Team factors that predict to sustainability indicators for community-based prevention teams

Daniel F. Perkins, Mark E. Feinberg, Mark T. Greenberg, Lesley E. Johnson, Sarah Meyer Chilenski, Claudia C. Mincemoyer, Richard L. Spoth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Because they often set out with a guarantee of only short-term funding, many community partnerships will face a threat to their sustainability almost as soon as the first money runs out. Research into the factors that enable some coalitions and partnerships to meet the challenge when others fail is limited. This study begins to fill this gap in our understanding by examining influences on the process of sustainability planning in the context of a collaborative partnership focused on youth development.We report on a longitudinal examination of the quality of planning and attitudes underpinning the sustainability of PROSPER community prevention teams whose members implement evidence-based programs designed to support positive youth development and reduce early substance use and other problem behaviors.The current research concentrates on a particular dimension of partnership effectiveness to establish whether perceptions about team functioning in play at 6 and 18 months predict the quality of sustainability planning at 36 and 48 months. How well teams functioned in the early stages was found to be strongly related to the quality of their later preparations for sustainability. Recruitment and integration of new team members, and the encouragement they subsequently received were also found to be key factors. The results strengthen the argument for providing technical assistance to meet the needs of those who promote prevention partnerships, and they provide longitudinal empirical data to support the hypotheses of other researchers who have similarly found a correlation between effective sustainability and early planning and support.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-291
Number of pages9
JournalEvaluation and Program Planning
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2011

Fingerprint

sustainability
Research
community
planning
Research Personnel
technical assistance
Factors
Sustainability
Sustainability indicators
Community-based
coalition
guarantee
money
funding
threat
examination
Planning
evidence
Problem Behavior
youth

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Strategy and Management
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Perkins, Daniel F. ; Feinberg, Mark E. ; Greenberg, Mark T. ; Johnson, Lesley E. ; Chilenski, Sarah Meyer ; Mincemoyer, Claudia C. ; Spoth, Richard L. / Team factors that predict to sustainability indicators for community-based prevention teams. In: Evaluation and Program Planning. 2011 ; Vol. 34, No. 3. pp. 283-291.
@article{fdbfbe663b7241a5a8b884d272ed7e45,
title = "Team factors that predict to sustainability indicators for community-based prevention teams",
abstract = "Because they often set out with a guarantee of only short-term funding, many community partnerships will face a threat to their sustainability almost as soon as the first money runs out. Research into the factors that enable some coalitions and partnerships to meet the challenge when others fail is limited. This study begins to fill this gap in our understanding by examining influences on the process of sustainability planning in the context of a collaborative partnership focused on youth development.We report on a longitudinal examination of the quality of planning and attitudes underpinning the sustainability of PROSPER community prevention teams whose members implement evidence-based programs designed to support positive youth development and reduce early substance use and other problem behaviors.The current research concentrates on a particular dimension of partnership effectiveness to establish whether perceptions about team functioning in play at 6 and 18 months predict the quality of sustainability planning at 36 and 48 months. How well teams functioned in the early stages was found to be strongly related to the quality of their later preparations for sustainability. Recruitment and integration of new team members, and the encouragement they subsequently received were also found to be key factors. The results strengthen the argument for providing technical assistance to meet the needs of those who promote prevention partnerships, and they provide longitudinal empirical data to support the hypotheses of other researchers who have similarly found a correlation between effective sustainability and early planning and support.",
author = "Perkins, {Daniel F.} and Feinberg, {Mark E.} and Greenberg, {Mark T.} and Johnson, {Lesley E.} and Chilenski, {Sarah Meyer} and Mincemoyer, {Claudia C.} and Spoth, {Richard L.}",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.10.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "283--291",
journal = "Evaluation and Program Planning",
issn = "0149-7189",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

Team factors that predict to sustainability indicators for community-based prevention teams. / Perkins, Daniel F.; Feinberg, Mark E.; Greenberg, Mark T.; Johnson, Lesley E.; Chilenski, Sarah Meyer; Mincemoyer, Claudia C.; Spoth, Richard L.

In: Evaluation and Program Planning, Vol. 34, No. 3, 01.08.2011, p. 283-291.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Team factors that predict to sustainability indicators for community-based prevention teams

AU - Perkins, Daniel F.

AU - Feinberg, Mark E.

AU - Greenberg, Mark T.

AU - Johnson, Lesley E.

AU - Chilenski, Sarah Meyer

AU - Mincemoyer, Claudia C.

AU - Spoth, Richard L.

PY - 2011/8/1

Y1 - 2011/8/1

N2 - Because they often set out with a guarantee of only short-term funding, many community partnerships will face a threat to their sustainability almost as soon as the first money runs out. Research into the factors that enable some coalitions and partnerships to meet the challenge when others fail is limited. This study begins to fill this gap in our understanding by examining influences on the process of sustainability planning in the context of a collaborative partnership focused on youth development.We report on a longitudinal examination of the quality of planning and attitudes underpinning the sustainability of PROSPER community prevention teams whose members implement evidence-based programs designed to support positive youth development and reduce early substance use and other problem behaviors.The current research concentrates on a particular dimension of partnership effectiveness to establish whether perceptions about team functioning in play at 6 and 18 months predict the quality of sustainability planning at 36 and 48 months. How well teams functioned in the early stages was found to be strongly related to the quality of their later preparations for sustainability. Recruitment and integration of new team members, and the encouragement they subsequently received were also found to be key factors. The results strengthen the argument for providing technical assistance to meet the needs of those who promote prevention partnerships, and they provide longitudinal empirical data to support the hypotheses of other researchers who have similarly found a correlation between effective sustainability and early planning and support.

AB - Because they often set out with a guarantee of only short-term funding, many community partnerships will face a threat to their sustainability almost as soon as the first money runs out. Research into the factors that enable some coalitions and partnerships to meet the challenge when others fail is limited. This study begins to fill this gap in our understanding by examining influences on the process of sustainability planning in the context of a collaborative partnership focused on youth development.We report on a longitudinal examination of the quality of planning and attitudes underpinning the sustainability of PROSPER community prevention teams whose members implement evidence-based programs designed to support positive youth development and reduce early substance use and other problem behaviors.The current research concentrates on a particular dimension of partnership effectiveness to establish whether perceptions about team functioning in play at 6 and 18 months predict the quality of sustainability planning at 36 and 48 months. How well teams functioned in the early stages was found to be strongly related to the quality of their later preparations for sustainability. Recruitment and integration of new team members, and the encouragement they subsequently received were also found to be key factors. The results strengthen the argument for providing technical assistance to meet the needs of those who promote prevention partnerships, and they provide longitudinal empirical data to support the hypotheses of other researchers who have similarly found a correlation between effective sustainability and early planning and support.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955733514&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955733514&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.10.003

DO - 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.10.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 21168213

AN - SCOPUS:79955733514

VL - 34

SP - 283

EP - 291

JO - Evaluation and Program Planning

JF - Evaluation and Program Planning

SN - 0149-7189

IS - 3

ER -