Tangential bicortical locked fixation improves stability in Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femur fractures: A biomechanical study

Gregory S. Lewis, Cyrus T. Caroom, Hwabok Wee, Darin Jurgensmeier, Shane D. Rothermel, Michelle A. Bramer, John Spence Reid

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The biomechanical difficulty in fixation of a Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fracture is purchase of the proximal femoral segment in the presence of the hip stem. Several newer technologies provide the ability to place bicortical locking screws tangential to the hip stem with much longer lengths of screw purchase compared with unicortical screws. This biomechanical study compares the stability of 2 of these newer constructs to previous methods. Methods: Thirty composite synthetic femurs were prepared with cemented hip stems. The distal femur segment was osteotomized, and plates were fixed proximally with either (1) cerclage cables, (2) locked unicortical screws, (3) a composite of locked screws and cables, or tangentially directed bicortical locking screws using either (4) a stainless steel locking compression plate system with a Locking Attachment Plate (Synthes) or (5) a titanium alloy Non-Contact Bridging system (Zimmer). Specimens were tested to failure in either axial or torsional quasistatic loading modes (n = 3) after 20 moderate load preconditioning cycles. Stiffness, maximum force, and failure mechanism were determined. Results: Bicortical constructs resisted higher (by an average of at least 27%) maximum forces than the other 3 constructs in torsional loading (P < 0.05). Cables constructs exhibited lower maximum force than all other constructs, in both axial and torsional loading. The bicortical titanium construct was stiffer than the bicortical stainless steel construct in axial loading. Conclusions: Proximal fixation stability is likely improved with the use of bicortical locking screws as compared with traditional unicortical screws and cable techniques. In this study with a limited sample size, we found the addition of cerclage cables to unicortical screws may not offer much improvement in biomechanical stability of unstable B1 fractures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e364-e370
JournalJournal of orthopaedic trauma
Volume29
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 23 2015

Fingerprint

Periprosthetic Fractures
Femur
Hip
Stainless Steel
Weight-Bearing
Titanium
Thigh
Sample Size
Technology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Lewis, Gregory S. ; Caroom, Cyrus T. ; Wee, Hwabok ; Jurgensmeier, Darin ; Rothermel, Shane D. ; Bramer, Michelle A. ; Reid, John Spence. / Tangential bicortical locked fixation improves stability in Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femur fractures : A biomechanical study. In: Journal of orthopaedic trauma. 2015 ; Vol. 29, No. 10. pp. e364-e370.
@article{f164f301dffd483b86b4b4e3f0f899cf,
title = "Tangential bicortical locked fixation improves stability in Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femur fractures: A biomechanical study",
abstract = "Objectives: The biomechanical difficulty in fixation of a Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fracture is purchase of the proximal femoral segment in the presence of the hip stem. Several newer technologies provide the ability to place bicortical locking screws tangential to the hip stem with much longer lengths of screw purchase compared with unicortical screws. This biomechanical study compares the stability of 2 of these newer constructs to previous methods. Methods: Thirty composite synthetic femurs were prepared with cemented hip stems. The distal femur segment was osteotomized, and plates were fixed proximally with either (1) cerclage cables, (2) locked unicortical screws, (3) a composite of locked screws and cables, or tangentially directed bicortical locking screws using either (4) a stainless steel locking compression plate system with a Locking Attachment Plate (Synthes) or (5) a titanium alloy Non-Contact Bridging system (Zimmer). Specimens were tested to failure in either axial or torsional quasistatic loading modes (n = 3) after 20 moderate load preconditioning cycles. Stiffness, maximum force, and failure mechanism were determined. Results: Bicortical constructs resisted higher (by an average of at least 27{\%}) maximum forces than the other 3 constructs in torsional loading (P < 0.05). Cables constructs exhibited lower maximum force than all other constructs, in both axial and torsional loading. The bicortical titanium construct was stiffer than the bicortical stainless steel construct in axial loading. Conclusions: Proximal fixation stability is likely improved with the use of bicortical locking screws as compared with traditional unicortical screws and cable techniques. In this study with a limited sample size, we found the addition of cerclage cables to unicortical screws may not offer much improvement in biomechanical stability of unstable B1 fractures.",
author = "Lewis, {Gregory S.} and Caroom, {Cyrus T.} and Hwabok Wee and Darin Jurgensmeier and Rothermel, {Shane D.} and Bramer, {Michelle A.} and Reid, {John Spence}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1097/BOT.0000000000000365",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "e364--e370",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma",
issn = "0890-5339",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

Tangential bicortical locked fixation improves stability in Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femur fractures : A biomechanical study. / Lewis, Gregory S.; Caroom, Cyrus T.; Wee, Hwabok; Jurgensmeier, Darin; Rothermel, Shane D.; Bramer, Michelle A.; Reid, John Spence.

