Systematic Review of Patients’ and Parents’ Preferences for ADHD Treatment Options and Processes of Care

Nicole K. Schatz, Gregory A. Fabiano, Charles E. Cunningham, Susan dosReis, Daniel A. Waschbusch, Stephanie Jerome, Kellina Lupas, Karen L. Morris

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Patient preferences are an important topic of study with respect to attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) interventions, as there are multiple treatment choices available, multiple developmental levels to consider, and multiple potential individuals involved in treatment (children, parents, and adults with ADHD). Stated preference methods such as discrete choice experiment (DCE), best-worst scaling (BWS), and other utility value methods such as standard gamble interview (SGI) and time trade-off (TTO) are becoming more common in research addressing preferences for ADHD treatments. A synthesis of this research may facilitate improved patient-centered and family-centered treatment for ADHD. Objective: The purpose of this review was to synthesize reports across existing DCE, BWS, TTO, and SGI studies to assess which aspects of ADHD treatment are most studied as well as most preferred and influential in treatment decisions. Data Sources: MEDLINE, PsycINFO. Study Selection: A total of 41 studies referring to preferences for ADHD treatment were identified through the initial search and contact with researchers. Of these, 13 reported ADHD treatment preference data from a study using DCE, BWS, or SGI methods. No TTO studies were identified that met inclusion criteria. Results: Methods and designs varied considerably across studies. Relatively few studies focused on preferences among children, adolescents, and adults compared with those that focused on the preferences of parents of children with ADHD. The majority of studies focused primarily on medication treatments, with many fewer focused on psychosocial treatments. Some studies indicated that parents of children with ADHD prefer to avoid stimulant medications in favor of behavioral or psychosocial interventions. Others report that parents see medication as a preferred treatment. Treatment outcome is a particularly salient attribute for treatment decisions for many informants. Conclusions: Potential outcomes of various treatments play a proximal role in patients’ and families’ decisions for ADHD treatment. Because the majority of studies focus on medication treatments for children with ADHD, more research is necessary to understand preferences related to behavioral and other psychosocial treatments both as stand-alone interventions and used in combination with medication. Additional research is also needed to assess the treatment preferences of adults with ADHD. In general, DCE, BWS, and SGI methods allow measurement of patient preferences in a manner that approximates the uncertainty and trade-offs inherent in real-world treatment decision making and provides valuable information to inform patient-centered and family-centered treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)483-497
Number of pages15
JournalPatient
Volume8
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

Patient Preference
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity
Parents
Therapeutics
Interviews
Research
Information Storage and Retrieval

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Nursing (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Schatz, N. K., Fabiano, G. A., Cunningham, C. E., dosReis, S., Waschbusch, D. A., Jerome, S., ... Morris, K. L. (2015). Systematic Review of Patients’ and Parents’ Preferences for ADHD Treatment Options and Processes of Care. Patient, 8(6), 483-497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-015-0112-5
Schatz, Nicole K. ; Fabiano, Gregory A. ; Cunningham, Charles E. ; dosReis, Susan ; Waschbusch, Daniel A. ; Jerome, Stephanie ; Lupas, Kellina ; Morris, Karen L. / Systematic Review of Patients’ and Parents’ Preferences for ADHD Treatment Options and Processes of Care. In: Patient. 2015 ; Vol. 8, No. 6. pp. 483-497.
@article{13bfefbd4edd40808506f9e28e869445,
title = "Systematic Review of Patients’ and Parents’ Preferences for ADHD Treatment Options and Processes of Care",
abstract = "Background: Patient preferences are an important topic of study with respect to attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) interventions, as there are multiple treatment choices available, multiple developmental levels to consider, and multiple potential individuals involved in treatment (children, parents, and adults with ADHD). Stated preference methods such as discrete choice experiment (DCE), best-worst scaling (BWS), and other utility value methods such as standard gamble interview (SGI) and time trade-off (TTO) are becoming more common in research addressing preferences for ADHD treatments. A synthesis of this research may facilitate improved patient-centered and family-centered treatment for ADHD. Objective: The purpose of this review was to synthesize reports across existing DCE, BWS, TTO, and SGI studies to assess which aspects of ADHD treatment are most studied as well as most preferred and influential in treatment decisions. Data Sources: MEDLINE, PsycINFO. Study Selection: A total of 41 studies referring to preferences for ADHD treatment were identified through the initial search and contact with researchers. Of these, 13 reported ADHD treatment preference data from a study using DCE, BWS, or SGI methods. No TTO studies were identified that met inclusion criteria. Results: Methods and designs varied considerably across studies. Relatively few studies focused on preferences among children, adolescents, and adults compared with those that focused on the preferences of parents of children with ADHD. The majority of studies focused primarily on medication treatments, with many fewer focused on psychosocial treatments. Some studies indicated that parents of children with ADHD prefer to avoid stimulant medications in favor of behavioral or psychosocial interventions. Others report that parents see medication as a preferred treatment. Treatment outcome is a particularly salient attribute for treatment decisions for many informants. Conclusions: Potential outcomes of various treatments play a proximal role in patients’ and families’ decisions for ADHD treatment. Because the majority of studies focus on medication treatments for children with ADHD, more research is necessary to understand preferences related to behavioral and other psychosocial treatments both as stand-alone interventions and used in combination with medication. Additional research is also needed to assess the treatment preferences of adults with ADHD. In general, DCE, BWS, and SGI methods allow measurement of patient preferences in a manner that approximates the uncertainty and trade-offs inherent in real-world treatment decision making and provides valuable information to inform patient-centered and family-centered treatment.",
author = "Schatz, {Nicole K.} and Fabiano, {Gregory A.} and Cunningham, {Charles E.} and Susan dosReis and Waschbusch, {Daniel A.} and Stephanie Jerome and Kellina Lupas and Morris, {Karen L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s40271-015-0112-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "483--497",
journal = "Patient",
issn = "1178-1653",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",
number = "6",

}

Schatz, NK, Fabiano, GA, Cunningham, CE, dosReis, S, Waschbusch, DA, Jerome, S, Lupas, K & Morris, KL 2015, 'Systematic Review of Patients’ and Parents’ Preferences for ADHD Treatment Options and Processes of Care', Patient, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 483-497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-015-0112-5

Systematic Review of Patients’ and Parents’ Preferences for ADHD Treatment Options and Processes of Care. / Schatz, Nicole K.; Fabiano, Gregory A.; Cunningham, Charles E.; dosReis, Susan; Waschbusch, Daniel A.; Jerome, Stephanie; Lupas, Kellina; Morris, Karen L.

