Team Investment and Longitudinal Relationships

An Innovative Global Health Education Model

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Problem Increasing student interest in global health has resulted in medical schools offering more global health opportunities. However, concerns have been raised, particularly about one-time, short-term experiences, including lack of follow-through for students and perpetuation of unintentional messages of global health heroism, neocolonialism, and disregard for existing systems and communities of care. Medical schools must develop global health programs that address these issues. Approach The Global Health Scholars Program (GHSP) was created in 2008-2009 at Penn State College of Medicine. This four-year program is based on values of team investment and longitudinal relationships and uses the service-learning framework of preparation, service, and reflection. Teams of approximately five students, with faculty oversight, participate in two separate monthlong trips abroad to the same host community in years 1 and 4, and in campus- and Web-based activities in years 2 and 3. Outcomes As of December 2016, 191 students have been accepted into the GHSP. Since inception, applications have grown by 475% and program sites have expanded from one to seven sites on four continents. The response from students has been positive, but logistical challenges persist in sustaining team investment and maintaining longitudinal relationships between student teams and host communities. Next Steps Formal methods of assessment should be used to compare the GHSP model with more traditional approaches to global health education. Other medical schools with similar aims can adapt the GHSP model to expand their global health programming.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1700-1703
Number of pages4
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume92
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

health promotion
health
student
neocolonialism
school
heroism
programming
medicine
lack
learning
community
Values

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Cite this

@article{2a3b5dfc71c242ddaac651d38e6ae3e7,
title = "Team Investment and Longitudinal Relationships: An Innovative Global Health Education Model",
abstract = "Problem Increasing student interest in global health has resulted in medical schools offering more global health opportunities. However, concerns have been raised, particularly about one-time, short-term experiences, including lack of follow-through for students and perpetuation of unintentional messages of global health heroism, neocolonialism, and disregard for existing systems and communities of care. Medical schools must develop global health programs that address these issues. Approach The Global Health Scholars Program (GHSP) was created in 2008-2009 at Penn State College of Medicine. This four-year program is based on values of team investment and longitudinal relationships and uses the service-learning framework of preparation, service, and reflection. Teams of approximately five students, with faculty oversight, participate in two separate monthlong trips abroad to the same host community in years 1 and 4, and in campus- and Web-based activities in years 2 and 3. Outcomes As of December 2016, 191 students have been accepted into the GHSP. Since inception, applications have grown by 475{\%} and program sites have expanded from one to seven sites on four continents. The response from students has been positive, but logistical challenges persist in sustaining team investment and maintaining longitudinal relationships between student teams and host communities. Next Steps Formal methods of assessment should be used to compare the GHSP model with more traditional approaches to global health education. Other medical schools with similar aims can adapt the GHSP model to expand their global health programming.",
author = "Kimberly Myers and Fredrick, {N. Benjamin}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0000000000001768",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "1700--1703",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

Team Investment and Longitudinal Relationships : An Innovative Global Health Education Model. / Myers, Kimberly; Fredrick, N. Benjamin.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 92, No. 12, 01.12.2017, p. 1700-1703.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Team Investment and Longitudinal Relationships

T2 - An Innovative Global Health Education Model

AU - Myers, Kimberly

AU - Fredrick, N. Benjamin

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Problem Increasing student interest in global health has resulted in medical schools offering more global health opportunities. However, concerns have been raised, particularly about one-time, short-term experiences, including lack of follow-through for students and perpetuation of unintentional messages of global health heroism, neocolonialism, and disregard for existing systems and communities of care. Medical schools must develop global health programs that address these issues. Approach The Global Health Scholars Program (GHSP) was created in 2008-2009 at Penn State College of Medicine. This four-year program is based on values of team investment and longitudinal relationships and uses the service-learning framework of preparation, service, and reflection. Teams of approximately five students, with faculty oversight, participate in two separate monthlong trips abroad to the same host community in years 1 and 4, and in campus- and Web-based activities in years 2 and 3. Outcomes As of December 2016, 191 students have been accepted into the GHSP. Since inception, applications have grown by 475% and program sites have expanded from one to seven sites on four continents. The response from students has been positive, but logistical challenges persist in sustaining team investment and maintaining longitudinal relationships between student teams and host communities. Next Steps Formal methods of assessment should be used to compare the GHSP model with more traditional approaches to global health education. Other medical schools with similar aims can adapt the GHSP model to expand their global health programming.

AB - Problem Increasing student interest in global health has resulted in medical schools offering more global health opportunities. However, concerns have been raised, particularly about one-time, short-term experiences, including lack of follow-through for students and perpetuation of unintentional messages of global health heroism, neocolonialism, and disregard for existing systems and communities of care. Medical schools must develop global health programs that address these issues. Approach The Global Health Scholars Program (GHSP) was created in 2008-2009 at Penn State College of Medicine. This four-year program is based on values of team investment and longitudinal relationships and uses the service-learning framework of preparation, service, and reflection. Teams of approximately five students, with faculty oversight, participate in two separate monthlong trips abroad to the same host community in years 1 and 4, and in campus- and Web-based activities in years 2 and 3. Outcomes As of December 2016, 191 students have been accepted into the GHSP. Since inception, applications have grown by 475% and program sites have expanded from one to seven sites on four continents. The response from students has been positive, but logistical challenges persist in sustaining team investment and maintaining longitudinal relationships between student teams and host communities. Next Steps Formal methods of assessment should be used to compare the GHSP model with more traditional approaches to global health education. Other medical schools with similar aims can adapt the GHSP model to expand their global health programming.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021395266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021395266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001768

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001768

M3 - Article

VL - 92

SP - 1700

EP - 1703

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 12

ER -