Systems, man, and the paradox of structure

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The design, creation, and analysis of structure are central to both science and engineering. The Paradox of Structure is that, whatever its nature, any structure is both enabling and limiting at the same time. Each person manages this paradox differently, as described by the Adaption-Innovation theory of M. J. Kirton. This paper provides a summary of key points in Adaption-Innovation theory, as well as some of its applications in engineering research and education, including a new initiative by the author to explore the relationship between the cognitive styles of inventors and the types of inventions they create. The Paradox of Structure is also discussed here in the context of technical systems, with specific examples to illustrate its impact on the development of new ideas. Finally, the ramifications of this paradox are considered as the boundaries of science and engineering are moved forward in an age of increased vigilance and system security.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2374-2380
Number of pages7
JournalProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics
Volume3
StatePublished - Nov 24 2003

Fingerprint

Innovation
Engineering research
Patents and inventions
Engineering education
Security systems

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Hardware and Architecture

Cite this

@article{7ab513535fda4701a62769960305ea0c,
title = "Systems, man, and the paradox of structure",
abstract = "The design, creation, and analysis of structure are central to both science and engineering. The Paradox of Structure is that, whatever its nature, any structure is both enabling and limiting at the same time. Each person manages this paradox differently, as described by the Adaption-Innovation theory of M. J. Kirton. This paper provides a summary of key points in Adaption-Innovation theory, as well as some of its applications in engineering research and education, including a new initiative by the author to explore the relationship between the cognitive styles of inventors and the types of inventions they create. The Paradox of Structure is also discussed here in the context of technical systems, with specific examples to illustrate its impact on the development of new ideas. Finally, the ramifications of this paradox are considered as the boundaries of science and engineering are moved forward in an age of increased vigilance and system security.",
author = "Jablokow, {Kathryn Weed}",
year = "2003",
month = "11",
day = "24",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "2374--2380",
journal = "Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics",
issn = "0884-3627",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

}

Systems, man, and the paradox of structure. / Jablokow, Kathryn Weed.

In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 3, 24.11.2003, p. 2374-2380.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systems, man, and the paradox of structure

AU - Jablokow, Kathryn Weed

PY - 2003/11/24

Y1 - 2003/11/24

N2 - The design, creation, and analysis of structure are central to both science and engineering. The Paradox of Structure is that, whatever its nature, any structure is both enabling and limiting at the same time. Each person manages this paradox differently, as described by the Adaption-Innovation theory of M. J. Kirton. This paper provides a summary of key points in Adaption-Innovation theory, as well as some of its applications in engineering research and education, including a new initiative by the author to explore the relationship between the cognitive styles of inventors and the types of inventions they create. The Paradox of Structure is also discussed here in the context of technical systems, with specific examples to illustrate its impact on the development of new ideas. Finally, the ramifications of this paradox are considered as the boundaries of science and engineering are moved forward in an age of increased vigilance and system security.

AB - The design, creation, and analysis of structure are central to both science and engineering. The Paradox of Structure is that, whatever its nature, any structure is both enabling and limiting at the same time. Each person manages this paradox differently, as described by the Adaption-Innovation theory of M. J. Kirton. This paper provides a summary of key points in Adaption-Innovation theory, as well as some of its applications in engineering research and education, including a new initiative by the author to explore the relationship between the cognitive styles of inventors and the types of inventions they create. The Paradox of Structure is also discussed here in the context of technical systems, with specific examples to illustrate its impact on the development of new ideas. Finally, the ramifications of this paradox are considered as the boundaries of science and engineering are moved forward in an age of increased vigilance and system security.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242721917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242721917&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference article

VL - 3

SP - 2374

EP - 2380

JO - Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics

JF - Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics

SN - 0884-3627

ER -