Systemic constraints to ecological well-being: The case of the 1985 food security act

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although the conservation title of the 1985 Food Security Act was hailed by many as revolutionary in its attempts to control soil erosion, it has failed to live up to its billing. A theory is used that asserts that the state's systemic commitment to promoting capitalist growth constrains it from establishing and implementing policies that accomplish anything more than displacing one environmental problem onto others. The-theory is tested through a discourse analysis of the hearings surrounding the Federal government's attempt to control soil erosion through the 1985 Food Security Act, which revealed that policy recommendations challenging the drive to maximize efficiency and production were declared flawed and unacceptable. Hence, the hearings were systematically distorted in favor of the dominant instrumental rationality. It is concluded that government policy initiatives alone are insufficient and that creating alternative social organizations of production is necessary to promote ecological wellbeing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)133-157
Number of pages25
JournalRural Sociology
Volume64
Issue number1
StatePublished - Dec 1 1999

Fingerprint

erosion
well-being
act
instrumental rationality
food
discourse analysis
Federal Government
government policy
environmental impact
conservation
commitment
efficiency

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{678d3389fb0c44d49eaa75299adc49f8,
title = "Systemic constraints to ecological well-being: The case of the 1985 food security act",
abstract = "Although the conservation title of the 1985 Food Security Act was hailed by many as revolutionary in its attempts to control soil erosion, it has failed to live up to its billing. A theory is used that asserts that the state's systemic commitment to promoting capitalist growth constrains it from establishing and implementing policies that accomplish anything more than displacing one environmental problem onto others. The-theory is tested through a discourse analysis of the hearings surrounding the Federal government's attempt to control soil erosion through the 1985 Food Security Act, which revealed that policy recommendations challenging the drive to maximize efficiency and production were declared flawed and unacceptable. Hence, the hearings were systematically distorted in favor of the dominant instrumental rationality. It is concluded that government policy initiatives alone are insufficient and that creating alternative social organizations of production is necessary to promote ecological wellbeing.",
author = "Glenna, {Leland Luther}",
year = "1999",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "133--157",
journal = "Rural Sociology",
issn = "0036-0112",
publisher = "Rural Sociological Society",
number = "1",

}

Systemic constraints to ecological well-being : The case of the 1985 food security act. / Glenna, Leland Luther.

In: Rural Sociology, Vol. 64, No. 1, 01.12.1999, p. 133-157.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systemic constraints to ecological well-being

T2 - The case of the 1985 food security act

AU - Glenna, Leland Luther

PY - 1999/12/1

Y1 - 1999/12/1

N2 - Although the conservation title of the 1985 Food Security Act was hailed by many as revolutionary in its attempts to control soil erosion, it has failed to live up to its billing. A theory is used that asserts that the state's systemic commitment to promoting capitalist growth constrains it from establishing and implementing policies that accomplish anything more than displacing one environmental problem onto others. The-theory is tested through a discourse analysis of the hearings surrounding the Federal government's attempt to control soil erosion through the 1985 Food Security Act, which revealed that policy recommendations challenging the drive to maximize efficiency and production were declared flawed and unacceptable. Hence, the hearings were systematically distorted in favor of the dominant instrumental rationality. It is concluded that government policy initiatives alone are insufficient and that creating alternative social organizations of production is necessary to promote ecological wellbeing.

AB - Although the conservation title of the 1985 Food Security Act was hailed by many as revolutionary in its attempts to control soil erosion, it has failed to live up to its billing. A theory is used that asserts that the state's systemic commitment to promoting capitalist growth constrains it from establishing and implementing policies that accomplish anything more than displacing one environmental problem onto others. The-theory is tested through a discourse analysis of the hearings surrounding the Federal government's attempt to control soil erosion through the 1985 Food Security Act, which revealed that policy recommendations challenging the drive to maximize efficiency and production were declared flawed and unacceptable. Hence, the hearings were systematically distorted in favor of the dominant instrumental rationality. It is concluded that government policy initiatives alone are insufficient and that creating alternative social organizations of production is necessary to promote ecological wellbeing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033066174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033066174&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033066174

VL - 64

SP - 133

EP - 157

JO - Rural Sociology

JF - Rural Sociology

SN - 0036-0112

IS - 1

ER -