32cedd,
title = "Synthetic Turf: History, Design, Maintenance, and Athlete Safety",
abstract = "Context: Synthetic turf has become an increasingly common playing surface for athletics and has changed dramatically since its introduction more than 50 years ago. Along with changes to surface design, maintenance needs and recommendations have become more standardized and attentive both to upkeep and player-level factors. In particular, synthetic turf maintenance as it relates to athlete health and safety is an important consideration at all levels of play. Evidence Acquisition: A literature search of MEDLINE and PubMed for publications between the years 1990 and 2018 was conducted. Keywords included synthetic turf, artificial turf, field turf, and playing surface. Additionally, expert opinion through systematic interviews and practical implementation were obtained on synthetic turf design and maintenance practices in the National Football League. Study Design: Clinical review. Level of Evidence: Level 5. Results: Synthetic turf has changed considerably since its inception. Playing surface is a critical component of the athletic environment, playing a role both in performance and in athlete safety. There are several important structural considerations of third-generation synthetic turf systems currently used in the United States that rely heavily on strong and consistent maintenance. A common misconception is that synthetic turf is maintenance free; in fact, however, these surfaces require routine maintenance. Whether athletes experience more injuries on synthetic over natural surfaces is also of interest among various levels and types of sport. Conclusion: Modern synthetic turf is far different than when originally introduced. It requires routine maintenance, even at the level of local athletics. It is important for sports medicine personnel to be familiar with playing surface issues as they are often treating athletes at the time of injury and should maintain a level of awareness of contemporary research and practices regarding the relationships between synthetic turf and injury.",
author = "Jastifer, {James R.} and McNitt, {Andrew Scott} and Mack, {Christina D.} and Kent, {Richard W.} and McCullough, {Kirk A.} and Coughlin, {Michael J.} and Anderson, {Robert B.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1941738118793378",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "84--90",
journal = "Sports Health",
issn = "1941-7381",
publisher = "Sage Periodicals Press",
number = "1",

}

Jastifer, JR, McNitt, AS, Mack, CD, Kent, RW, McCullough, KA, Coughlin, MJ & Anderson, RB 2019, 'Synthetic Turf: History, Design, Maintenance, and Athlete Safety', Sports Health, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 84-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738118793378

Synthetic Turf : History, Design, Maintenance, and Athlete Safety. / Jastifer, James R.; McNitt, Andrew Scott; Mack, Christina D.; Kent, Richard W.; McCullough, Kirk A.; Coughlin, Michael J.; Anderson, Robert B.

In: Sports Health, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 84-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Synthetic Turf

T2 - History, Design, Maintenance, and Athlete Safety

AU - Jastifer, James R.

AU - McNitt, Andrew Scott

AU - Mack, Christina D.

AU - Kent, Richard W.

AU - McCullough, Kirk A.

AU - Coughlin, Michael J.

AU - Anderson, Robert B.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Context: Synthetic turf has become an increasingly common playing surface for athletics and has changed dramatically since its introduction more than 50 years ago. Along with changes to surface design, maintenance needs and recommendations have become more standardized and attentive both to upkeep and player-level factors. In particular, synthetic turf maintenance as it relates to athlete health and safety is an important consideration at all levels of play. Evidence Acquisition: A literature search of MEDLINE and PubMed for publications between the years 1990 and 2018 was conducted. Keywords included synthetic turf, artificial turf, field turf, and playing surface. Additionally, expert opinion through systematic interviews and practical implementation were obtained on synthetic turf design and maintenance practices in the National Football League. Study Design: Clinical review. Level of Evidence: Level 5. Results: Synthetic turf has changed considerably since its inception. Playing surface is a critical component of the athletic environment, playing a role both in performance and in athlete safety. There are several important structural considerations of third-generation synthetic turf systems currently used in the United States that rely heavily on strong and consistent maintenance. A common misconception is that synthetic turf is maintenance free; in fact, however, these surfaces require routine maintenance. Whether athletes experience more injuries on synthetic over natural surfaces is also of interest among various levels and types of sport. Conclusion: Modern synthetic turf is far different than when originally introduced. It requires routine maintenance, even at the level of local athletics. It is important for sports medicine personnel to be familiar with playing surface issues as they are often treating athletes at the time of injury and should maintain a level of awareness of contemporary research and practices regarding the relationships between synthetic turf and injury.

AB - Context: Synthetic turf has become an increasingly common playing surface for athletics and has changed dramatically since its introduction more than 50 years ago. Along with changes to surface design, maintenance needs and recommendations have become more standardized and attentive both to upkeep and player-level factors. In particular, synthetic turf maintenance as it relates to athlete health and safety is an important consideration at all levels of play. Evidence Acquisition: A literature search of MEDLINE and PubMed for publications between the years 1990 and 2018 was conducted. Keywords included synthetic turf, artificial turf, field turf, and playing surface. Additionally, expert opinion through systematic interviews and practical implementation were obtained on synthetic turf design and maintenance practices in the National Football League. Study Design: Clinical review. Level of Evidence: Level 5. Results: Synthetic turf has changed considerably since its inception. Playing surface is a critical component of the athletic environment, playing a role both in performance and in athlete safety. There are several important structural considerations of third-generation synthetic turf systems currently used in the United States that rely heavily on strong and consistent maintenance. A common misconception is that synthetic turf is maintenance free; in fact, however, these surfaces require routine maintenance. Whether athletes experience more injuries on synthetic over natural surfaces is also of interest among various levels and types of sport. Conclusion: Modern synthetic turf is far different than when originally introduced. It requires routine maintenance, even at the level of local athletics. It is important for sports medicine personnel to be familiar with playing surface issues as they are often treating athletes at the time of injury and should maintain a level of awareness of contemporary research and practices regarding the relationships between synthetic turf and injury.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052566976&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052566976&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1941738118793378

DO - 10.1177/1941738118793378

M3 - Review article

C2 - 30096021

AN - SCOPUS:85052566976

VL - 11

SP - 84

EP - 90

JO - Sports Health

JF - Sports Health

SN - 1941-7381

IS - 1

ER -

Jastifer JR, McNitt AS, Mack CD, Kent RW, McCullough KA, Coughlin MJ et al. Synthetic Turf: History, Design, Maintenance, and Athlete Safety. Sports Health. 2019 Jan 1;11(1):84-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738118793378