In: Patient, Vol. 8, No. 6, 01.12.2015, p. 483-497.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic Review of Patients’ and Parents’ Preferences for ADHD Treatment Options and Processes of Care

AU - Schatz, Nicole K.

AU - Fabiano, Gregory A.

AU - Cunningham, Charles E.

AU - dosReis, Susan

AU - Waschbusch, Daniel A.

AU - Jerome, Stephanie

AU - Lupas, Kellina

AU - Morris, Karen L.

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Background: Patient preferences are an important topic of study with respect to attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) interventions, as there are multiple treatment choices available, multiple developmental levels to consider, and multiple potential individuals involved in treatment (children, parents, and adults with ADHD). Stated preference methods such as discrete choice experiment (DCE), best-worst scaling (BWS), and other utility value methods such as standard gamble interview (SGI) and time trade-off (TTO) are becoming more common in research addressing preferences for ADHD treatments. A synthesis of this research may facilitate improved patient-centered and family-centered treatment for ADHD. Objective: The purpose of this review was to synthesize reports across existing DCE, BWS, TTO, and SGI studies to assess which aspects of ADHD treatment are most studied as well as most preferred and influential in treatment decisions. Data Sources: MEDLINE, PsycINFO. Study Selection: A total of 41 studies referring to preferences for ADHD treatment were identified through the initial search and contact with researchers. Of these, 13 reported ADHD treatment preference data from a study using DCE, BWS, or SGI methods. No TTO studies were identified that met inclusion criteria. Results: Methods and designs varied considerably across studies. Relatively few studies focused on preferences among children, adolescents, and adults compared with those that focused on the preferences of parents of children with ADHD. The majority of studies focused primarily on medication treatments, with many fewer focused on psychosocial treatments. Some studies indicated that parents of children with ADHD prefer to avoid stimulant medications in favor of behavioral or psychosocial interventions. Others report that parents see medication as a preferred treatment. Treatment outcome is a particularly salient attribute for treatment decisions for many informants. Conclusions: Potential outcomes of various treatments play a proximal role in patients’ and families’ decisions for ADHD treatment. Because the majority of studies focus on medication treatments for children with ADHD, more research is necessary to understand preferences related to behavioral and other psychosocial treatments both as stand-alone interventions and used in combination with medication. Additional research is also needed to assess the treatment preferences of adults with ADHD. In general, DCE, BWS, and SGI methods allow measurement of patient preferences in a manner that approximates the uncertainty and trade-offs inherent in real-world treatment decision making and provides valuable information to inform patient-centered and family-centered treatment.

AB - Background: Patient preferences are an important topic of study with respect to attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) interventions, as there are multiple treatment choices available, multiple developmental levels to consider, and multiple potential individuals involved in treatment (children, parents, and adults with ADHD). Stated preference methods such as discrete choice experiment (DCE), best-worst scaling (BWS), and other utility value methods such as standard gamble interview (SGI) and time trade-off (TTO) are becoming more common in research addressing preferences for ADHD treatments. A synthesis of this research may facilitate improved patient-centered and family-centered treatment for ADHD. Objective: The purpose of this review was to synthesize reports across existing DCE, BWS, TTO, and SGI studies to assess which aspects of ADHD treatment are most studied as well as most preferred and influential in treatment decisions. Data Sources: MEDLINE, PsycINFO. Study Selection: A total of 41 studies referring to preferences for ADHD treatment were identified through the initial search and contact with researchers. Of these, 13 reported ADHD treatment preference data from a study using DCE, BWS, or SGI methods. No TTO studies were identified that met inclusion criteria. Results: Methods and designs varied considerably across studies. Relatively few studies focused on preferences among children, adolescents, and adults compared with those that focused on the preferences of parents of children with ADHD. The majority of studies focused primarily on medication treatments, with many fewer focused on psychosocial treatments. Some studies indicated that parents of children with ADHD prefer to avoid stimulant medications in favor of behavioral or psychosocial interventions. Others report that parents see medication as a preferred treatment. Treatment outcome is a particularly salient attribute for treatment decisions for many informants. Conclusions: Potential outcomes of various treatments play a proximal role in patients’ and families’ decisions for ADHD treatment. Because the majority of studies focus on medication treatments for children with ADHD, more research is necessary to understand preferences related to behavioral and other psychosocial treatments both as stand-alone interventions and used in combination with medication. Additional research is also needed to assess the treatment preferences of adults with ADHD. In general, DCE, BWS, and SGI methods allow measurement of patient preferences in a manner that approximates the uncertainty and trade-offs inherent in real-world treatment decision making and provides valuable information to inform patient-centered and family-centered treatment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948576702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948576702&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40271-015-0112-5

DO - 10.1007/s40271-015-0112-5

M3 - Review article

C2 - 25644223

AN - SCOPUS:84948576702

VL - 8

SP - 483

EP - 497

JO - Patient

JF - Patient

SN - 1178-1653

IS - 6

ER -