In: Journal of orthopaedic trauma, Vol. 29, No. 10, 23.10.2015, p. e364-e370.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tangential bicortical locked fixation improves stability in Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femur fractures

T2 - A biomechanical study

AU - Lewis, Gregory S.

AU - Caroom, Cyrus T.

AU - Wee, Hwabok

AU - Jurgensmeier, Darin

AU - Rothermel, Shane D.

AU - Bramer, Michelle A.

AU - Reid, John Spence

PY - 2015/10/23

Y1 - 2015/10/23

N2 - Objectives: The biomechanical difficulty in fixation of a Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fracture is purchase of the proximal femoral segment in the presence of the hip stem. Several newer technologies provide the ability to place bicortical locking screws tangential to the hip stem with much longer lengths of screw purchase compared with unicortical screws. This biomechanical study compares the stability of 2 of these newer constructs to previous methods. Methods: Thirty composite synthetic femurs were prepared with cemented hip stems. The distal femur segment was osteotomized, and plates were fixed proximally with either (1) cerclage cables, (2) locked unicortical screws, (3) a composite of locked screws and cables, or tangentially directed bicortical locking screws using either (4) a stainless steel locking compression plate system with a Locking Attachment Plate (Synthes) or (5) a titanium alloy Non-Contact Bridging system (Zimmer). Specimens were tested to failure in either axial or torsional quasistatic loading modes (n = 3) after 20 moderate load preconditioning cycles. Stiffness, maximum force, and failure mechanism were determined. Results: Bicortical constructs resisted higher (by an average of at least 27%) maximum forces than the other 3 constructs in torsional loading (P < 0.05). Cables constructs exhibited lower maximum force than all other constructs, in both axial and torsional loading. The bicortical titanium construct was stiffer than the bicortical stainless steel construct in axial loading. Conclusions: Proximal fixation stability is likely improved with the use of bicortical locking screws as compared with traditional unicortical screws and cable techniques. In this study with a limited sample size, we found the addition of cerclage cables to unicortical screws may not offer much improvement in biomechanical stability of unstable B1 fractures.

AB - Objectives: The biomechanical difficulty in fixation of a Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fracture is purchase of the proximal femoral segment in the presence of the hip stem. Several newer technologies provide the ability to place bicortical locking screws tangential to the hip stem with much longer lengths of screw purchase compared with unicortical screws. This biomechanical study compares the stability of 2 of these newer constructs to previous methods. Methods: Thirty composite synthetic femurs were prepared with cemented hip stems. The distal femur segment was osteotomized, and plates were fixed proximally with either (1) cerclage cables, (2) locked unicortical screws, (3) a composite of locked screws and cables, or tangentially directed bicortical locking screws using either (4) a stainless steel locking compression plate system with a Locking Attachment Plate (Synthes) or (5) a titanium alloy Non-Contact Bridging system (Zimmer). Specimens were tested to failure in either axial or torsional quasistatic loading modes (n = 3) after 20 moderate load preconditioning cycles. Stiffness, maximum force, and failure mechanism were determined. Results: Bicortical constructs resisted higher (by an average of at least 27%) maximum forces than the other 3 constructs in torsional loading (P < 0.05). Cables constructs exhibited lower maximum force than all other constructs, in both axial and torsional loading. The bicortical titanium construct was stiffer than the bicortical stainless steel construct in axial loading. Conclusions: Proximal fixation stability is likely improved with the use of bicortical locking screws as compared with traditional unicortical screws and cable techniques. In this study with a limited sample size, we found the addition of cerclage cables to unicortical screws may not offer much improvement in biomechanical stability of unstable B1 fractures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942119993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942119993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000365

DO - 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000365

M3 - Article

C2 - 26053467

AN - SCOPUS:84942119993

VL - 29

SP - e364-e370

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

SN - 0890-5339

IS - 10

ER -