Tattoos in policing

a survey of state police policies

Sara M. McMullen, Jennifer Catherine Gibbs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Policing agencies across the USA have cited difficulty recruiting qualified applicants, thus leaving many employment vacancies unfilled. One reason for this challenge may be that those who would make exceptional police officers are barred from employment because of their body art. Varying appearance policies exist concerning tattoos, yet little is known about these policies. The purpose of this paper is to survey the tattoo policies of policing agencies. Design/methodology/approach: The tattoo policies of all 50 state-level policing agencies were reviewed to explore similarities and state-level correlates. Findings: The majority, but not all, of state police have some type of appearance policy targeting tattoos. State policing agencies that have a “no visibility” policy regarding tattoos more often were in states with a low percentage of millennial residents, high percentage of young veterans, men and non-Hispanic white citizens, and low crime; t-tests indicate “no visibility” policy states significantly differed from other states in the percentage of non-Hispanic whites and crime. Further, state policing agencies with a “no visibility” policy tended to be in northeastern states, with southern states having the fewest state policing agencies with such policies, although the χ2 test was non-significant. Originality/value: Despite the ubiquity of tattoos in the American society, the literature is scant with studies of police appearance policies regarding tattoos. This study provides a partial summary of tattoo policies at the state policing level.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)408-420
Number of pages13
JournalPolicing
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 10 2019

Fingerprint

tattoo
Police
police
Crime
offense
Surveys and Questionnaires
police officer
applicant
Veterans
Art
art
resident
citizen

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

McMullen, Sara M. ; Gibbs, Jennifer Catherine. / Tattoos in policing : a survey of state police policies. In: Policing. 2019 ; Vol. 42, No. 3. pp. 408-420.
@article{250175a04f4b4055af8d7ca69bb9d662,
title = "Tattoos in policing: a survey of state police policies",
abstract = "Purpose: Policing agencies across the USA have cited difficulty recruiting qualified applicants, thus leaving many employment vacancies unfilled. One reason for this challenge may be that those who would make exceptional police officers are barred from employment because of their body art. Varying appearance policies exist concerning tattoos, yet little is known about these policies. The purpose of this paper is to survey the tattoo policies of policing agencies. Design/methodology/approach: The tattoo policies of all 50 state-level policing agencies were reviewed to explore similarities and state-level correlates. Findings: The majority, but not all, of state police have some type of appearance policy targeting tattoos. State policing agencies that have a “no visibility” policy regarding tattoos more often were in states with a low percentage of millennial residents, high percentage of young veterans, men and non-Hispanic white citizens, and low crime; t-tests indicate “no visibility” policy states significantly differed from other states in the percentage of non-Hispanic whites and crime. Further, state policing agencies with a “no visibility” policy tended to be in northeastern states, with southern states having the fewest state policing agencies with such policies, although the χ2 test was non-significant. Originality/value: Despite the ubiquity of tattoos in the American society, the literature is scant with studies of police appearance policies regarding tattoos. This study provides a partial summary of tattoo policies at the state policing level.",
author = "McMullen, {Sara M.} and Gibbs, {Jennifer Catherine}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1108/PIJPSM-05-2018-0067",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "408--420",
journal = "Policing",
issn = "1363-951X",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Tattoos in policing : a survey of state police policies. / McMullen, Sara M.; Gibbs, Jennifer Catherine.

In: Policing, Vol. 42, No. 3, 10.06.2019, p. 408-420.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tattoos in policing

T2 - a survey of state police policies

AU - McMullen, Sara M.

AU - Gibbs, Jennifer Catherine

PY - 2019/6/10

Y1 - 2019/6/10

N2 - Purpose: Policing agencies across the USA have cited difficulty recruiting qualified applicants, thus leaving many employment vacancies unfilled. One reason for this challenge may be that those who would make exceptional police officers are barred from employment because of their body art. Varying appearance policies exist concerning tattoos, yet little is known about these policies. The purpose of this paper is to survey the tattoo policies of policing agencies. Design/methodology/approach: The tattoo policies of all 50 state-level policing agencies were reviewed to explore similarities and state-level correlates. Findings: The majority, but not all, of state police have some type of appearance policy targeting tattoos. State policing agencies that have a “no visibility” policy regarding tattoos more often were in states with a low percentage of millennial residents, high percentage of young veterans, men and non-Hispanic white citizens, and low crime; t-tests indicate “no visibility” policy states significantly differed from other states in the percentage of non-Hispanic whites and crime. Further, state policing agencies with a “no visibility” policy tended to be in northeastern states, with southern states having the fewest state policing agencies with such policies, although the χ2 test was non-significant. Originality/value: Despite the ubiquity of tattoos in the American society, the literature is scant with studies of police appearance policies regarding tattoos. This study provides a partial summary of tattoo policies at the state policing level.

AB - Purpose: Policing agencies across the USA have cited difficulty recruiting qualified applicants, thus leaving many employment vacancies unfilled. One reason for this challenge may be that those who would make exceptional police officers are barred from employment because of their body art. Varying appearance policies exist concerning tattoos, yet little is known about these policies. The purpose of this paper is to survey the tattoo policies of policing agencies. Design/methodology/approach: The tattoo policies of all 50 state-level policing agencies were reviewed to explore similarities and state-level correlates. Findings: The majority, but not all, of state police have some type of appearance policy targeting tattoos. State policing agencies that have a “no visibility” policy regarding tattoos more often were in states with a low percentage of millennial residents, high percentage of young veterans, men and non-Hispanic white citizens, and low crime; t-tests indicate “no visibility” policy states significantly differed from other states in the percentage of non-Hispanic whites and crime. Further, state policing agencies with a “no visibility” policy tended to be in northeastern states, with southern states having the fewest state policing agencies with such policies, although the χ2 test was non-significant. Originality/value: Despite the ubiquity of tattoos in the American society, the literature is scant with studies of police appearance policies regarding tattoos. This study provides a partial summary of tattoo policies at the state policing level.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053774567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053774567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/PIJPSM-05-2018-0067

DO - 10.1108/PIJPSM-05-2018-0067

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 408

EP - 420

JO - Policing

JF - Policing

SN - 1363-951X

IS - 3

ER -