Taking levels of analysis in humor more seriously: Comment on romero and arendt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Humor is a phenomenon that can simultaneously coexist at the individual, dyadic, and group levels, making its measurement and conceptualization complex. In a recent field study, Romero and Arendt (2011) examined relationships between four humor styles (i.e., affiliative, self-enhancing, aggressive, self-defeating) and four outcomes (i.e., stress, satisfaction with co-workers, team cooperation, organizational commitment), however, the latter was apparently measured as a self-report at the individual level of analysis. Their interesting results indicated different humor styles can have either positive or negative effects on these outcome variables. However, if their operational definition-and hence their conceptualization-of humor is based on self-report by the initiator, it may be problematic to use it at the dyadic and group levels because it potentially mixes levels of analysis and may cause misalignment between data and theory. Cautions and implications for future research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)527-534
Number of pages8
JournalPsychological reports
Volume110
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2012

Fingerprint

Wit and Humor
Self Report

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{6b90a542c28b47c4b1fc714d7c563f7e,
title = "Taking levels of analysis in humor more seriously: Comment on romero and arendt",
abstract = "Humor is a phenomenon that can simultaneously coexist at the individual, dyadic, and group levels, making its measurement and conceptualization complex. In a recent field study, Romero and Arendt (2011) examined relationships between four humor styles (i.e., affiliative, self-enhancing, aggressive, self-defeating) and four outcomes (i.e., stress, satisfaction with co-workers, team cooperation, organizational commitment), however, the latter was apparently measured as a self-report at the individual level of analysis. Their interesting results indicated different humor styles can have either positive or negative effects on these outcome variables. However, if their operational definition-and hence their conceptualization-of humor is based on self-report by the initiator, it may be problematic to use it at the dyadic and group levels because it potentially mixes levels of analysis and may cause misalignment between data and theory. Cautions and implications for future research are discussed.",
author = "Sosik, {John Joseph}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2466/03.PR0.110.2.527-534",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "110",
pages = "527--534",
journal = "Psychological Reports",
issn = "0033-2941",
publisher = "Ammons Scientific Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Taking levels of analysis in humor more seriously : Comment on romero and arendt. / Sosik, John Joseph.

In: Psychological reports, Vol. 110, No. 2, 01.04.2012, p. 527-534.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Taking levels of analysis in humor more seriously

T2 - Comment on romero and arendt

AU - Sosik, John Joseph

PY - 2012/4/1

Y1 - 2012/4/1

N2 - Humor is a phenomenon that can simultaneously coexist at the individual, dyadic, and group levels, making its measurement and conceptualization complex. In a recent field study, Romero and Arendt (2011) examined relationships between four humor styles (i.e., affiliative, self-enhancing, aggressive, self-defeating) and four outcomes (i.e., stress, satisfaction with co-workers, team cooperation, organizational commitment), however, the latter was apparently measured as a self-report at the individual level of analysis. Their interesting results indicated different humor styles can have either positive or negative effects on these outcome variables. However, if their operational definition-and hence their conceptualization-of humor is based on self-report by the initiator, it may be problematic to use it at the dyadic and group levels because it potentially mixes levels of analysis and may cause misalignment between data and theory. Cautions and implications for future research are discussed.

AB - Humor is a phenomenon that can simultaneously coexist at the individual, dyadic, and group levels, making its measurement and conceptualization complex. In a recent field study, Romero and Arendt (2011) examined relationships between four humor styles (i.e., affiliative, self-enhancing, aggressive, self-defeating) and four outcomes (i.e., stress, satisfaction with co-workers, team cooperation, organizational commitment), however, the latter was apparently measured as a self-report at the individual level of analysis. Their interesting results indicated different humor styles can have either positive or negative effects on these outcome variables. However, if their operational definition-and hence their conceptualization-of humor is based on self-report by the initiator, it may be problematic to use it at the dyadic and group levels because it potentially mixes levels of analysis and may cause misalignment between data and theory. Cautions and implications for future research are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861212197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861212197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2466/03.PR0.110.2.527-534

DO - 10.2466/03.PR0.110.2.527-534

M3 - Article

C2 - 22662407

AN - SCOPUS:84861212197

VL - 110

SP - 527

EP - 534

JO - Psychological Reports

JF - Psychological Reports

SN - 0033-2941

IS - 2

ER -